Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Kit Building
 another sad day for kitbuilding. >

another sad day for kitbuilding.

Community
Search
Notices
Kit Building If you're building a kit and have questions or want to discuss kit building post it here.

another sad day for kitbuilding.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-07-2008 | 08:54 PM
  #26  
iron eagel's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Middleboro, MA
Default RE: another sad day for kitbuilding.

So few guys build anymore, everyone wants the arf to get in the air fast these days. Kits sit on the shelf taking up space ,and gathering dust, the merchants can use that space for the fast selling arfs so the kits start to be dropped by them.
Thankfully there are a lot of kit cutters such as wingspan stepping up to fill the void but they to will vanish unless we order from them.
I have over a dozen kits in the to be built que right now, but I am going to pick up a few more just in case.....

Then again as others have suggested building from plans is not all that hard. And I do have a stack of those also....

The only way we can keep kits on the market is to buy and build them, so get busy....
Old 03-07-2008 | 08:56 PM
  #27  
ramcfarland's Avatar
My Feedback: (44)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,791
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Waldorf , MD
Default RE: another sad day for kitbuilding.

Well we must think positive[:-]
Old 03-07-2008 | 11:23 PM
  #28  
sscherin's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Eugene, Or
Default RE: another sad day for kitbuilding.

I don't know why people are trashing on the Lanier Kits..

I just got a 81" Cap 323 kit and it's really nice..
All laser cut lite ply.. one piece fuse sides.. good wing cores..

About the only thing I can complain about is the ABS Cowl..

For $129 it's a deal that can't be beat..

I've always been a kit or scratch builder.. Might try an ARF someday.. not today..
Old 03-08-2008 | 11:14 AM
  #29  
CrateCruncher's Avatar
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 949
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Austin, TX
Default RE: another sad day for kitbuilding.

Sscherin, you got a great deal but it was a closeout price and unsustainable - Tower lost money. I and others felt Lanier's street prices were too high for the contents of the kits and they didn't sell well. Its a vicious circle in every declining industry. Costs (and street prices) go up as volumes decline. Eventually, only the specialist niches (like giant scale) are left because ARF importers can't justify the low volume and high freight costs.

My great grandmother baked her own bread. Around 1920 her local bakery began making it for her because there were enough families in the area to support him. She loved the convenience. Her daughter got married and ran her house the same way mom did. Only this time she bought bread through necessity. The simple skill of bread making had been lost.

Today at my field everyone flies ARF's. The older guys do it for convenience. The new guys do it through necessity. By publishing an interesting build thread we can restore some of the skill-sets being lost. It doesn't take long for several thousand hits to accumulate on a good thread. As more home-built planes begin showing up at local fields the interest could create a sustainable chain reaction. Maybe I'm just dreaming but through the power of the internet we can restore some of whats being lost.
Old 03-08-2008 | 11:52 AM
  #30  
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,985
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: pembroke, NH
Default RE: another sad day for kitbuilding.

alot of the lanier problem dates back to the 70's when the first came out with the arf line.The plastic fuselages did not hold up to a seasons flying.granted they have improved but the memmories of the earlier kits are still with us
Old 03-08-2008 | 07:50 PM
  #31  
iron eagel's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Middleboro, MA
Default RE: another sad day for kitbuilding.


ORIGINAL: CrateCruncher

Sscherin, you got a great deal but it was a closeout price and unsustainable - Tower lost money. I and others felt Lanier's street prices were too high for the contents of the kits and they didn't sell well. Its a vicious circle in every declining industry. Costs (and street prices) go up as volumes decline. Eventually, only the specialist niches (like giant scale) are left because ARF importers can't justify the low volume and high freight costs.

My great grandmother baked her own bread. Around 1920 her local bakery began making it for her because there were enough families in the area to support him. She loved the convenience. Her daughter got married and ran her house the same way mom did. Only this time she bought bread through necessity. The simple skill of bread making had been lost.

Today at my field everyone flies ARF's. The older guys do it for convenience. The new guys do it through necessity. By publishing an interesting build thread we can restore some of the skill-sets being lost. It doesn't take long for several thousand hits to accumulate on a good thread. As more home-built planes begin showing up at local fields the interest could create a sustainable chain reaction. Maybe I'm just dreaming but through the power of the internet we can restore some of whats being lost.

