RC Exl Ignition Users
#52
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Somewhere,
DC
Posts: 9,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: RC Exl Ignition Users
I use a 2100 ma 4.8 v Nicad for testing..Last night I left it connected to an ignition...This moning the battery was dead, the ignition still works...
The current draw wihen not running is under 100 ma, hardly enough to kill an ignition...Or even make it warm....
The current draw wihen not running is under 100 ma, hardly enough to kill an ignition...Or even make it warm....
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Arcen, , NETHERLANDS
Posts: 6,571
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
RE: RC Exl Ignition Users
My luck is that I use ignitions that switch themselves off. The red blinking light warns me to operate that little switch, if bystanders don't see it first
#56
RE: RC Exl Ignition Users
I only reported what I experienced with what I had, and the other events that may have had impact. That others have not experienced the same thing only relates what they haven't experienced. I know the sensor height can be an issue, and it was in this case. Antique related similar experiences in phone conversations.
So no butting heads, only a heads up for those that might get an engine where the ignition fails to function. The problem may not be with the ignition module, but the sensor. It's another item to check during a trouble shooting process.
So no butting heads, only a heads up for those that might get an engine where the ignition fails to function. The problem may not be with the ignition module, but the sensor. It's another item to check during a trouble shooting process.
#58
RE: RC Exl Ignition Users
ORIGINAL: Tired Old Man
I can only relate what I experienced. Doubt there may be but magnetic fields do weaken with distance, and the sensitivity of RC Exl hall sensors is unknown to me. I know what did not work, and I know what it required to make it work. As for equipment used, it was all basic audio and visual. The visible, and audible, strength of the delivered spark increased with closer proximity to the magnet. The why is unknown to me.
What I saw and experienced did not lie. I don't give a rat's behind for any complicated engineering theory intended to dispute physical evidence that's bound to be presented soon.
Ed,
The air gap between the bracket and magnet was ~3/32'' with the unmodified provided parts. I tried three different brackets an all were roughly the same for air gap spacing.
Pe,
The hub magnet was on the hub of one of the original BME 115 engines.
I can only relate what I experienced. Doubt there may be but magnetic fields do weaken with distance, and the sensitivity of RC Exl hall sensors is unknown to me. I know what did not work, and I know what it required to make it work. As for equipment used, it was all basic audio and visual. The visible, and audible, strength of the delivered spark increased with closer proximity to the magnet. The why is unknown to me.
What I saw and experienced did not lie. I don't give a rat's behind for any complicated engineering theory intended to dispute physical evidence that's bound to be presented soon.
Ed,
The air gap between the bracket and magnet was ~3/32'' with the unmodified provided parts. I tried three different brackets an all were roughly the same for air gap spacing.
Pe,
The hub magnet was on the hub of one of the original BME 115 engines.
With Hall sensors, the ignition is triggered by the COLLAPSE of the magnetic field (from the magnet underneath the pick-up), not the initiation of the field. If the magnet is not close enough to the sensor to initiate the field, then by definition, there will not be any field to COLLAPSE.
Now do you get it guys?
BTW: The first successful commercial implementation of a Hall-effect sensor was created and patented by the guys at Microswitch (A division of Honeywell) in Freeport, IL. I knew most of the engineers and scientists that worked on this project, so you can take this info and put in the bank.
B
#61
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Arcen, , NETHERLANDS
Posts: 6,571
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
RE: RC Exl Ignition Users
Some engines use ferro magnets, others use rare earth magnets. Ferro magnets (black ) are cheap and weak. They loose magnetism due to heat quicker than the rare earth types. So therein lies part of the troubleshooting process. With ferro magnets, I used postcard paper to set the distance as close as possible to the sensor holder.
Use a saw blade to check if your magnet still is going strong.
Use a saw blade to check if your magnet still is going strong.
#62
RE: RC Exl Ignition Users
I have some of the bigger black colored magnets. I would not even think of using one. I have 4 brands of magnets and the smaller ones seem far stronger. In fact the bigger Ferro magnets are getting weaker as time goes on. The magnets I bought at radio shack (small) are very good. Capt,n
#65
RE: RC Exl Ignition Users
Captain
What part are you talking about, The battery drain information or how The Rcexl will work with the OS 55 gas engine.
Tower wants 280.00 for there ignition verses $60.00 to $70.00 for a Rcexl
Tower wants $55.00 for a Hall sensor verses $6.00 to $9.00 for a Rcexl
Tower wants $60.00 for a plug cap verses $10.00 to $12.00 for a Rcexl
Battery drain test on Rcexl done by CH ignition
I just have done some battery drain tests.
All tests were done at 8000 RPM.A new single cylinder, Version 2 CHXL Ignition.
7.2 Volts -725 MA
7 Volts -675 MA
6 Volts -650 MA
4.8 Volts -475 MA
3.7 Volts -375 MA
3 Volts 300 MA
2.5 Volts 250 -MA
2.Volts - 175-MA -Weak spark, Do not no if engine would run probably not.
Under 2 volts Ignition dead. Ignition still working but Hall Effect dead. We have done test runs and the engines run fine down to 3.2 Volts.
Why use any thing over 4.8 volts. Three Nickel Metal Hydride would probably be OK. 3.6 volts.
Milton
What part are you talking about, The battery drain information or how The Rcexl will work with the OS 55 gas engine.
