Skybolt Kit
#1
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (6)
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Mountain Home,
AR
I have long been admiring the beautiful lines of the Skybolt. I now have decided to build one from a kit. My question is concerning the differences, both up side and down side of Great Planes vs. Sig Skybolt kits. For those of you who have experience with them, which is the more honest build and then which is the more honest flyer. I know Minn has an old Sig Skybolt that has really been through the mill but he still loves it. Says something about the Sig kit. I just wondered how the Great Planes kit compares. Any ideas welcomed. Thanks, guys.
Max
Max
#2
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
The Sig is a bit smaller, and without doubt the more complex of the two to build. Although, from what I've read about building the GP, if you want a building project either one will keep you occupied for a while...
I have flown two GP SkyBolts; I actually prefer the Ultimate. One of the two was definitely overweight, and a handful. The other one was quite decent and very pretty in the air; enough so to convince me that I wanted one.
I've got a NIB Sig SkyBolt kit, with a newly-purchased extra set of plans, laying idle. PM me if you're interested. My interests have changed.
I have flown two GP SkyBolts; I actually prefer the Ultimate. One of the two was definitely overweight, and a handful. The other one was quite decent and very pretty in the air; enough so to convince me that I wanted one.
I've got a NIB Sig SkyBolt kit, with a newly-purchased extra set of plans, laying idle. PM me if you're interested. My interests have changed.
#4
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Antelope Valley,
CA
I bought the GP kit and love it! I'm a week away from maiden flight. Several of us are building the GP Skybolt over in the beginners section.
Join the club: [link=http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_3561097/mpage_19/tm.htm]GP Skybolt Thread[/link]
Mods
Join the club: [link=http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_3561097/mpage_19/tm.htm]GP Skybolt Thread[/link]
Mods
#5
Mods,
Beginners and Skybolts??? I hope that you are beginning builders and not beginning flyers. The Skybolt is NOT a good second or even third airplane. It (IMHO) is a double handful to fly. It needs speed to land. If you cut power too early, mine had a MOSLER glide ratio. MOSLER being a Safe (as in a bank safe) Of course, that sort of thing keeps the old adrenal gland working well. Just my opinion.
Beginners and Skybolts??? I hope that you are beginning builders and not beginning flyers. The Skybolt is NOT a good second or even third airplane. It (IMHO) is a double handful to fly. It needs speed to land. If you cut power too early, mine had a MOSLER glide ratio. MOSLER being a Safe (as in a bank safe) Of course, that sort of thing keeps the old adrenal gland working well. Just my opinion.
#7
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Antelope Valley,
CA
ORIGINAL: balsabandit
Mods,
Beginners and Skybolts??? I hope that you are beginning builders and not beginning flyers. The Skybolt is NOT a good second or even third airplane. It (IMHO) is a double handful to fly. It needs speed to land. If you cut power too early, mine had a MOSLER glide ratio. MOSLER being a Safe (as in a bank safe) Of course, that sort of thing keeps the old adrenal gland working well. Just my opinion.
Mods,
Beginners and Skybolts??? I hope that you are beginning builders and not beginning flyers. The Skybolt is NOT a good second or even third airplane. It (IMHO) is a double handful to fly. It needs speed to land. If you cut power too early, mine had a MOSLER glide ratio. MOSLER being a Safe (as in a bank safe) Of course, that sort of thing keeps the old adrenal gland working well. Just my opinion.
Mods





