YS 63s
#1
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: .Vic, AUSTRALIA
I have ordered one of these, how will this motor comapre to my Saito 82a which is currently turning a 13x7 apc approx 10,300 rpm on 15% nitro / 18% synthetic.
I found this prop to be the best combo for my Seagull Phoenix PC-9 in thrust and speed.
I was hoping to get a bit more power out of the YS, but if its close that would be good enough.
What rpm can I expect with the 13x7 using 20/20 on the YS?
RcShacknet
I found this prop to be the best combo for my Seagull Phoenix PC-9 in thrust and speed.
I was hoping to get a bit more power out of the YS, but if its close that would be good enough.
What rpm can I expect with the 13x7 using 20/20 on the YS?
RcShacknet
#3
Senior Member
RC, I would estimate rpm somewhere around 9800 - 10,000 rpm with that prop.
I would put my money on the YS .63 being a little more powerful than the Saito .82 but to get that power advantage, I'd recommend letting the YS rev to between 11,000 and 11,500, static. They seem to prefer being in that higher range. With that in mind, try a 13x6, 13x5 or maybe a 12x8 and 12x7 as well.
Do let us know what figures you get. You'll love the engine - they are a real jewel.
I would put my money on the YS .63 being a little more powerful than the Saito .82 but to get that power advantage, I'd recommend letting the YS rev to between 11,000 and 11,500, static. They seem to prefer being in that higher range. With that in mind, try a 13x6, 13x5 or maybe a 12x8 and 12x7 as well.
Do let us know what figures you get. You'll love the engine - they are a real jewel.
#4
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: .Vic, AUSTRALIA
Currently with the Saito 82 and the 13x7 it has good speed and not bad vertical, with the 13x6 the vertical is much better but it seems to fly slightly slower. I have tried the 12x8 and it has even less vertical.
If i go down to a 12x prop with the YS, how will this give me better vertical than using a 13x prop?
RcShacknet
If i go down to a 12x prop with the YS, how will this give me better vertical than using a 13x prop?
RcShacknet
#5
Senior Member
Well, if vertical is your highest priority, stick to the 13" prop and bring down the pitch until your new YS .63S is doing about 11,000 to 11,500 rpm. At this rpm level, the YS .63 should be putting out close to its best horsepower. The YS will rev much more freely than the Saito and should unload better in flight.
Experiment with props - you never know what works best until you try stuff.
Experiment with props - you never know what works best until you try stuff.
#6
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: .Vic, AUSTRALIA
I guess if i use the 13x6 with the YS and it it revs much faster than the saito it should give me better speed.
What rpm range can I expect with a 13x6?
In the manual it says to fly the plane during the breakin period with a slighly rich setting, What do you guys do? Do you need to take it easy or can you just go for it?
RcShacknet
What rpm range can I expect with a 13x6?
In the manual it says to fly the plane during the breakin period with a slighly rich setting, What do you guys do? Do you need to take it easy or can you just go for it?
RcShacknet
#10
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,047
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Leesburg,
IN
I have two 63s that are on my 104" PBN Nomad. For break-in I ran both well to the rich side for a bit over an hour each on a Balsa USA Stingray, both on wheels and on floats. Remembering that the engines were far from being fully broken in, were running rich and therefore the RPMs were low, on both engines the RPMs with APC 13x6 prop was 11,000. For the Nomad, due to clearance issues I will be using three-bladed props. After experimentation with the Stingray it appears that I will be using three-bladed 12x6 Master Airscrew props. These gave 12,500 RPM versus 9,900 for similar 12x8 props - again these were during break-in so there wasn't any intent to max. out the power.
Hope that this is helpful
Hope that this is helpful




