Community
Search
Notices
Glow Engines Discuss RC glow engines

YSFZ115S Thoughts Please

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-14-2014 | 12:49 PM
  #1  
BAS
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Altoona, IA
Default YSFZ115S Thoughts Please

Debating on purchasing the YS FZ 115 S with the newer style reg. system . I have owned around 20 different YS 4 strokes in the past 20 years from the 63 size thru the 160 including all the newer designs in between. I am trying to find out from you guys who have the newer 115 with the regulator in the rear side of the motor on if they are a better and less troublesome regulator system than the older YS motors with the tranditional regulator system up front which seemed like always required maintenance and leaking fuel when the Regulator plunger or Regulator stuck open. Just really got away from the YS motors for a period of 5 years and went with Saitos. I really love the sound of a YS and of course the power .I have always used YS 20/20 fuel either Heli version with 23 % oil 20 to 30% nitro. Any opinions would be appreciated on the 115 . I might add this motor wont be used for pattern it is actually going on a 8 lb aerobatic type plane and would probably run the APC wide blade props. I like their downline braking and wide blades for hovering ect.

Last edited by BAS; 09-14-2014 at 12:51 PM. Reason: added information
Old 09-15-2014 | 10:49 AM
  #2  
My Feedback: (66)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,191
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
From: fairfield, CA
Default

The newer engines run well. i use them for warbird racing and run the 115 WS. The WS is set up for high Nitro. if you going to use in a 3D type plane and you can wait a couple of months YS will be coming out with a 115DZ. This engine will be perfect for you as it makes more power in the lower RPM range over the regular 115's i would think you could run 18-19" low pitch props on it.
Old 09-15-2014 | 03:56 PM
  #3  
BAS
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Altoona, IA
Default

Ok I already ordered a regular sport version I will be flying it on a plane which only weighs around 8 lbs . Its actually the new Sig 4-star 64 arf. Sig got new owners awhile back and finally are putting out some good arfs planes. I fly mostly 30cc and 50cc 100 cc aerobatic planes like the edges and extras . This plane will just be a plane I can throw in the truck and go fly and have fun. I think the regular 115 will be more than enough power with a 17/4 wide blade prop. The plane is designed to fly with a 60 to 95 cc 4 stroke. Thanks for the info .
Old 09-15-2014 | 07:43 PM
  #4  
My Feedback: (66)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,191
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
From: fairfield, CA
Default

That 115 is equal to a OS 120 AX when on 20% nitro. I dont think the 17x4 will be enough prop but never know the biggest prop I have run on mine was a 14.5x14.5 on 50% A 14x12 is a good prop for break in. in flight.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.