Slimline 4-Stroke Muffler?
#1
Thread Starter
Guest
My Feedback: (12)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Has anybody used the Slimline 4-Stroke Muffler for an OS FS-91 II Surpass?
This one:

I am thinking of using one to mount the engine horizontal in a Y/A Extra.
Do these increase the noise significantly? Do they cause problems with not enough back pressure to supply fuel to the engine?
Any other tips?
This one:

I am thinking of using one to mount the engine horizontal in a Y/A Extra.
Do these increase the noise significantly? Do they cause problems with not enough back pressure to supply fuel to the engine?
Any other tips?
#4
Haven't used one for a .91, but I have used basically the same product for the O.S. 1.20. Worked fine, and met our field's 98Db at 3-meter rule..... came out at like 96-97Db with an APC 16x8 prop.
BJH
BJH
#5
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: San Francisco, CA
Mav- Take a look at the Bisson version as well to make a fair comparison.
Why not use the stock muffler? Certainly you can reposition it
to effectively be out of the way?
Why not use the stock muffler? Certainly you can reposition it
to effectively be out of the way?
#6

My Feedback: (20)
I just received mine yesterday with my new OS .91 4 stroke for my GP Lancaire.
I assembled the engine and muffler last night to see what it looks like. I like it so much that I will be buying another and replacing the stock muffler on my World Models Midget Mustang.
Sorry, it's brand new. I can't give you a flight report.
Don
I assembled the engine and muffler last night to see what it looks like. I like it so much that I will be buying another and replacing the stock muffler on my World Models Midget Mustang.
Sorry, it's brand new. I can't give you a flight report.
Don
#7
Thread Starter
Guest
My Feedback: (12)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by ShempHoward
Mav- Take a look at the Bisson version as well to make a fair comparison.
Mav- Take a look at the Bisson version as well to make a fair comparison.
I didn't know Bisson made a muffler for a 4-Stroke. I thought their mufflers were all Pitts style for 2-strokes.
Why not use the stock muffler? Certainly you can reposition it to effectively be out of the way?
If I go with this Slimline muffler, it exhausts straight down behind the engine and should not require much cowl cutting and also make it easier to replace and remove the cowl after it is mounted.
I always hated having to remove the muffler from my OS FS-70 II in my WM P-51 whenever I wanted to remove the cowl.
#8
Thread Starter
Guest
My Feedback: (12)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by hattend
I just received mine yesterday with my new OS .91 4 stroke for my GP Lancaire.
I just received mine yesterday with my new OS .91 4 stroke for my GP Lancaire.
#9

My Feedback: (20)
Originally posted by maverick
Let us know how it goes when you get to run the engine. I am mainly concerned about having enough back pressure to push the fuel into the engine, as I have heard some Pitts mufflers have problems with this.
Let us know how it goes when you get to run the engine. I am mainly concerned about having enough back pressure to push the fuel into the engine, as I have heard some Pitts mufflers have problems with this.
Are you talking about 4 strokes?
Don
#10
Thread Starter
Guest
My Feedback: (12)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by hattend
Are you talking about 4 strokes?
Are you talking about 4 strokes?
I just wanted to make sure there weren't other engines with the same problem.
#11
Senior Member
My Feedback: (15)
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Reston, VA
I have this muffler on a Saito 180 mounted in a H9 quarter scale Cap (The blue and white one). It had the stock muffler in it originally. I love it. It's seems slightly quieter than the stock muffler. Also, I have not had any fuel flow problems, seems to provide plenty of back pressure. I have the smoke version, but have not yet run smoke through it.
I did have to cut a notch out of the cowl to accomodate the can part of the muffler. The Cap cowl easily accomodated the Saito on its side, but the cowl narrows below the cylinder head location and that's where this muffler sticks out.
Jason
I did have to cut a notch out of the cowl to accomodate the can part of the muffler. The Cap cowl easily accomodated the Saito on its side, but the cowl narrows below the cylinder head location and that's where this muffler sticks out.
Jason
#12
Thread Starter
Guest
My Feedback: (12)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Fishstyx
I have this muffler on a Saito 180 mounted in a H9 quarter scale Cap (The blue and white one). It had the stock muffler in it originally. I love it. It's seems slightly quieter than the stock muffler. Also, I have not had any fuel flow problems, seems to provide plenty of back pressure. I have the smoke version, but have not yet run smoke through it.
I have this muffler on a Saito 180 mounted in a H9 quarter scale Cap (The blue and white one). It had the stock muffler in it originally. I love it. It's seems slightly quieter than the stock muffler. Also, I have not had any fuel flow problems, seems to provide plenty of back pressure. I have the smoke version, but have not yet run smoke through it.




