Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Kit Building
Balsa USA Pheaton 40 >

Balsa USA Pheaton 40

Community
Search
Notices
Kit Building If you're building a kit and have questions or want to discuss kit building post it here.

Balsa USA Pheaton 40

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-19-2002 | 03:33 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: lockport,NY
Default Balsa USA Pheaton 40

I built a 40 size last winter.The only thing I changed was the outer rods on the wings,(cabanes),I made a set out of plywood.I had made the metal rods but I did'nt like them.I'm flying the plane with a 61 OS 4stroke.It flies beautifull and looks good too.
I made a new cowl also.I'm using a 3 blade prop,looks better on a bipe.In my humble opinion it is a very good kit aand plane.



THis thread was ment as a reply to SDM's question about the Pheaton II
Old 11-21-2002 | 04:00 PM
  #2  
SDM
My Feedback: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Cedarville, CA
Default Phaeton 40

Butchman; Is the fuse stick built or sheet balsa? Also does the kit provide
for ailerons on both the top and bottom wing? Or does it need
ailerons on top?

Thanks
Sam
Old 11-21-2002 | 04:09 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: lockport,NY
Default Pheaton II

SDM,the fuse is balsa plank.The ailerons are just on the bottom wing.It flies great with this set-up,to change to top and bottom ailerons would require a lot of changing,not worth the effort.The
plane flies good,is responsive and has that bipe look in the air.It's not a very aerobatic plane,but it is what it's suppose to be.
I thing you will be pleased with it, I know I am.

The Butchman
Old 11-22-2002 | 03:02 PM
  #4  
SDM
My Feedback: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Cedarville, CA
Default Balsa USA Pheaton 40

Thanks for the info. I ordered a kit yesterday and am looking
forward to getting it in the air. I am not sure what I am going to
use for power yet but I would like to use a 4st.

Sam
Old 11-22-2002 | 11:37 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: lockport,NY
Default Pheaton 4stroke

Sam, the only way to power a bipe is with a 4 stroke,the sound and the look of the plane floating can't be beat.Mine flys excellent with the OS61.

Good luck with it!!It goes together rather easy.

Butchman
Old 11-23-2002 | 04:37 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,769
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
From: FL
Default Balsa USA Pheaton 40

The Pheaton 40 is a great flying plane but does do best with a .60 or bigger engine. Relative incidence between the wings is critical however. A slight change in the upper wing incidence can be the difference between a real dog and a great flyer. If your initial flights are not what you like, try changing the upper wing incidence a bit, this plane seems to like about 1.5 degrees less incidence in the top wing than in the lower wing. Also be sure to put in about 3 degrees right and 3 degrees down thrust; depending on the engine, it might even need more down thrust. Mine was one of two bipes I've had that you could roll upside down and fly hands off with no elevator trim changes.
Old 11-23-2002 | 06:00 PM
  #7  
SDM
My Feedback: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Cedarville, CA
Default Balsa USA Pheaton 40

Rodney:
Thanks for the tips. I will definitely pay close
attention to those issues.

Thanks
Sam
Old 11-25-2002 | 04:09 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (21)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Wellsville, NY
Default Balsa USA Pheaton 40

I had one many years back, and flew it in some basic IMAC type competition for a little while. It had a SuperTigre 90 on the nose though. (years back Bipes had a little scoring bonus in IMAC.. not sure if that's true today though)

It was a very nice flying bipe... the Pheaton II anyway
Old 11-26-2002 | 02:01 PM
  #9  
IronCross's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NearBy, AZ
Default Balsa USA Pheaton 40

Rodney
Good info thanks. Couple of questions though. What incidence are you using on the bottom wing with referance to the horizontal stab. I am putting a Magnum .91 fs in mine. Hopefuly it two will be a great flyer.
Thanks
Roger
Old 11-26-2002 | 05:24 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,769
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
From: FL
Default Balsa USA Pheaton 40

Iron Cross, I did not measure the relative incidence between lower wing and stab, just let it come out like the plans indicated, somewhat locked in by the construction technique I think. I only played with the upper wing incidence and thrust line settings. I no longer have the plane so can not go measure it.
Old 11-26-2002 | 08:13 PM
  #11  
IronCross's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NearBy, AZ
Default Balsa USA Pheaton 40

Thanks, if I recall (been a few months since I have worked on mine :-[) the plans give no incidence or thrust measurements. The horzontal stab is more or less built in so I was using that as a refferance point..

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.