Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > IMAC
 2 Stroke or 4 Stroke >

2 Stroke or 4 Stroke

Community
Search
Notices
IMAC Discuss IMAC style aerobatics in here

2 Stroke or 4 Stroke

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-03-2007 | 03:01 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA
Default 2 Stroke or 4 Stroke

Firstly, i hope I am posting on the right forum.

I am busy building a Swallow EX90 and have the option for either a 2 stroke OS91FX with tuned pipe or a 4 stroke FS120S III.

I have no practical experience with these two motors and would value any input in this regard. I am not in the States and in our classes for pattern in my country, these are the two max size options one may use in the class I will be flying in (probably the States version of Basic class) and am situated at the coast in our country.

From what I have heard from others so far:
1. 4 stroke will give better throttle response over the range as opposed to a 2 stroke with tuned pipe.
2. down legs on maneauvres and landings will fair better with the "prop brake" provided by the 4 stroke.
3. since the FS120S III has a pump and is not reliant on exhaust back pressure, one can place the fuel tank on the CG point thus stabilising CG during flight.
4. some have said the 2 stroke will give better vertical performance???
5. Mounting the 4 stroke upside down can give idle problems (2 stroke to be mounted at a 60 degree angle)???

Your opinions would be appreciated since I am now in a quandry as to which direction to go. Cost difference between the two options is negligible

Thanks

JR
Old 03-08-2007 | 04:45 PM
  #2  
RVM
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,977
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Sacramento, CA
Default RE: 2 Stroke or 4 Stroke

1. Generally, yes a good 4-stroke will give better throttle response than a piped 2-stroke. Also, the 4-stroke will have more low-RPM torque, which could be very useful. The 4-stroke will also probably be lighter.

2. The braking is almost entirely dependent on the prop you are using.

3. You can use a regulator (Cline or Iron Bay) to accomplish the same thing. Personally, I'd go with a Saito 1.25 with an Iron Bay regulator over the OS 120 pumped. You can place the tank anywhere you want with either setup.

4. Your vertical is going to be dependent on how you prop the plane, though I would tell you that the OS120 will be able to swing a larger prop than the OS91, thus allowing for more thrust.

5. I've never ever had a problem with an inverted 4-stroke.
Old 03-08-2007 | 11:38 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Murchison, TX
Default RE: 2 Stroke or 4 Stroke

Do a search in the Pattern forum, there is lots of info on the swallow. I would opt for the 90 2 stroke+ tuned pipe, just personal preferrence. Probably lighter as well.

Just a thought but I imagine you could also use the pump/backplate from the heli version.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.