***CUB BROTHERHOOD***
#3776
My Feedback: (1)
Well, it's a lovely day in the neighborhood today! West Georgia got a break from the little cold snap of the past few days with the temp in Villa Rica reaching almost 60 degrees this afternoon. Just right for test running an engine outside the shop. Oh yes, the antique O.S. 1.20 four stroke is officially off the "boat anchor" list....IT RUNS ! I found that the exhaust valve was stuck open due to a slightly stuck pushrod. A little heat and WD-40 followed by after run oil got everything moving. I then bolted it in the new large size test stand, filled the fuel tank and hit it with the elec. starter and it made noise, good noise, it was running and quickly filled the shop (hadn't gone outside with it yet) with smoke, quickly followed by every smoke alarm in the house going off. The wife and the dog upstairs were not happy.....but I was! It took a few minutes but I got the smoke cleared and the alarm to shut up and moved the engine operation outside to the driveway. I changed to a better glo plug and ran a tank of fuel thru it, shut it off and on several times to make changes but it ran well and seems to have good power. It may get the nod to go in the Super Cub. I'll give it a good outside clean up and polish those twin rocker covers, put some sealent in a few spots that puked fuel, run it again, and get serious about measuring and fitting it to the Super Cub airframe. It will be a contest between this 1.20 and the O.S. 91 surpass as to who gets to power the new white and blue Cub. Thanks to all who responded, it helped give me direction to get this project underway.
#3777
I am getting into being a cub fanatic just got factory drawings and workingt on drawing up a 3rd scale L-21A Super Cub. man it is a pain trying to find good walkaround of the real birds frame. not to mention the dims on the top view of the factory drawings are way out of whack
#3779
#3781
#3782
And well worth it. The FG-11 has saved me at least $80 in the first year of use over a Nitro 4 stroke Saito. While the Evo shown will consume less fuel than a similar nitro 2 popper, it will still use more fuel than the Saito will. May not pay off the difference in the first year, but over its lifetime(provided you dont land wrong), it will more than make up the cost difference.
Of course there is the CDI conversion of a Nitro, but not all can be done easily, but if done, it supposedly has even greater saving over gas with more power per stroke, with similar fuel efficiency. Apparently, if I swap the carb out on my FG-11 with a glow carb, and not change anything, I can run glow through it and get more power and better efficiency. It would be easier to convert a gas 4 stroke to Glow CDI than to convert a glow to CDI.
Of course there is the CDI conversion of a Nitro, but not all can be done easily, but if done, it supposedly has even greater saving over gas with more power per stroke, with similar fuel efficiency. Apparently, if I swap the carb out on my FG-11 with a glow carb, and not change anything, I can run glow through it and get more power and better efficiency. It would be easier to convert a gas 4 stroke to Glow CDI than to convert a glow to CDI.
#3783
Senior Member
#3784
Senior Member
Of course there is the CDI conversion of a Nitro, but not all can be done easily, but if done, it supposedly has even greater saving over gas with more power per stroke, with similar fuel efficiency. Apparently, if I swap the carb out on my FG-11 with a glow carb, and not change anything, I can run glow through it and get more power and better efficiency. It would be easier to convert a gas 4 stroke to Glow CDI than to convert a glow to CDI.
The 'big blocks" aren't as easy to convert since the cylinder head/manifold interface is different for gas & glow.
And yes, you would realize about 22% more power over gas.
$20 price difference
$21.50 for FA-100 manifold
$64.95 for FA-100 carburetor
$106.45 for conversion to methanol vs $125 for CDI conversion.
Me, I would convert an FA-115 to CDI (as I am going to do) for even more power.
Last edited by SrTelemaster150; 01-08-2016 at 01:59 PM.
#3785
Well I am considering converting the two FA-100 I have to CDI at some point, once bills are caught up, in the meantime though I need to find an engine for my Citabria, so was considering another FG-11 for it. If I could find one of the newer 60 sized Saitos for a good price and have the cash, then that would also work.