I think you are right about this!

Old 03-09-2008 | 01:04 PM
  #32  
Craig-RCU's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: minneapolis, MN
Default RE: another sad day for kitbuilding.

ORIGINAL: CrateCruncher

Sscherin, you got a great deal but it was a closeout price and unsustainable - Tower lost money. I and others felt Lanier's street prices were too high for the contents of the kits and they didn't sell well. Its a vicious circle in every declining industry. Costs (and street prices) go up as volumes decline. Eventually, only the specialist niches (like giant scale) are left because ARF importers can't justify the low volume and high freight costs.

My great grandmother baked her own bread. Around 1920 her local bakery began making it for her because there were enough families in the area to support him. She loved the convenience. Her daughter got married and ran her house the same way mom did. Only this time she bought bread through necessity. The simple skill of bread making had been lost.

Today at my field everyone flies ARF's. The older guys do it for convenience. The new guys do it through necessity. By publishing an interesting build thread we can restore some of the skill-sets being lost. It doesn't take long for several thousand hits to accumulate on a good thread. As more home-built planes begin showing up at local fields the interest could create a sustainable chain reaction. Maybe I'm just dreaming but through the power of the internet we can restore some of whats being lost.
I disagree that the daughter of a bread baking mother bought her bread ONLY because of neccesity. The truth is that there is real advantage to a society when members of that society specialise in a trade. That advantage is called efficiency, so the mother who buys her bread instead of baking it herself takes advantage of that efficiency. The truth is that nobody can produce a loaf of bread in small quantities as efficiently as they can produce bread in large quantities. This results in a net saving of time that allows the members of a society enough free time to pursue other activities such as the hobby of radio control aircraft for example. If it weren't for the efficiency of mass production, we would all be too busy hunting for our super with home-built spears instead of being able to enjoy leisure activities such as R/C flying. While older guys might be able to produce a scratch or kit-built aircraft faster than a person who has yet to learned those skills, neither can produce an aircraft near as fast as an assembly line factory, so both take advantage of efficiency of specialisation to such a large degree that it dwarfs any advantage that experienced scratch or kit-building has over inexperienced scratch or kit building.

As far as mourning the loss of kits goes, todays kits are themselves a shortcut to getting a plane in the air when compared to creating your own plans from scratch, so complaining about the loss of kits to buy seems a bit arbitrary to me. You may complain that others are killing the hobby of R/C aircraft by buying arfs, but there is an equally compelling argument that taking the shortcut of buying a kit instead of drawing up your own plans is an equally heretical path to enjoying the hobby of R/C aircraft. This hobby was not built on complaints. It was built on the love of aircraft. You couldn't even buy pre-built R/C equipment when this hobby began, so I think it is necessary to maintain some perspective here.
Old 03-09-2008 | 02:22 PM
  #33  
somegeek's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Vancouver, WA
Default RE: another sad day for kitbuilding.

It's all relative... old timer scratch builders could probably scoff at folks building kits and assembling ARFs... I guess the really super hard core avoid any shortcuts and grow their own balsa.

These days, being a kit/scratch builder at the field means belonging to a small number of folks unfortunately which seems to lead to the LHS carrying squat for materials. I've learned to get everything online as the LHS takes a few weeks sometimes to get stuff in when requested and the good shops are roughly 30-45 minutes away.

somegeek
Old 03-09-2008 | 02:37 PM
  #34  
CrateCruncher's Avatar
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 949
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Austin, TX
Default RE: another sad day for kitbuilding.

Craig, I wasn't bad-mouthing ARF's or the industry. Frankly ARF's create better access for people to enter the hobby and we all benefit from that through lower prices, better selection, more flying sites, etc. Efficiency and specialization play a role in ones professional occupation certainly. But my point was that hobbies like R/C (or baking) are done for the pleasure of the experience. When we relegate more of the experience to someone else we rob ourselves of pleasure. Few things smell as wonderful as a house where bread is baking. When we take the convenience route it leads to a net loss in skills and the pleasure factor. People I know who fly ARF's go through planes so fast I seldom see the same plane twice at my field. Partly because they can't repair them (skill loss) and partly because they lose interest as soon as they see it fly a few times (no sense of accomplishment).

