trying to identify A&M engine
#1
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (5)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Starr , SC
Looking for some help to try and identify an A&M gas engine that i got in a recent transaction. The owner couldnt remember the size. It is stamped a&m and the only numbers i can find are 49zn2 and 37H8w or it could be 37HBW. There is a V1B also on the case. I need to get an ignition set up for it. I am new to gas engines so any help here would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
#8
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
The 49zn2 is on the base of the jug and makes it a 3.2. You might want to check the color of the connecting rod to determine if it's a good crank or a bad one. Many of them were corrected by Gary Allison when he bought the line and started Brison.
#9
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
Dammit Pat, I was never coming back to this forum...But
49ZN2 is a 4.2, 47ZN2 is a 3.7, 44 ZN is a 3.2...
The numbers are bore size in millimeters...[>:]
TKG, you were right...
To the best of my limited knowledge Gary never used copper plated Sachs rods...Gary's cranks still used/use pressed in drawn cup needle rollers. Genuine Sachs and all other real gassers use REAL caged rollers...
49ZN2 is a 4.2, 47ZN2 is a 3.7, 44 ZN is a 3.2...
The numbers are bore size in millimeters...[>:]
TKG, you were right...

To the best of my limited knowledge Gary never used copper plated Sachs rods...Gary's cranks still used/use pressed in drawn cup needle rollers. Genuine Sachs and all other real gassers use REAL caged rollers...
#10
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (5)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Starr , SC
I measured the exhaust mounts and they are 1 1/2 " on center and a quick glance at the overall exhaust is about 2" so with that and the 49zn2 i'm going with it must be a 4.2. Now I did read something that if the crank case was milled it had something to do with ???just cant remember what? The crank case is milled. With that said do I need to open it up and check the crank as you guys mentioned? Second the engine has only had about 3/4 of a gallon of fuel ran thru it for break in according to the original owner so what is the expectant crank failure if it has the older crank? One last question is what type of ignition module should I get for it? I will call the above mentioned company this week but was looking for recomendations. Thanks sorry to be so long winded... .
#12
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
ORIGINAL: Antique
Dammit Pat, I was never coming back to this forum...But
49ZN2 is a 4.2, 47ZN2 is a 3.7, 44 ZN is a 3.2...
The numbers are bore size in millimeters...[>:]
TKG, you were right...
To the best of my limited knowledge Gary never used copper plated Sachs rods...Gary's cranks still used/use pressed in drawn cup needle rollers. Genuine Sachs and all other real gassers use REAL caged rollers...
Dammit Pat, I was never coming back to this forum...But
49ZN2 is a 4.2, 47ZN2 is a 3.7, 44 ZN is a 3.2...
The numbers are bore size in millimeters...[>:]
TKG, you were right...

To the best of my limited knowledge Gary never used copper plated Sachs rods...Gary's cranks still used/use pressed in drawn cup needle rollers. Genuine Sachs and all other real gassers use REAL caged rollers...
I thought about it more last night and you're right. The 44 is the 3.2. Thanks for fixing that. I meant to correct it before retiring but you know who that goes...
#13

My Feedback: (107)
It may be a 3.7 , the carb block is black and most 4.2 has a green block, that has been what I have always ran into. I had bought a a&m 4.2 but when I tore it down it was a 3.7 I had bought it cause I needed a 4.2 cylinder and the cylinder was different only by bore and the carb block other wise it lookes the same.
#18
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
Sachs model 122 Super, 123 Bore 47mm stroke 40mm 70cc 4.2 cu Inch
Model 117, 119, 120 Bore 47mm stroke 35mm 3.7 cu inch
Model 120 super Bore 49mm stroke 36mm 68cc 4.1 Cu inch
Model 111, 115, bore 44mm stroke 34mm 3.2 cu inch
Model 112, 113, 114 Bore 45mm stroke 32mm 3.1 cu inch
Model 116 bore 45mm stroke 35mm 3.4 cu inch
The lightest versions of all models are usually used for airplane engines...
Model 117, 119, 120 Bore 47mm stroke 35mm 3.7 cu inch
Model 120 super Bore 49mm stroke 36mm 68cc 4.1 Cu inch
Model 111, 115, bore 44mm stroke 34mm 3.2 cu inch
Model 112, 113, 114 Bore 45mm stroke 32mm 3.1 cu inch
Model 116 bore 45mm stroke 35mm 3.4 cu inch
The lightest versions of all models are usually used for airplane engines...
#19
Member
My Feedback: (4)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: athens,
GA
Same ignition module for all those A&M engines. I went through 3 of the 3.2 engines in the early 90's. They all had bad cranks/bearings. They would go 8-10 hours before they went out, all while running the factory recommended oil mix. A friend had one and we put in my plane to test it. It went out in about 2 hours as I remember. I finally got A&M to trade me up to their new design 4.2 after the last blow-up. I only bench ran this engine, and got out of RC about '93 until about 2 years ago. Guess I'll put this engine in a plane one of these days.
Anyone know how this A&M 4.2 engine turned out? (This one has the crank as found in a glow engine)
Anyone know how this A&M 4.2 engine turned out? (This one has the crank as found in a glow engine)
#21

My Feedback: (2)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Billingsley, AL
I have been told that if you remove the carb and the connecting rod is gold colored and magnetic, it is one of the originals with the good parts. If it isn't magnetic and is white metal, it is a later model.
#24
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (5)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Starr , SC
so Sachs is the same as A&M. thanks for all the data on how to determine what size .Glad to hear it dossnt make a difference for an ignition system . So the only remaining question is how to determine if it has this bad crank or bearing isssue and what everyone did or just replaced upon failure?




