Help with an ID
#7
Senior Member
No not Cox, Testors.
http://www.mh-aerotools.de/airfoils/cox_frameset.htm
If you check under Other Small Engines you will see the same engine listed with the pot metal crankcase.
http://www.mh-aerotools.de/airfoils/cox_frameset.htm
If you check under Other Small Engines you will see the same engine listed with the pot metal crankcase.
#8
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Lisbon Falls, ME
Must be the McCoy .049 it's case is black and does appear to be possible plastic. Engine looks brand new and yes it has the springstart built in the nose. I found it in a box of misc. parts I bought. Will consider offers on it if anyone is interested lol. Engine spins nice and smooth with great compression. Spring Start is real strong.
#11
Banned
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Everett,
WA
ORIGINAL: Broken Wings
Konrad, you should snag that one.
There's got to be at least a couple weeks worth of technical examination/evaluation in that engine....
Konrad, you should snag that one.
There's got to be at least a couple weeks worth of technical examination/evaluation in that engine....
Sorry this is an inside joke.
All the best,
Konrad
#14
Senior Member
My Feedback: (14)
The Testors/McCoy engine shown in the pictures sprung from the old Wen-Mac line of engines.
In 1969, I bought a Testor's Skyhawk RTF (ready-to-fly) single channel R/C model. It was powered by a metal crankcase version of this engine. I was a little leary of the engine when I bought it because of all of my previous Wen-Mac experiences. The latest experiences were pleasant, but all of those years of messing with the miserable versions of Wen-Mac engines tainted my perceptions and biased me against this latest engine. It turned out that there was no reason to worry, as long as you used Cox fuel. Other sport fuels, like that burned in my OS .58 and .35 S/RC engines, did not have the punch that the little .049 engine required. That little Testors engine just got better and better as we flew the dickens out of it during the Spring, all Summer and well into early Winter before giving it to a good friend.
Ed Cregger
In 1969, I bought a Testor's Skyhawk RTF (ready-to-fly) single channel R/C model. It was powered by a metal crankcase version of this engine. I was a little leary of the engine when I bought it because of all of my previous Wen-Mac experiences. The latest experiences were pleasant, but all of those years of messing with the miserable versions of Wen-Mac engines tainted my perceptions and biased me against this latest engine. It turned out that there was no reason to worry, as long as you used Cox fuel. Other sport fuels, like that burned in my OS .58 and .35 S/RC engines, did not have the punch that the little .049 engine required. That little Testors engine just got better and better as we flew the dickens out of it during the Spring, all Summer and well into early Winter before giving it to a good friend.
Ed Cregger
#17
Senior Member
I had one, I think the last model they produced, which had mounting holes on the tank which matched Cox mounting holes. I never got it started, not even a pop, and finally gave it away. I have a couple old WenMac 049's. Once I got them broken in, they start and run nicely, not very powerful. I may put one in a sport free flight some day.





<br type="_moz" />