Tower wants 280.00 for there ignition verses $60.00 to $70.00 for a Rcexl
Tower wants $55.00 for a Hall sensor verses $6.00 to $9.00 for a Rcexl
Tower wants $60.00 for a plug cap verses $10.00 to $12.00 for a Rcexl
Battery drain test on Rcexl done by CH ignition
I just have done some battery drain tests.
All tests were done at 8000 RPM.A new single cylinder, Version 2 CHXL Ignition.
7.2 Volts -725 MA
7 Volts -675 MA
6 Volts -650 MA
4.8 Volts -475 MA
3.7 Volts -375 MA
3 Volts 300 MA
2.5 Volts 250 -MA
2.Volts - 175-MA -Weak spark, Do not no if engine would run probably not.
Under 2 volts Ignition dead. Ignition still working but Hall Effect dead. We have done test runs and the engines run fine down to 3.2 Volts.
Why use any thing over 4.8 volts. Three Nickel Metal Hydride would probably be OK. 3.6 volts.
Milton
#66
RE: RC Exl Ignition Users
I kinda liked the thread about the reasons why some ignitoins kick back. The guys posting really knew what they was talking about. Thanks Capt,n
#67
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Herk de StadLimburg, BELGIUM
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: RC Exl Ignition Users
CDI ignitions for model engines pose some kind of a problem alltogether because you cannot test if they work properly.
If the engine runs great, no problem, but if it doesn't??? how are you gone check the real timing of it?
The inductive pick-up of a stroboscope won't work because of the screen so you just have to believe it's OK and I'm a very bad believer.
If the engine runs great, no problem, but if it doesn't??? how are you gone check the real timing of it?
The inductive pick-up of a stroboscope won't work because of the screen so you just have to believe it's OK and I'm a very bad believer.
#68
RE: RC Exl Ignition Users
ORIGINAL: cuwaert
CDI ignitions for model engines pose some kind of a problem alltogether because you cannot test if they work properly.
If the engine runs great, no problem, but if it doesn't??? how are you gone check the real timing of it?
The inductive pick-up of a stroboscope won't work because of the screen so you just have to believe it's OK and I'm a very bad believer.
CDI ignitions for model engines pose some kind of a problem alltogether because you cannot test if they work properly.
If the engine runs great, no problem, but if it doesn't??? how are you gone check the real timing of it?
The inductive pick-up of a stroboscope won't work because of the screen so you just have to believe it's OK and I'm a very bad believer.
#69
RE: RC Exl Ignition Users
Kind of hard on the shielding but I slice the outer shielding and roll it away from the plug wire to use a strobe. This is after degreeing the hub or spinner backplate and affixing a pointer to view the timing marks under a strobe. That's how I found how our ignition "curves" were set up. Curve my arse. Steep ramp is more acurate.
#70
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: International Falls,
MN
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: RC Exl Ignition Users
Hey All
as you can tell by this early hour of my post I am working on getting my evolution 26gt to work with a syssa ignition. I have had if for some time and misplaced the instructions. so the story goes like this. Installed the sensor in the correct holder and mounted to engine. wired switch and battery. the hub on the engine has a ferro magnet not a rare earth. I flipped the thing over a few times with the ignition on and I (by accident ) didn't have the spark plug fully in the boot. I have not gotten this thing to spark once at all yet? any pointers for the evolution 26 with the aftermarket ignition? did I cook the sensor by not having the spark plug installed into the boot correctly? I tried flipping the hall sensor over in the holder as well with no luck? Any and all suggestions would be greatly appreciated! this is my first gasser experience and so far not off to a great start! this darn thing is keeping me up! Thanks everyone!
Tom
as you can tell by this early hour of my post I am working on getting my evolution 26gt to work with a syssa ignition. I have had if for some time and misplaced the instructions. so the story goes like this. Installed the sensor in the correct holder and mounted to engine. wired switch and battery. the hub on the engine has a ferro magnet not a rare earth. I flipped the thing over a few times with the ignition on and I (by accident ) didn't have the spark plug fully in the boot. I have not gotten this thing to spark once at all yet? any pointers for the evolution 26 with the aftermarket ignition? did I cook the sensor by not having the spark plug installed into the boot correctly? I tried flipping the hall sensor over in the holder as well with no luck? Any and all suggestions would be greatly appreciated! this is my first gasser experience and so far not off to a great start! this darn thing is keeping me up! Thanks everyone!
Tom
#72
RE: RC Exl Ignition Users
ORIGINAL: Tired Old Man
Kind of hard on the shielding but I slice the outer shielding and roll it away from the plug wire to use a strobe. This is after degreeing the hub or spinner backplate and affixing a pointer to view the timing marks under a strobe. That's how I found how our ignition "curves" were set up. Curve my arse. Steep ramp is more acurate.
Kind of hard on the shielding but I slice the outer shielding and roll it away from the plug wire to use a strobe. This is after degreeing the hub or spinner backplate and affixing a pointer to view the timing marks under a strobe. That's how I found how our ignition "curves" were set up. Curve my arse. Steep ramp is more acurate.
#74
RE: RC Exl Ignition Users
ORIGINAL: Tired Old Man
I'll request you might expand on the mag versus CDI power differences?
I'll request you might expand on the mag versus CDI power differences?
A lot of people think a flywheel mag has a "fixed timing" but the more up to date FW mags do have a advance that can give more power, (equal too CD ignition) and also a good idle.
I hope that fills your request. Best Regards Capt,n