True, picking kits looks arbitrary but only a fraction of folks will ever have sufficient interest or discipline to learn the skills needed for success in model airplane design. It is a hobby after all. Kits seem to me a good compromise on the commitment/accomplishment curve.

(BTW, specialization works great until the environment changes. Suddenly that specialization isn't worth a warm bucket of spit. Rats and cockroaches aren't on the endangered list for a reason.)
Old 03-09-2008 | 07:21 PM
  #35  
mred33's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Glenwood, GA
Default RE: another sad day for kitbuilding.

I love the guys that buy ARFs and can't repair them. I have gotten three free planes that way and could have had more, but didn't like the plane and someone else finally got it and took it home with them. I started building planes when Gillows was printing parts on the wood and went from there. The one thing that I REALLY miss is the kits that are no longer in production and no plans for them like the Pulsair Bipe that I would almost kill for right now. If I had known then what I know now, I would have bought a pile of kits like that and saved them for later when I had a need or time to build them. I love to build and ALWAYS have at least one going or maybe three. I scratch build, ( doing plans and everything) build from plans, build from kit cutters, or build kits. I bought a couple ARFs, but never really liked them as much as ones I built myself. I love to paint and don't mind flim, but for a REALLY nice plane, I paint it. I'm doing a King Altair that was cut by Jeff and I must say that is one of the best kits I have ever had the joy to build. I plan to die with a plane on my building board and I don't care where it came from as long as I can build something. Unless they stop selling balsa, I am going to be building something. My worry is that they will stop selling blasa because there is no demand for it. As long as they are selling balsa I will be building and very happy doing it. Love it and I try and get others interested in building too.
Ed
Old 03-10-2008 | 07:41 PM
  #36  
My Feedback: (35)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Chesterton, IN
Default RE: another sad day for kitbuilding.

When we look at the reasons for the success of the ARF, we must look partially at the kit industry itself. Those who can remember, go back to the '60s through the '80s and play the program ALL THE WAY THROUGH. Yes, there were lots of kits back then and everybody built. Remember what those kits were like? Yes, there were good ones, but there were a lot that were mediocre to downright poor. The term "die crunched" didn't get into the modeler's vocabulary for nothing. Many kits were poorly cut, parts didn't fit, plans were inaccurate, wood quality was bad and instructions were laughable. Many, many kits were started and then abandoned long before they were ever completed. Those that were completed often did not fly well due to built-in warps and curves that weren't supposed to be there. Is there any wonder that many people embraced the ARF?
When the ARFs started coming in, the kit manufacturers with enough business acumen to see the threat started to improve their products. The result is that many of the kits we have today are vastly improved from even a few years ago. Laser cutting, advances in die cutting technology, CAD drawn plans, attention to wood quality and clarity of instructions make many of today's kits a joy to build, and easy to get straight and accurate. They actually fly very well. It's too bad that preconceived notions spawned by the experiences of a decade or two ago are turning many people away from building.
The manufacturers who improved their kits will probably stay in business. Those who don't will fold. That's the way business goes. If those of us who love to build keep buying kits, we'll have a good supply into the future. If kits don't survive, then there's always the drawing board, plans and the woodpile.

papermache
Old 03-10-2008 | 10:24 PM
  #37  
iron eagel's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Middleboro, MA
Default RE: another sad day for kitbuilding.

Building with new laser cut balsa is nice and the kits I have built have gone together very quickly. Some of the kits in the old days you had to do a lot of cutting because you had to replace parts that were not usable, or the die did not cut all the way through. But making your own patters and shaping all of your own parts can be fun also, especially when it come out nice, or flies well. But it takes time, and for some having time to build is not an option, and arfs fill that need for them.

I agree with this statement.

"The manufacturers who improved their kits will probably stay in business. Those who don't will fold. That's the way business goes. If those of us who love to build keep buying kits, we'll have a good supply into the future. If kits don't survive, then there's always the drawing board, plans and the woodpile." made by papermache
Old 03-11-2008 | 07:24 AM
  #38  
gboulton's Avatar
My Feedback: (15)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: La Vergne, TN
Default RE: another sad day for kitbuilding.

