ultra thrust mufflers
#2
Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Percy,
IL
Yes, ultra thrust mufflers perform as advertised. I have one on os 46, forgot the actual tach reading but it will make a very noticeable difference. You'll need to set fuel mixture richer,more fuel for more rpm. Just a reminder so you don't fry your engine if you go with the UT muffler.
#3

My Feedback: (8)
I agree with Vertigo's post. You will see a substantial increase in RPMs. As with any tuned system, you will have to make sure you are using the correct propeller. Since the UltraThrust is a fixed length tuned muffler, you will not be able to tune it to your favorite prop. You will most likely have to experiment a little to determine which prop diameter and pitch combination gives the best performance. I do not know whether Performance Specialties provides prop recommendations. A good tachometer is essential in order to truly know which prop is best. An accurate radar gun is even better.
#4
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,025
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Tulsa, OK
Originally posted by dwsc
do the ultra thrst mufflers provide any rpm gain as they claim
do the ultra thrst mufflers provide any rpm gain as they claim
#6

My Feedback: (8)
dwsc,
I see the figures you posted for that engine/prop/fuel setup but what I can't tell is whether you think that RPM level is good or bad. In my experience, that RPM level is very mediochre and not really near what the .46FX is truly capable of.
Mike Connor,
What were the rpm readings you got both before and after you bolted on the Ultrathrust?
I said earlier that 14,000 rpms was pretty mediochre. I base that on long years of experience racing SIG 4-Star .40s where everyone had to use the same engine fuel and prop. The engine was a stock SuperTigre GS .40. The fuel we had to use was 15% mostly Cool Power but that might be different from race to race. The prop was a Master Airscrew 10X6(the old, wider blade configuration). Since we were pretty heavy into racing, we were taching these engines all the time. The competitive engines turned that prop from 14,800 to 15,000 RPMs. I retired many an engine that would no longer turn at least 14,800. The average engines were in the 14,500 to 14,700 range. Only once did I see an engine that would not turn well over 14,000 and that was a reallly worn out basketcase. The mufflers used were entirely stock but they were the ones which could be rotated around a short header, not the smaller ones that came out later. When Master Airscrew changed their prop configuration to a narrower blade, these engines consistently gained another 700 RPMs over what they turned the old prop with.
I guess the bottom line is that I would find it very hard to be happy with any .40 or .46 engine that would only turn a 10X6 prop at 14,000. I know that, if the engine is in good condition, the O.S. .46FX has to be capable of so much more performance than that.
I see the figures you posted for that engine/prop/fuel setup but what I can't tell is whether you think that RPM level is good or bad. In my experience, that RPM level is very mediochre and not really near what the .46FX is truly capable of.
Mike Connor,
What were the rpm readings you got both before and after you bolted on the Ultrathrust?
I said earlier that 14,000 rpms was pretty mediochre. I base that on long years of experience racing SIG 4-Star .40s where everyone had to use the same engine fuel and prop. The engine was a stock SuperTigre GS .40. The fuel we had to use was 15% mostly Cool Power but that might be different from race to race. The prop was a Master Airscrew 10X6(the old, wider blade configuration). Since we were pretty heavy into racing, we were taching these engines all the time. The competitive engines turned that prop from 14,800 to 15,000 RPMs. I retired many an engine that would no longer turn at least 14,800. The average engines were in the 14,500 to 14,700 range. Only once did I see an engine that would not turn well over 14,000 and that was a reallly worn out basketcase. The mufflers used were entirely stock but they were the ones which could be rotated around a short header, not the smaller ones that came out later. When Master Airscrew changed their prop configuration to a narrower blade, these engines consistently gained another 700 RPMs over what they turned the old prop with.
I guess the bottom line is that I would find it very hard to be happy with any .40 or .46 engine that would only turn a 10X6 prop at 14,000. I know that, if the engine is in good condition, the O.S. .46FX has to be capable of so much more performance than that.
#7
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,025
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Tulsa, OK
Originally posted by aptar
dwsc,
Mike Connor,
What were the rpm readings you got both before and after you bolted on the Ultrathrust?
dwsc,
Mike Connor,
What were the rpm readings you got both before and after you bolted on the Ultrathrust?
#9
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,025
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Tulsa, OK
Originally posted by dwsc
I think that the rpms are good but i think the can be better, what are you drilling out?
I think that the rpms are good but i think the can be better, what are you drilling out?
#10

