Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > IMAC
 HACKER 200 >

HACKER 200

Community
Search
Notices
IMAC Discuss IMAC style aerobatics in here

HACKER 200

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-22-2012 | 10:44 AM
  #1  
AmericanSpectre505's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Fayetteville, NC
Default HACKER 200

Anyone using a Hacker 200 in their 40% planes. I am thinking of pulling my DA-150 in my Radiowave and trying a Hacker 200?


bholsten
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Sq46323.jpg
Views:	66
Size:	101.4 KB
ID:	1803793   Click image for larger version

Name:	Kf12469.jpg
Views:	62
Size:	77.1 KB
ID:	1803794  
Old 09-28-2012 | 03:51 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Moss, NORWAY
Default RE: HACKER 200

OK, as nobody else has replied yet, I will.
I have never used a Hacker A200, so I can't comment on that particular motor.
But I use a Plettenberg Predator 37/6 in a 3.2 meter (126") wingspan own designed IMAC model.
Equipment used is Jeti SPIN 300 ESC, 12s batteries. Engel 30x14 or 30x16 propeller at about 6000 rpm.
Initially flew with 12s18Ah (3x6Ah Turnigy Nano-Tech) at 18.5 kg (40.7 lbs) flying weight. Performance was good but battery capacity marginal for two large IMAC Advanced sequences. (Old packs nearing the end of their service life.)
Later changed to 12s24Ah (3x8Ah Turnigy Nano-Tech) at 19.7 kg (43.3 lbs) flying weight. Excellent performance and plenty capacity for IMAC Advanced.
Electrics definitely works for large scale aerobatics, particularly if the airframe itself is light weight.
Good charging equipment is mandatory, though.

Regards,
Magne
Old 05-19-2013 | 06:52 AM
  #3  
AmericanSpectre505's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Fayetteville, NC
Default RE: HACKER 200

Thank you for the information.

I was just curious to see how many people were currently flying large IMAC type planes on BIG electric stuff.


Bill
Old 06-20-2013 | 06:24 AM
  #4  
MTK
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,386
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Whippany, NJ
Default RE: HACKER 200

I don't fly IMAC but have friends that do. I hear from them that many judges look down on models that don't sound like IMAC planes.
Old 06-20-2013 | 10:21 AM
  #5  
underdw's Avatar
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 384
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
From: Arvada CO
Default RE: HACKER 200

If that is the case, and the scores they give reflect it, then they are bad judges.
All other things equal, a quite electric plane should have an advantage due to the sound score/bonus system.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.