**CAUTION : LESS EXPERIENCED BUILDER ABOUT TO GO ON A LONG RANT - VIEW AT YOUR OWN RISK**

Ok...I admit...I'm a good bit "newer' to this hobby than many of you. And I certainly don't mean to offend anyone here...but it seems that many of the builders I encounter are builders because "back in my day, that was the only way you got an airplane. there weren't any ARFs!" Hey, kudos to you and all. And, WITHOUT A DOUBT, some of you are amongst the finest craftsmen I've ever encountered.

But I wonder if, perhaps, the outlook might be a bit different if you learned to build by CHOICE rather than necessity. Here's why:

Despite my mere ~4 years in this hobby, I'm a builder myself. By no means as accomplished as many in this thread (nor, i suspect, will I EVER be), but I CAN point to my avatar with more than a little pride and say "That's a scratch built 33% Pitts Bulldog". And ya know what? For me, that is the joy of building. It's mine. I know every stick of wood in it, I know every bit of engineering and finish (the good AND the bad), and when it's flying around, it is my creation.

That being said, however...I'm an aviation nut first. I don't care if it's a rocket, a helicopter, an airplane, an ornithopter, a bumblebee, or a freakishly overpowered playhouse on Master Blasters...if it flies, it's cool. If someone has fun flying it, it's doubly cool.

For that reason, despite being "a builder", I'm not only "ok" with the market dominance of ARFs, I rather encourage it.

Do you learn something different, or perhaps think differently about an ARF? Absolutely. Are you inherently less respectful of your airplane, or less worthy of it, simply because it's an ARF? Absolutely not.

Sure...we'll find folks who are disrespectful of their equipment, or that of others. And, I grant, they're more likely to be flying an ARF, because that sort of person doesn't usually have the patience to build. And I suppose it's even fair to say that ARFs have 'let that guy into the hobby" where, without them, he'd have never seen our field.

But ya know? For every one of him, there's at LEAST one guy who flies ARFs rather than builds simply because HE'D RATHER SPEND HIS TIME FLYING. What about that guy? He's happily married, has a couple of kids, and works his *** off at 2 jobs to support them. He thinks airplanes are cool, but his 3 br apartment simply doesn't have the SPACE to build, and frankly, he's dog tired when he gets home. He just wants to go fly for an hour or so and relax from the day. What does THAT guy bring to the field?

He's respectful. He is the prototypical "good, hardworking, honest person"
His airplanes are well assembled and maintained. He's learned a bit of respect for himself and his belongings over the years.
He flies safely and well - See that whole respect thing.
He brings a MUCH wider variety of airplanes to the field MUCH more quickly than we builders could. In the year it takes us to finish 2, he could purchase 4-5. He exposes more people to more types of aircraft quicker.
He's FLYING, and having FUN doing it.
Heck...he quite possibly brings those 2 kids with him. Sure, they're something of a hand-full at times...but they are children learning to enjoy aviation....and that can not possibly be a bad thing.

Don't get me wrong...I love building. I'm no master craftsman, but I'm getting better at it every time I build (in large part thanks to some of the kind folks around here), and enjoying the learning process. And, certainly, I take some very personal joys away from each airplane I complete. I have emotional ties to "my" aircraft (one in particular) I could never form with an ARF. So, by no means am I suggesting that ARFs are the be all and end all of this hobby.

But, for all the "bad" they may expose, or have brought to our hobby, they HAVE brought GOOD people into it that simply couldn't or wouldn't be flying otherwise. They are, to date, THE most effective way to spread a love of aviation to "Joe Average" and his kids.

Quite simply...while we, as builders, may represent the "origins" of our hobby, ARFs are keeping it alive and spreading it. And I, for one, am thankful for that.
Old 03-11-2008 | 12:43 PM
  #39  
Bigshark's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 433
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
From: St. Louis, MO
Default RE: another sad day for kitbuilding.

"if it flys, it is cool"

I agree with that statement to the max!


As a kit builder of no great skill though, I do have a problem with the mags available on the news stand not talking at all about kits or even liquid fuel powered beasts. I was sequestered on jury duty recently and bought a copy of Fly RC to read. There was nothing I'd have any interest in buying in the entire fricking magazine. I'll never glance at another copy, ever.

