Velocity Stack for a Surpass 70
#1
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (2)
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Weatherford,
TX
Anybody know of a velocity stack for a Surpass 70? I notice the photos of the FL-70 seems to have one. I am looking for one for 70s. I know all the Saito's can be fitted with one.
Cheers,
Chip
Cheers,
Chip
#3
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 20,205
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes
on
15 Posts
From: Mary Esther, Florida, FL
Chip:
Pictures are my first added stack, used to prove the throry. It's on a Magnum 25, it also has the conic shaped protrusion on the intake casting. I just swaged it, you can see the depression around the bottom end, it has not moved since I put it on.
Bill.
Pictures are my first added stack, used to prove the throry. It's on a Magnum 25, it also has the conic shaped protrusion on the intake casting. I just swaged it, you can see the depression around the bottom end, it has not moved since I put it on.
Bill.
#5
A velocity stack is like a tuned exhaust in a way except it relies more on having a long column of moving air that likes to keep on moving towards the inlet valve even after it's closed. This builds up some pressure to help force air past the valve next time it opens. In other words, it uses the inertia of a column of air to ram into the cylinder. Like the old Dodge Ramcharger engines or the Mercedes 300SL used. BTW, that's why the 300SL engine lays over at a 45 degree angle. It's to give room for the inlet manifold length. These engines were tuned for around the 6000 rev mark and used a manifold somewhere around 30" long but our engines run twice as fast so only need a velocity stack half as long which would be...errr...let's see....30 divided by 2 gives...ummm...I'm not sure but I think it's longer than in the photo 
Sorry guys, I can't help myself sometimes
But what a stack like those in the photo will do is stop most of the fuel that sometimes spits out the carb. CL team race engines like the Oliver Tiger use a very long stack because they can't afford to waste any fuel.

Sorry guys, I can't help myself sometimes

But what a stack like those in the photo will do is stop most of the fuel that sometimes spits out the carb. CL team race engines like the Oliver Tiger use a very long stack because they can't afford to waste any fuel.
#6
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (2)
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Weatherford,
TX
Thanks. I did not want to make one but I guess that is the only solution. Among its advantages is that it tends to keep the firewall clean, that contains the carb spit back.
Cheers,
Chip
Cheers,
Chip
#7

My Feedback: (16)
This has been discussed by William Robison before but you can put a "Bru Line air cleaner" on the carb and serve the purpose of keeping the fuel contained.
http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LX9160&P=7
http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...p?&I=LX9158&P=
http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LX9160&P=7
http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...p?&I=LX9158&P=
#8
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 20,205
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes
on
15 Posts
From: Mary Esther, Florida, FL
Chip:
Here are two pictures of the Bru-Line air filter installed. Both engines have sealed front bearings, both stay sterile except for the exhaust, and in the case of the Saito, out the case vent.
Bill.
Here are two pictures of the Bru-Line air filter installed. Both engines have sealed front bearings, both stay sterile except for the exhaust, and in the case of the Saito, out the case vent.
Bill.
#9
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 20,205
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes
on
15 Posts
From: Mary Esther, Florida, FL
Brian:
Because of the length needed for intake tuning you will not see me call this extension a "Velocity" stack, I refer to it as an "Intake" stack.
Interesting that the team race boys use the trick, I had never heard of it when I started thinking about having a cleaner and more economical engine.
Bill.
Because of the length needed for intake tuning you will not see me call this extension a "Velocity" stack, I refer to it as an "Intake" stack.
Interesting that the team race boys use the trick, I had never heard of it when I started thinking about having a cleaner and more economical engine.
Bill.
#10
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: McLoud, OK
I have an OS 70 Surpass and am also looking to putting a Velocity Stack on it.
W8YE described the extension below the carburetor it measures .470 in diameter and is .175 tall.
Does any one have the inside diameter of the Saito velocity stack, or the carburetor extension OD of the Saito.
If the Saito is the same or just a little bigger like .475 the Saito will go on the OS 70 Surpass.
The picture of the Bru Line filter is attached to a Saito, so I'm wondering how much of a difference in diameter is there?
I looked at the Bru-Line site and I think the small end of the rubber filter housing was 3/8, thats .100 smaller than the OS extension.
The rubber may stretch that much, but I don't know.
If anyone can measure there Saito 72, or 82 carb extension and post it, that would be much appreciated.
W8YE described the extension below the carburetor it measures .470 in diameter and is .175 tall.
Does any one have the inside diameter of the Saito velocity stack, or the carburetor extension OD of the Saito.
If the Saito is the same or just a little bigger like .475 the Saito will go on the OS 70 Surpass.
The picture of the Bru Line filter is attached to a Saito, so I'm wondering how much of a difference in diameter is there?
I looked at the Bru-Line site and I think the small end of the rubber filter housing was 3/8, thats .100 smaller than the OS extension.
The rubber may stretch that much, but I don't know.
If anyone can measure there Saito 72, or 82 carb extension and post it, that would be much appreciated.
#14
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: McLoud, OK
W8YE Thank you for responding.
Just as I suspected the Saito Venturi small diameter is too small for the OS.
7.75mm = .305 inches and the OS extension that it would attach to is .470 inches or 11.938mm almost the size of the big end
of the venturi.
Looks like I will have to fabricate the stack and solder a screen to the inlet for the filter.
Just as I suspected the Saito Venturi small diameter is too small for the OS.
7.75mm = .305 inches and the OS extension that it would attach to is .470 inches or 11.938mm almost the size of the big end
of the venturi.
Looks like I will have to fabricate the stack and solder a screen to the inlet for the filter.
#16
Yeah, but when you're only allowed 7cc of fuel including the fuel line (that's less than a 1/4 ounce) in FAI team race, you can't afford to waste even a drop
.
.



