Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Giant Scale Aircraft - General
 Redundancy in electronics >

Redundancy in electronics

Community
Search
Notices
Giant Scale Aircraft - General Discuss all other giant scale aircraft here.

Redundancy in electronics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-29-2008 | 06:59 PM
  #1  
wings's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Carrollton, KY
Default Redundancy in electronics

Hello,


To what extend is redundant electronic systems used in Giant Scale RC Aircraft?


Is it common (or necessary) to have redundant receivers? Batteries? Servos?


I would like to learn more about this if anyone is willing to share.


Thanks,

Wings
Old 09-30-2008 | 05:39 AM
  #2  
My Feedback: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Ithaca, NY
Default RE: Redundancy in electronics

Hi,

This being a hobby, there are all sorts of strong opinions.

I personally use dual switches and dual batteries with a single rx on any rc plane under $500 in value.

Planes valued from $500 - $15,000 are equipped with dual rxs and dual batteries. Others will swear that a single rx and single battery is good to go, no matter the size of the airplane or value.

While careful installation and maintenance reduces the failure rate of equipment, the use of dual systems (dual rxs with individual batteries), each controlling 50% of the airplane insulate the plane from any failure other than RF interference.

Elson
Old 09-30-2008 | 04:38 PM
  #3  
wings's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Carrollton, KY
Default RE: Redundancy in electronics

It's hard to fathom people exchanging strong opinions on RCU! lol

Thanks for your response!
Old 09-30-2008 | 10:43 PM
  #4  
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,034
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Orlando, FL
Default RE: Redundancy in electronics

personally i use duel batterys and switches and one receiver in all my giant scale planes, 120 size and smaller 1 battery, switch, and receiver. but it is to each his own.
Old 10-01-2008 | 03:06 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Ogdensburg NY
Default RE: Redundancy in electronics

ill throw in my 2 cents here... I have 2 giant scale planes a 40% Staudacher and 50% Pitts special which both planes have 2 li-ion 4800mah batts for one receiver feeding into a regulator then into a smart fly power expander with one switch. have had both set ups for at least 2 years now and countless flights on the staudacher and no problems what so ever... thats just one way of doing it. I love the way they are both set up and would not do it any different!

on my ailerons on the staudacher i do have 2 5955 servos on each wing half and 2 5745 servos on the rudder. no problems what so ever and they do great!
so i guess if you are asking about redundancy, the only major place i have that is with my battery packs and servos.
Old 10-03-2008 | 12:44 AM
  #6  
My Feedback: (29)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 810
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Sheridan, AR
Default RE: Redundancy in electronics

just got a carden yak how do you set up dual switches and batteries? will be using a futaba 8 ch rec and a 9c radio, with one is supplying power or both, witch one to turn on first or off or does it matter thanks frank
Old 10-05-2008 | 07:22 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: , IL
Default RE: Redundancy in electronics

hi iv got a 50% taylor craft set up with two complete systems. one receiver operates right ail and left elev the other receiver operates left ail right elv ,rud and throtel very simple not much to go wrong.
i did have a receiver failer on the maiden flight, i was able to land off field without damage with only one ail and half the elv ,
set up is important eng and rud nead to be on the same receiver then right and left on ail and elv. dont use a power exspander as this becomes the weak link
Old 10-05-2008 | 07:24 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: , IL
Default RE: Redundancy in electronics

hi
Old 10-05-2008 | 07:29 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: , IL
Default RE: Redundancy in electronics

this is an aproved setup for aircraft over 55 lbs, and it works
Old 10-06-2008 | 08:03 PM
  #10  
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: , MI
Default RE: Redundancy in electronics

when you have up to $4000 in an airplane as I do in my 42%weeks solution, two recievers two switches and two batterys is cheap insurance. I figure with my JR 2.4 equiptment it cost me maybe $150 for those 3 items

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.