Community
Search
Notices
Glow Engines Discuss RC glow engines

which one is better?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-20-2004 | 01:47 AM
  #1  
Charles H. Larson's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Morris, MN
Default which one is better?

I have 2 engines to chose from a OS 40 LA and a OS 40 FP. What are the difference in these engines in power and other specs?
Old 03-20-2004 | 04:00 AM
  #2  
DarZeelon's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 8,913
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Rosh-HaAyin, ISRAEL
Default RE: which one is better?

Charles,

The FP had the Schneurle + boost port induction system, while the more modern LA has a pure Schneurle port induction system.
That would mean a power advantage for the FP.
The FP also has the right sized idle air-bleed hole in the carburettor, that the LA may need drilled, for it not to be eternally rich at idle (at least some LA engines were so effected, search RCU...).

On the counter-point, the LA has the copper flash coat applied to the cylinder sleeve, before the electro-less nickel (ABL?).
This would mean the LA is less susceptible to peeling its sleeve (but not immune to it, nevertheless).

There are no NEW FPs, maybe just unused examples, so where is your choice from?
Old 03-20-2004 | 06:54 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: haverhill, MA
Default RE: which one is better?

just to let you know, OS has changed there terms a little, istead of ABN (aluminum Brass Nickel) They use ABL, which is Advanced Bimetallic Liner. It's still ther same thing as ABN, but a different name to throw you off.

sean
Old 03-20-2004 | 09:05 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,065
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Philadelphia, PA
Default RE: which one is better?

I would avoid the LA with its rear-mounted needle valve. It is hard to route the fuel line to it, the response to adjusting the needle valve is slower and the backplate screws sometimes loosen. And finally, it is goofy looking while the FP looks a real engine.
Old 03-20-2004 | 10:31 AM
  #5  
Charles H. Larson's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Morris, MN
Default RE: which one is better?

I bought a brand new LA and bought a slightly used FP from ebay. I have 2 planes. One is a Sig Kadet Senior and an Braun Airhawk 1. The kadet senior is alot larger (78" wing span, the airhawk is 58 1/2") so i think I'll use the FP on the Kadet.
Old 03-20-2004 | 10:38 AM
  #6  
FlyingPilgrim's Avatar
My Feedback: (26)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,504
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Canton, MI
Default RE: which one is better?

The FP is much nicer looking, and needle valve is less prone to being snapped off in a crash. LA's plastic backplate is very weak, and lots of needles have broken off. If remote needle is important to you for safety, use the LA. Both are nice, easy to tune engines.

Pilgrim
Old 03-20-2004 | 10:39 AM
  #7  
JoeAirPort's Avatar
My Feedback: (41)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,259
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Milwaukee, WI
Default RE: which one is better?

As I always say, my OS 40FP is my best running and most reliable engine that I have (out of 5). Many people at my field have commented how nice it runs. Can't comment on the LA but many peope like it, some don't.

Joe

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.