I don't have any love for Lanier as most of their kits seemed to be foam core wings and skinning balsa over foam is a skill I've never learned and have little desire to try.

Building Hobby Lobby's Telemaster and 3 Skimmers, Dynaflight's Talon, Great Planes Spirit Elite, Sig's Four Star 120 have taught me enough that now I feel I could stratch build or certainly build from plans. I've also flown some GWS styrobirds and learned to fly on a slowstick that I still have.


As long as Aerocraft keeps making Teles and Skimmers and Sig keeps cranking out Four Stars, and GP keeps making Spirits and spectras, and Top Flight keeps making warbirds at least until I'm competant to fly one, and Sky bench keeps making Frank Ziacs stuff and Olympics till I get around to it, Ill be a happy man. I'm not asking for much!
Old 03-11-2008 | 05:57 PM
  #40  
gboulton's Avatar
My Feedback: (15)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: La Vergne, TN
Default RE: another sad day for kitbuilding.


ORIGINAL: Bigshark

"if it flys, it is cool"

I agree with that statement to the max!
*shrug* To me, that's REALLY the only thing that SHOULD matter.

I mean, the jerk who has no respect for himself or others...the ARF didn't make him that way. He was already 'that guy'. Is the ARF what brought him out to our field? Yeah, probably. But ya know, it brought that incredibly cool guy too. And...let's face it...the first guy probably won't last long anyway.

I don't have any love for Lanier as most of their kits seemed to be foam core wings and skinning balsa over foam is a skill I've never learned and have little desire to try.
I've been blessed to learn some real tricks along those lines from some of the best in the industry. If you're ever curious, hit me up. Can't say I'm the be-all and end-all of foam wing sheeting, but I ain't the worst at it either. nce you learn some pretty basic tricks, it's a BREEZE, and you can produce some VERY light and strong wings.

Sorry about the off-topic diversion.

Building Hobby Lobby's Telemaster and 3 Skimmers, Dynaflight's Talon, Great Planes Spirit Elite, Sig's Four Star 120 have taught me enough that now I feel I could stratch build or certainly build from plans.
My first scratch build came with a heck of a lot less experience than that. I'd wager you'd blow me away!

As a kit builder of no great skill though, I do have a problem with the mags available on the news stand not talking at all about kits or even liquid fuel powered beasts.
I've heard this lament more times than I can count in my admittedly VERY brief "career" as a modeler...and i always think the same thing. Now, hey...being the newb I am, maybe I'm out to lunch here and I'm sure the more experienced guys in this thread will point it out if I am (StickBuilder excels at that sort of thing ime *heh*)

Now, I HAVE to believe that, as many assert, it is indeed more difficult to find particular building tools, accessories, or resources at, say the LHS. Obviously, with only 4 yrs 'experience', I don't really have much comparison, but it only makes sense that it would be so.

But I HAVE to think that, in some ways, kit building has become MUCH easier of late.

One fellow I fly with is a MASTER builder (with some titles to "prove" it) and his work is nothing short of true art. Details I could only dream of creating, and a skill and passion for building beyond anything I can imagine ever attaining. When I talk to him about some of his magnificent models he will share stories of MONTHS of research to find JUST the right picture or documentation to model detail X.

It struck me recently, as I was researching my current P-51 build, that I've sure as HECK got an easier way to go. What might have taken him months to track down through letter writing, visits to obscure libraries and museums, and perhaps a phone call or twelve, I can find in a few days worth of judicious google usage, a few posts in forums, and some e-mails. Heck, in less than a month, I've got more photo documentation for my Mustang on a removable thumb drive than he'll EVER have for some of his airplanes...and none of it cost me a dime.

So hey...yeah, there's some things that are "more difficult', but we've got some advantages as well. The research into a particular aircraft or pilot has become one of the most enjoyable parts of a build for me...part of that 'soul' (again, credit to StickBuilder) a build has.

So...you know...the ARF guys can use the internet to order QQ's latest *******ization of the noble Yak. We get to use it to find out why some P-51 pilot on Iwo Jima got the nickname "loopy".
Old 03-11-2008 | 06:23 PM
  #41  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bakersfield, CA
Default RE: another sad day for kitbuilding.

