os25fx or TT pro36?
05-29-2003, 02:45 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (17)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cressona, PA
Posts: 2,320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
os25fx or TT pro36?
I am wondering where I ger the best power to weight performance. I dont trust the numbers posted in their web sites.
Also I am surprised to see that they are the same price. Any explination?
Also I am surprised to see that they are the same price. Any explination?
05-29-2003, 03:35 PM
#2
Senior Member
My Feedback: (18)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Pocatello, ID
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
os25fx or TT pro36?
Crash90........
My buddy has a TT .36 on a Wonder and it absolutely screams!!! Not sure of exact RPM's, but I know it was alot more powerful than the Mag .28 I was using. Made me wish I'd spent the extra $15 bucks.
Beau
My buddy has a TT .36 on a Wonder and it absolutely screams!!! Not sure of exact RPM's, but I know it was alot more powerful than the Mag .28 I was using. Made me wish I'd spent the extra $15 bucks.
Beau
05-29-2003, 04:48 PM
#3
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Canada,
BC, CANADA
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Power:Weight
CRASH,
I was wondering the same thing a while back and went with the TT Pro36. Weight of 8.8 oz for the OS 25FX does not include muffler. The TT has about 1.1 oz of fat if I recall, 11.4 oz/323 grams with muffler.
This works out to be about 10% more weight and 44% more displacement over the OS25. The Pro 36 swings an APC 10x6 at 12500 and apparently has more jam then the 32SX.
I'm really happy with the performance and quality of mine. Excellent power plant!
Happy Fly'n....
I was wondering the same thing a while back and went with the TT Pro36. Weight of 8.8 oz for the OS 25FX does not include muffler. The TT has about 1.1 oz of fat if I recall, 11.4 oz/323 grams with muffler.
This works out to be about 10% more weight and 44% more displacement over the OS25. The Pro 36 swings an APC 10x6 at 12500 and apparently has more jam then the 32SX.
I'm really happy with the performance and quality of mine. Excellent power plant!
Happy Fly'n....
05-29-2003, 09:29 PM
#6
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Canada,
BC, CANADA
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Irvine 39
Ernie,
I've heard nothing but good about the Irvine 39, but isn't it getting up there in weight?
I think the idea here is most, "Bang for the Buck" weight wise in a 25 size?
Happy Fly'n...
I've heard nothing but good about the Irvine 39, but isn't it getting up there in weight?
I think the idea here is most, "Bang for the Buck" weight wise in a 25 size?
Happy Fly'n...
05-29-2003, 09:48 PM
#7
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Canada,
BC, CANADA
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
os25fx or TT pro36?
I done a little poke'n around at the web site's.
Irvine 25 - 12.1 oz/ w muffler. Irvine 39 - 13.6 oz/ w muffler
OS 25 FX - 8.8 oz/ wo muffler OS 32 SX - 9.5 oz/ wo muffler
Gotta figure the muffler is at least 2 oz. All are good power plants, but for wieght per cu.in the TT Pro 36 looks like the best bet?
Happy Fly'n....
Irvine 25 - 12.1 oz/ w muffler. Irvine 39 - 13.6 oz/ w muffler
OS 25 FX - 8.8 oz/ wo muffler OS 32 SX - 9.5 oz/ wo muffler
Gotta figure the muffler is at least 2 oz. All are good power plants, but for wieght per cu.in the TT Pro 36 looks like the best bet?
Happy Fly'n....