My Feedback: (55)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Littleton, CO
I had heard that the Tower mufflers for their 46 will increase RPM about the same as an Ultra Thrust. The best part is they are $13.00 I bought a couple and was able to get 16,000 RPM with an APC 10x6 on an OS 46FX. Not bad for the price. Any one else have any experience with these mufflers.
#11
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,025
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Tulsa, OK
Originally posted by IXLR8
I had heard that the Tower mufflers for their 46 will increase RPM about the same as an Ultra Thrust. The best part is they are $13.00 I bought a couple and was able to get 16,000 RPM with an APC 10x6 on an OS 46FX. Not bad for the price. Any one else have any experience with these mufflers.
I had heard that the Tower mufflers for their 46 will increase RPM about the same as an Ultra Thrust. The best part is they are $13.00 I bought a couple and was able to get 16,000 RPM with an APC 10x6 on an OS 46FX. Not bad for the price. Any one else have any experience with these mufflers.
#13
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Montgomery,
AL
I own a tower hobbies muffler and the ultra thrust.
The tower does give a boost, but not as significant as the Ultra thrust...ya get what you pay for...
I had similar results to Mike Conner
I doubt the Ultrathrust is made in a size that would fit the LA series engines...I don't believe they're designed to withstand the huge RPM boost.
The tower does give a boost, but not as significant as the Ultra thrust...ya get what you pay for...
I had similar results to Mike Conner
I doubt the Ultrathrust is made in a size that would fit the LA series engines...I don't believe they're designed to withstand the huge RPM boost.
#14
Senior Member
Just a warning: your engine has to have been broken in appropriately or might not see the improvement. I have one that wasn't (I've concluded... but not 100% certain).
I concluded that if your 46fx will turn a 10x6 at 14k+ on 10 or 15% fuel using the stock baffled muffler, then you are probably okay and will see it running at 15K+ on the Ultra or Jett. (I have a Jett Stream). I have never been completely certain if the 14K+ reports were baffle in or out... but I see Mike Connor reports baffle in.. so there you go.
Mine will not turn more than about 13500 with the baffled stock muffler and a 10x6. With the Jett it won't hit more than 14400 - fully leaned out, not backed off. The engine just seems to struggle to run past 14K. The Jett Stream is tuned for 15K. You need to run up around that speed to see the full benefit. If you get it up near 15K static rpm, then you should see a nice boost from the tuned exhaust when it unloads in the air and pushes into the 15K tuning range.
I concluded that if your 46fx will turn a 10x6 at 14k+ on 10 or 15% fuel using the stock baffled muffler, then you are probably okay and will see it running at 15K+ on the Ultra or Jett. (I have a Jett Stream). I have never been completely certain if the 14K+ reports were baffle in or out... but I see Mike Connor reports baffle in.. so there you go.
Mine will not turn more than about 13500 with the baffled stock muffler and a 10x6. With the Jett it won't hit more than 14400 - fully leaned out, not backed off. The engine just seems to struggle to run past 14K. The Jett Stream is tuned for 15K. You need to run up around that speed to see the full benefit. If you get it up near 15K static rpm, then you should see a nice boost from the tuned exhaust when it unloads in the air and pushes into the 15K tuning range.
#15
Hi all, I've got a question for ya...How about those Macs one piece mufflers? You know, the black ones that look like a big header that "necks down" near the outlet? I've got one but haven't used it yet(it's like 10below wind chill right now) Anybody know how they compare to the above mentioned U T + Tower muffs?
#16
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Castaic, CA
Macs. They don't compare. They're no better/worse than a stock muffler (IMEX).
I've never gotten less than a 1000rpm boost out of an ultra thrust and never less than 6 db increase in noise.
I've never gotten less than a 1000rpm boost out of an ultra thrust and never less than 6 db increase in noise.
#18

My Feedback: (5)
The Mac's one peice mufflers work well over the stock units. I have one on a YS .45 and works well for the price. We have them on OS .46s, OS .61s, os la.46s, ST.60s & 90s. All have provided a 400-500 rpm increase. No they are not pipes or Ultrathrusts, but they were not designed to be. Is the Ultrathrust a good unit for the "Price"? Sure, but so is the Mac's ($25-$35). In most cases the Mac's is lighter than stock and provides a nice boost.
#19

My Feedback: (85)
I would agree the Mac is lighter and will not fall apart in flight. On the same 46's with the same prop I had no increase in rpm's on either engine. If you want to really get a performance boost at a great price use a Mousse can muffler. Do a search on how to make one. There is a source for complete Mousse cans down in Fla. I cant find to paper. I have one on my webra32 and it screams. At $28 it was a deal. Pete