I suspect we will have to go to "Cottage Industry" LZ cut short kits. In SAM, over 100 of the Old Time Short Kits are available for both FF and RC from a variety of suppliers. Some of the short kits have a wingspan of over 100 inches and sell for $40-$160 including excellent full size plans and shipping.

Ralph

Will Hobbico bring back the kits after re-tooling in Illinois? Or were the aquisitions merely to eliminate some mainstream competition to make way for more lucrative ARF's, and the kits are never to be seen again? I hope they do come back.

This entire scenario is giving me some pretty bad feelings for the industry in general for the near future.

Old 03-11-2008 | 06:29 PM
  #42  
RAMMJETT's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
From: NOBEL, ON, CANADA
Default RE: another sad day for kitbuilding.

i think we can live with both types of building .i love to scratch build but find my self getting a bit to emotinally involved to have fun flying it. thats were the arf comes in for me.dont get me wrong i love to build and fly my scratch stuff.but i feel a littel easier taking chances with a arf.i think unfortunally the kits days are numbered.they were a great steeping stone for me.but you cant git rid of scratch building its been around longer than hobby stores.
Old 03-11-2008 | 08:01 PM
  #43  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Wethersfield, CT
Default RE: another sad day for kitbuilding.

I have a very interesting story about a kit cutter. I have been looking for a kit foe a while now. Went to the WRAM show and found Precision Cut Kits. After asking a load of questions I decided with Larry's help on a 81" Chipmunk. His wife took my CC info and address to send me the "Deluxe" portion. (canopy, landing gear,tail wheel, cowl). Now some of the amazing parts about PCK......... the quality is awsome. I have not seen wood this good in many years!!! They did not have a machine to charge my card and yet I walked out with almost $500. worth of kit! (Hmmm would Tower do that?????) and my Deluxe parts showed up 2 week later as promised. If you are looking for a kit give Precision Cut Kits a look, the list is huge (they must of had 50 different kits at the show) and the quality can't be beat!
Old 03-13-2008 | 11:22 AM
  #44  
gboulton's Avatar
My Feedback: (15)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: La Vergne, TN
Default RE: another sad day for kitbuilding.

So it's "one of those days" where my mind is somewhere between 'here' (wherever that is) and, oh...Mars or something. For whatever reason, as i was choking on exhaust fumes in traffic this morning, the following sorta sprang to life. Figured this thread was as good as any to share it.

Field Guide to North American Aeromodeler identification

Aeromodelers frequently travel in small groups, known by their scientific name of "groups". Social Hierarchical Organization Behaviour (SHOB) has also been observed in some cases, leading to the formation of more advanced groups known as "clubs". For these reasons, it is often difficult to correctly identify specific Aeromodelers. This brief identification guide is thus presented as a handy field resource for those wishing to observe this magnificent creature in its natural habitat.

There are 2 primary families of aeromodelers. The Builder family (Woodus Sandandphillius), and the ARFer family (Assemblius Andflyus). Each is then broken down into various Genuses and Species.

Members of the Woodus Sandandphillius family can usually be identified by the sandy brown color of their plumage. The coloring will appear to be mottled and "dusty", owing to the regular absorption of various wood particulates. Assemblius Andflyus members will rarely share this coloring.

"Builders" will also frequently exhibit a higher percentage of digital anomalies from the standard 5 "fingers" of the parent order. Observers are cautioned, however, against using this to make a positive identification, as such anomolies can not always accurately be attributed to the correct cause, and both families share some causes. If close observation can be made, then the observer will note that while both families may suffer the effects of PBS (Prop-Biting Syndrome), only the Builder family will also display symptoms of DCAF (Dangit, CA is Fast), a rare condition that results in the temporary joining or "binding" together of digits. Again, the observer is cautioned to careful examination, where possible, as such digital binding could also be a by-product of PBS treatment. In this case, however, some sort of wrapping material will be evident, where no such material is present in cases of DCAF.

Once proper familial identification has been made, the observer should then attempt to fuirther classify the Aeromodeler by Genus and Species.