This would be a good opportunity to set up my mini lathe and make some collars for the 100 and see what I can come up with. I can get aluminum stock easy enough.
This would be a good opportunity to set up my mini lathe and make some collars for the 100 and see what I can come up with. I can get aluminum stock easy enough.
#3786
John M,
#3787
Senior Member
Well I am considering converting the two FA-100 I have to CDI at some point, once bills are caught up, in the meantime though I need to find an engine for my Citabria, so was considering another FG-11 for it. If I could find one of the newer 60 sized Saitos for a good price and have the cash, then that would also work.
This would be a good opportunity to set up my mini lathe and make some collars for the 100 and see what I can come up with. I can get aluminum stock easy enough.
This would be a good opportunity to set up my mini lathe and make some collars for the 100 and see what I can come up with. I can get aluminum stock easy enough.
An FA-82 converted to CDI would make more power than an FG-14 even if you eliminated the nitro entirely. With some nitro it would rival the FG-21 in power output at the expense of fuel economy.
#3788
If you have a lathe it will reduce the cost of CDI conversion considerably. All you need for a Hall sensor mount is some 1/16" aluminum angle.
An FA-82 converted to CDI would make more power than an FG-14 even if you eliminated the nitro entirely. With some nitro it would rival the FG-21 in power output at the expense of fuel economy.
An FA-82 converted to CDI would make more power than an FG-14 even if you eliminated the nitro entirely. With some nitro it would rival the FG-21 in power output at the expense of fuel economy.
#3789
Senior Member
Thats what I was thinking too. The largest expense would be the ignition module and pickup then. Its the smaller FG-11 size that would be a pain to do just because of the smaller size collet. In that case I would just do what Saito did and put the magnet in the collet. The trick would be to place the HES since the FG-11 case has a bit more meat to it where they mount it.
A) Pin the collet to the crankshaft for positive alignment like the FG enginest,
B) make the hall sensor mount adjustable
Magnets in the collet has been tried & the problem is that the collet will shift on the initial start up. (even though it will remain as set after this initial movement) Ask Dave about it.
You can make the magnet ring as thick as needed and them shim or fabricate the hall sensor mount for clearance.
With the new generation of rare earth magnets it might be possible to affix the Hall sensor mount on top of the aluminum angle. t is no longer required to have the magnet pass within .5mm with the old generation magnets.
Also be aware that there are Saito engines that come fro the factory with aluminum collets that will NEVER hold position for ignition timeing.
Last edited by SrTelemaster150; 01-09-2016 at 09:46 AM.
#3790
Senior Member
There is also the option of using a disc to orient the magnetic poles at 90* to the propeller arc with the Hall sensor facing forward like the original "C&H Electronics" systems. That is a poor choice on smaller applications.
#3792
Senior Member
If you have a lathe, why not just go the adjustable magnet ring route? It is probably going to be the easiest in the long run. The FG-11 has the same high case "B" cam housing & cam as the FA-125 so there should be ample room for a ring thick enough to allow a set screw & magnet to be installed.. Once you tighten down the collet, it won't be easy to make adjustments. It will also be hard to build a lot of adjustment into a Hall sensor mount. With a set screw applied magnet ring you have 360* adjustment.
#3793
I believe the FG-11 uses an adjustable magnet ring on the prop drive washer, held in place with a set screw.... the prop drive washer is held by the collet on the end of the crankshaft... the magnet ring is the most commonly used method; my GF40 has a magnet ring on the prop drive washer, and the prop drive washer in keyed with a woodruff key.
When I did my Saito130, at the time CH ignition kits came with a Delrin disc that was held onto the prop drive washer with 3 set screws, and the magnet was pressed into the Delrin disc... you'll need a prop drive washer puller on the saito engines, easiy enough to make rather than purchase one.
John M,
When I did my Saito130, at the time CH ignition kits came with a Delrin disc that was held onto the prop drive washer with 3 set screws, and the magnet was pressed into the Delrin disc... you'll need a prop drive washer puller on the saito engines, easiy enough to make rather than purchase one.
