How to retrofit a Ducted Fan Engine for Propeller Use
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bruce,
MS
Posts: 1,516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How to retrofit a Ducted Fan Engine for Propeller Use
Ok I know it has been done but I have never seen one. What is the techinique for useing a ducted fan for use with propellers. What engines can be use, what pipes, what props, what airframes, etc. I already know the ducted fans engines pull in the 20,000+ range and require small propellers. Someone who uses this setup could share with the rest of us. I hear that they will pull a sleek plane very fast
#2
Banned
RE: How to retrofit a Ducted Fan Engine for Propeller Use
They are ported completely wrong to turn a useful sized prop. Plus the crankshaft is probaby too short. Why would you do it anyway when you can get an engine made to do it in the first place?
#4
Senior Member
RE: How to retrofit a Ducted Fan Engine for Propeller Use
Buzz,
Engines originally intended to power a 5" diameter ducted, are timed to be at their best between 21,000-25,000 RPM.
As such, propping such an engine to spin more slowly, to observe the prop manufacturers' RPM limits (and to prevent the risk of a 'grenaded' prop...), would be using a thinner part of this engine's power curve. Wasted performance potential.
On the other hand, propping them to spin at their original RPM, would require an F-1 type pylon racing prop.
These are available only for .40 engines and are the only GFN props that would endure this RPM.
Normal .40 size C/F props, like from Bolly, would serve the same purpose and would properly load a .91 sized D/F engine, for its intended RPM, without breaking up for sure (not guaranteed not to break up at 23-25K, but the risk of it happeneng is lower).
Engines originally intended to power a 5" diameter ducted, are timed to be at their best between 21,000-25,000 RPM.
As such, propping such an engine to spin more slowly, to observe the prop manufacturers' RPM limits (and to prevent the risk of a 'grenaded' prop...), would be using a thinner part of this engine's power curve. Wasted performance potential.
On the other hand, propping them to spin at their original RPM, would require an F-1 type pylon racing prop.
These are available only for .40 engines and are the only GFN props that would endure this RPM.
Normal .40 size C/F props, like from Bolly, would serve the same purpose and would properly load a .91 sized D/F engine, for its intended RPM, without breaking up for sure (not guaranteed not to break up at 23-25K, but the risk of it happeneng is lower).