Community
Search
Notices
Glow Engines Discuss RC glow engines

Moki 1.35 on a TF Mustang?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-12-2005, 08:54 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
zope_pope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Aurora, CO
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Moki 1.35 on a TF Mustang?

Hey guys,
I am building the Topflite 1/7 Mustang and was wondering what you thought of this plane with the moki 1.35. I hear it comes out tail heavy, so i would rather add engine than lead. I also live at 6000' so figure roughly about 15% less power than you lucky folks at sea level. I was looking for ys 1.10 but they are just all gone. Crazy. Thanks
Adam
Old 10-12-2005, 10:17 PM
  #2  
My Feedback: (76)
 
DiscoWings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 2,715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Moki 1.35 on a TF Mustang?

Sure! When you fly it, everyone will be like: http://ualuealuealeuale.ytmnd.com/
Old 10-13-2005, 12:05 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
zope_pope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Aurora, CO
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Moki 1.35 on a TF Mustang?

Dude, what the hell is that? hahaha. But seriously, what do you think?
Old 10-13-2005, 02:25 AM
  #4  
My Feedback: (76)
 
DiscoWings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 2,715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Moki 1.35 on a TF Mustang?

, that is when people are like starting going OMG OMG.

its too much power I think. 2 stroke 91 or a 4 stroke 91 would be good. Even YS 110. Moki 135 is going to add weight and icnrease wing loading, speed will be faster but you will have to build a stronger firewall when you put the plane together.
Old 10-13-2005, 11:48 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
zope_pope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Aurora, CO
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Moki 1.35 on a TF Mustang?

Thanks for the reply. I just thought the moki would be a good alternative to the ys 1.10. It would be kind of insane, but we shall see. I havent built the firewall yet, so I may just reinforce it. The plane does come out tail heavy (or so i hear) so extra weight up front wont change the wingloading (i would be adding weight anyhow just to balance). I am undecided at the moment. This is also my first warbird, so i dont want anything psycho to fly. Anyone else has any opinions?

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.