John M,
#3794
Senior Member
I believe the FG-11 uses an adjustable magnet ring on the prop drive washer, held in place with a set screw.... the prop drive washer is held by the collet on the end of the crankshaft... the magnet ring is the most commonly used method; my GF40 has a magnet ring on the prop drive washer, and the prop drive washer in keyed with a woodruff key.
When I did my Saito130, at the time CH ignition kits came with a Delrin disc that was held onto the prop drive washer with 3 set screws, and the magnet was pressed into the Delrin disc... you'll need a prop drive washer puller on the saito engines, easiy enough to make rather than purchase one.
John M,
When I did my Saito130, at the time CH ignition kits came with a Delrin disc that was held onto the prop drive washer with 3 set screws, and the magnet was pressed into the Delrin disc... you'll need a prop drive washer puller on the saito engines, easiy enough to make rather than purchase one.
John M,
Was it from Riverton WY?
#3795
Yep, has "CD Electronic Ignition by C&H Electronics" silk screened on the module, brown box with yellow print... from Riverton Wyoming... I was one of the first to purchase their new modules with the "Syncro spark" stuffed inside the box, wrapped in a piece of aluminum foil, lol; which I later pop riveted a small pocket out of some flight metal on one side of the case (inside) that the syncro spark module slipped into, just to stop it from vibrating around inside the case.
The ignition coil inside the box was one that was used in some brands of lawn care gas equipment, not the tiny coil that C / H uses today.
Although the new C / H systems draw less current than its earlier predecessor, I like the coil that was originally used.
John M,
The ignition coil inside the box was one that was used in some brands of lawn care gas equipment, not the tiny coil that C / H uses today.
Although the new C / H systems draw less current than its earlier predecessor, I like the coil that was originally used.
John M,
#3796
Senior Member
Yep, has "CD Electronic Ignition by C&H Electronics" silk screened on the module, brown box with yellow print... from Riverton Wyoming... I was one of the first to purchase their new modules with the "Syncro spark" stuffed inside the box, wrapped in a piece of aluminum foil, lol; which I later pop riveted a small pocket out of some flight metal on one side of the case (inside) that the syncro spark module slipped into, just to stop it from vibrating around inside the case.
The ignition coil inside the box was one that was used in some brands of lawn care gas equipment, not the tiny coil that C / H uses today.
Although the new C / H systems draw less current than its earlier predecessor, I like the coil that was originally used.
John M,
The ignition coil inside the box was one that was used in some brands of lawn care gas equipment, not the tiny coil that C / H uses today.
Although the new C / H systems draw less current than its earlier predecessor, I like the coil that was originally used.
John M,
WOW, brown with yellow silk screening? Mine are aluminum with red. I have 3 of them, 2 singles & a twin. One of the singles has been through several crashes, one a total demolish of my Sr Telemaster. Still works! It amuses me when some question the reliability of CDI.
All of mine have '97 dates scribed on the backs. Do yours have any dates?
Last edited by SrTelemaster150; 01-10-2016 at 04:24 PM.
#3797
I don't know which came first, the aluminum with red markings, or the brown with yellow... mine have worked flawlessly as well; the ignition coils use to be available from home depot (hard to find now), all you had to do was cut the plastic mounting lugs off it, but I've never had the need to replace any of the ignition coils, still using the originals.... they are very reliable !! lol, not sure about the chinese knock offs though, cheap is cheap !
John M,
John M,
#3799
My Feedback: (6)
You can easily convert any 2 or 4 stroke glow engine to CDI and still run it on glow fuel... I converted my saito 130 twin and OS FT160 twin to glow / CDI; nice improvement in performance, reliability and fuel economy... in my opinion, very little is gained other than the cost of the fuel of course when you convert a glow engine to GAS / CDI... in the case of a gas 4 stroke, I would up the cc's to get better performance, rather than convert it to glow. John M,