3-blade propellers
#1

Thread Starter
My Feedback: (38)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

Just looking for some general input on 3 blade prop selection. I have zero experience with them but would like to run one on a GP P-6E Hawk I am putting together. I will be running a Saito 1.50 FS and am thinking I will use a 17x6 2 blade for the first flights. Suggestions on manufactures would be helpful also. Graupner and Master Airscrew don't appear to go larger than 16 in. diameter.
Thanks in advance.
Thanks in advance.
#2

My Feedback: (10)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Displaced Canadian in Central Texas TX
Posts: 2,601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

The rule as far as what size of 3 Bladed Prop to use is to decrease the Diameter by 1 inch and increase the Pitch 1; so for the 17 X 6 2 Bladed Prop you would need a 16 X 8 3 Bladed Prop as an equivalent to the 2 Bladed Prop you listed.
#4

My Feedback: (102)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Colonial Beach, VA
Posts: 20,370
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes
on
22 Posts

I have run a 16x8 three blade, both Graupner and MasterAirscrew on my Satio 1.50 and they are a bit much only allowing about 8,400 rpm. The Master Airscrew 15x7 3B is perfect for the 1.50 as is the Graupner 14x7 3B due to its wider blades. People tend to forget that adding the 3rd blade is a 50% increase in load, the one inch rule simply does not allow for this.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Arcen, , NETHERLANDS
Posts: 6,571
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts

you are right , though the load increase is slightly less than 50%, more like 35-40% because the blades now work in a higher slipstream speed due to the higher prop disk load.
It is the prop disk load that accelerates the air mass passing through it. (according to one theory, and the Newtonian action=reaction law)
It is the prop disk load that accelerates the air mass passing through it. (according to one theory, and the Newtonian action=reaction law)