RCU Forums

RCU Forums (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/)
-   Giant Scale Aircraft - 3D & Aerobatic (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/giant-scale-aircraft-3d-aerobatic-110/)
-   -   2 Blade or 3 Blade (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/giant-scale-aircraft-3d-aerobatic-110/5192260-2-blade-3-blade.html)

t_driver 01-01-2007 01:19 PM

2 Blade or 3 Blade
 
I just got a carden 35% with a DA 100.whats the best prop to run on it??I might try some IMAC with it and then again i want to do some mild 3D with it ...im lost .Oh can you tell me why one is better than the other?

bubbagates 01-01-2007 01:26 PM

RE: 2 Blade or 3 Blade
 
Actually for both IMAC sequences and 3D it's not a bad idea to use one of each.

3-blade for the sequences and the 2-blade for faster spool up for 3d.

It's not uncommon to change out props for certain things


t_driver 01-01-2007 01:30 PM

RE: 2 Blade or 3 Blade
 
Sounds like alot of work to change them all the time...

Spun In 01-01-2007 01:33 PM

RE: 2 Blade or 3 Blade
 
Any aerodynamic advantage over the blade configuration or weight difference with spinners??

dork_blaster 01-01-2007 04:24 PM

RE: 2 Blade or 3 Blade
 
It's been my experience that a 2 blade out performs a 3 blade in terms of perceived "oomph", especially when hovering or going vertical. The program "ThrustHP" that calculates static thrust for various props at a given RPM seems to bare (bear?) this out.

A 3-blade is quieter and is usually more than adequate for any modern, light-weight ship that is overpowered (like most of the 3D beasts out there today), and will earn you points for "quietness" in IMAC (or not be penalized for being too loud). Then again, I've seen (and heard) quiet 2-blades as well, but those tend to be exception rather than the rule.

I know these props aren't exactly cheap (especially the composites), but do what 90% of the pilots out there do - try both on the same ship and use the one YOU like best.

Happy New Year!

flyinrazrback 01-01-2007 04:49 PM

RE: 2 Blade or 3 Blade
 
Hard to go wrong with a Mejzlik 27x10 or 28x10 for both imac and 3d, or a PT 27x10 which will pull hard and yet still be a bit more quiet than the mejzlik, which with good throttle control the 27x10 or 28x10 mejzlik will still get you decent sound scores. I am not a fan of 3 blades on anything smaller than 150cc engines.

t_driver 01-01-2007 04:59 PM

RE: 2 Blade or 3 Blade
 
What about the NX props thay any good?? are thay quiet?

Pitsbros 01-01-2007 05:41 PM

RE: 2 Blade or 3 Blade
 
If I use a 3 blade which blade needs to point towards the ground when hitting compression?

flyinrazrback 01-01-2007 06:06 PM

RE: 2 Blade or 3 Blade
 
The NX props work pretty well, but can get loud. Menz is my favorite wood prop.


ORIGINAL: $1800ARF

What about the NX props thay any good?? are thay quiet?

Spun In 01-01-2007 06:28 PM

RE: 2 Blade or 3 Blade
 

ORIGINAL: Pitsbros

If I use a 3 blade which blade needs to point towards the ground when hitting compression?
I was wondering that also, and how do you clock it in case of a dead stick...do you want the blades lined up with the landing gear or with one down?

GoeKeli 01-01-2007 09:53 PM

RE: 2 Blade or 3 Blade
 
I vote 2blade mejzlik 27-10 or 3blade 24-12 wide. Good luck!

Joe

Diablo-RCU 01-02-2007 01:02 PM

RE: 2 Blade or 3 Blade
 
Mejzlik 27x10 for IMAC, because it pulls well and is not too noisy if you use throttle control in level flight. A Mejzlik 25x12 3-blade is a quieter alternative, but a lot less vertical thrust. If your plane weighs 29 lbs, the 3-blade will be doggy on hot days - expect around 5800 rpm on the ground. A Menz-S 27x10 is another alternative, pulls about the same as the Mejzlik 27x10, but will be louder. Spool up on any wooden prop makes them better for 3D. Prop pull won't be critical in Basic or Sportsman classes of IMAC.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:35 PM.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.