The Genuses within Woods Sandandphillius are too numerous to cover completely in a small guide such as this, but the most commonly noted are -Scratchus and -Kittus. Within the community of taxonomists, a third genus, -Fromplanius, is being considered, but there is debate about whether it is its own Genus, or merely a subgenus of -Scratchus.

Distinction between the two genuses can prove very difficult, as the differences are not easily observed by the untrained evaluator. Perhaps the most obvious distinction is that -Scratchus (Builder - Scratch) members are seen in thie field less often than their -Kittus counterparts, owing to the extended time they spend in their lair. One may expect to see the -Kittus member in the field 3-4 times a year, while a -Scratchus member may frequently go 18-24 months between excursions.

When seen, -Scratchus members are frequently observed with extraneous baggage, known as "Docu-Mentayshun" (First described by Dr Albert Docu and his graduate student, Froedrick Mentayshun, in 1954). Careful examination of said Docu-Mentayshun will often reveal cryptic writings, crude drawings, and numerous photographs of similar vehicles.

-Kittus members may also be seen with similar detritus surrounding them, but such observations will not be as consistent, and frequently there will not be as much Docu-Mentayshun evident.

Within the Andflyus family, the genuses are much more easily identified. Again, they number too great for a small field companion volume, but the more common ones are -QQFanboyus, -DADisciplius, and -GoAwayOldFartius. identification can easily be made based on color scheme, frequency of service/support activities, the presence of 'garbage' (symptomatic of ThreeDee Oopsius disease, common with the family), and the volume and shrillness of the genus's voice. Owing to the commonality and lack of significant diversity within family ARF, further identification is neither warranted nor enjoyable.

Finally, -Kittus and -Scratchus genuses each break down to specific species. While each family may contain members of the same species, certain species are more prevalent within one genus or the other. Such species include, but are not limited to, -Warbirdius, -Bipiens, -Sporticus, and -Trainorius.

Finally, as motivation to the beginning observer, we encourage you to seek out and identify the rarest member of the -Sandandphillius family, Woodus Sandandphillius-Scratchus-Reptillius. Rarely seen, but easily identified by the presence of exquisite scales, this "Scale Master" variety is a treat to behold.

We hope you find this guide useful in your observation and pursuit of the North American Aeromodeler. As your experience with these majestic creatures grows, you may also find our "Observer's guide to Aeromodeler interaction" useful.
Old 03-13-2008 | 11:44 AM
  #45  
somegeek's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Vancouver, WA
Default RE: another sad day for kitbuilding.

ORIGINAL: RAMMJETT
i think we can live with both types of building .i love to scratch build but find my self getting a bit to emotionally involved to have fun flying it.
Glad to hear I am not the only one there... felt apprehensive about the maidens on a few of my planes due to this. :P

somegeek
Old 03-13-2008 | 11:48 AM
  #46  
RAMMJETT's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
From: NOBEL, ON, CANADA
Default RE: another sad day for kitbuilding.

good stuff must have been a long drive.think you overlooked the PRETXASORAS.LOL
Old 03-13-2008 | 11:59 AM
  #47  
gboulton's Avatar
My Feedback: (15)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: La Vergne, TN
Default RE: another sad day for kitbuilding.


ORIGINAL: RAMMJETT
good stuff must have been a long drive.
Unusually so, owing to some idiot deciding that a school zone was a great place to pull out in front of another car and get t-boned.
Old 03-13-2008 | 12:11 PM
  #48  
RAMMJETT's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
From: NOBEL, ON, CANADA
Default RE: another sad day for kitbuilding.

some geek.yeah its not even about the money thow i hate to throw it away.something about putting in all that love .and most guys at this stage are really good fliers.i have even had my friend fly my planes for the first time knowing i was the mutch better pilot.go figure
Old 03-13-2008 | 12:21 PM
  #49  
RAMMJETT's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
From: NOBEL, ON, CANADA
Default RE: another sad day for kitbuilding.

feel your pain dude take the same idiot add in a foot of snow.you get the picture i would have to wright a novel
Old 03-13-2008 | 12:30 PM
  #50  
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,990
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Levittown, PA
Default RE: another sad day for kitbuilding.

My favorite kit provider's product list keeps getting bigger, bigger, and bigger, adding various new models every year. As long as they stay alive, I'm happy. GO BALSA USA!!!!

Gerry


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.