Which engine....
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Lufkin,
TX
I wanting to purchase my first 4 cycle engine for my Big Stik which is for 60 size, 2 cycle engines. I'm new to RC started last year been flying without an instructor for about two months. I'm looking for an easy to run, easy to maintain engine. I would like to know you opinion on the O.S FX-70 II Surpass and the O.S. FS-91 II Surpass. Weight difference is 2.35 oz. Give me both pros and cons. If you have any views on the Saito 72 pass them along.
#2
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: London, UNITED KINGDOM
You can't go wrong with either the OSs. The Saito is a loverly engine, but does take a bit more work to run in, so may not be perfect as a first 4 stroke if you don't have anyone else around to assist (though plenty of threads on RCU covering them).
As for size, as it is a 60 size plane, you would probably be disappointed going for either the 70s in the long run. I would suggest sticking to the 90 size engines so you have enough power to help you progress.
Don't forget the TT 91 also. Haven't had one myself, but not heard any bad comments about them other than they are heavier than the others. (but cheaper).
As for size, as it is a 60 size plane, you would probably be disappointed going for either the 70s in the long run. I would suggest sticking to the 90 size engines so you have enough power to help you progress.
Don't forget the TT 91 also. Haven't had one myself, but not heard any bad comments about them other than they are heavier than the others. (but cheaper).
#3
"Disappointed in the long run" with the .70FS?
Get out....
I've owned .70's for 15 years and am eagerly awaiting my first disappointment. It's not happened in all this time, but I feel better now that I know my first class ticket to "Sad City" is in the mail.
The .70 is a fabulous engine. Easy to run, and maintain.
More than enough power with a 13-7 for the Big Stick using 10% nitro fuel.
If all you want to do is "go vertical"....then buy an estes rocket.
'Race
Get out....
I've owned .70's for 15 years and am eagerly awaiting my first disappointment. It's not happened in all this time, but I feel better now that I know my first class ticket to "Sad City" is in the mail.
The .70 is a fabulous engine. Easy to run, and maintain.
More than enough power with a 13-7 for the Big Stick using 10% nitro fuel.
If all you want to do is "go vertical"....then buy an estes rocket.
'Race
#4
Senior Member
My Feedback: (50)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Mira Mesa, CA
A 60 sized plane ( 2 cycle 2) with a 70 4 stroker may be "scale" but it is always nice to have extra power, especially for sticky situations that arise..
If the weight penalty was small, and price was not a big factor I would step up to a 90- (need prop clearance though-)
Don't think you would have a ton of vertical with an OS-91, bit it'd be about right-
For V E R T I C A L throw a YS-120 on it>
Best of luck!
If the weight penalty was small, and price was not a big factor I would step up to a 90- (need prop clearance though-)
Don't think you would have a ton of vertical with an OS-91, bit it'd be about right-
For V E R T I C A L throw a YS-120 on it>
Best of luck!




