Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Kit Building
Reload this Page >

Light Covering Weights

Community
Search
Notices
Kit Building If you're building a kit and have questions or want to discuss kit building post it here.

Light Covering Weights

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-05-2003, 11:23 AM
  #1  
lagCisco
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: AU
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Light Covering Weights

I'm building a few aircraft that require light covering, they (combined) call for either Nelson Film, SoLite, Ultracote Light, or Mylar, I'd like to know what these covering materials weight in at maybe the sq/yard or sq/foot..

also, I saw Econocote from TopFlite, it says its light weight and low temp, anyone know much about Econocote or any other light weight covering films?
Old 09-06-2003, 12:16 AM
  #2  
Moa
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Wellington, NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Light Covering Weights

Greetings

Check out the thread "Light Coverings" . There is a bunch of useful weights and links to weight information there.
Old 09-06-2003, 12:45 AM
  #3  
DBCherry
My Feedback: (4)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hubbardston, MA
Posts: 5,550
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Light Covering Weights

I have a chart with dozens of materials listed. Pm me with your email address if interested and I'll send it to you. (It's a Word Doc.)

Here's a couple examples:

Solite 20.44 grams/meter .603 oz/sq. yard
RA Microlite 11.9 " " .351
Litespan 28.8 .850
" dark colors 30.0 .885
Ultracote 36.67 1.08
Monokote 75.3 2.22
" trnsparent 57.07 1.68

Dennis-
Old 09-06-2003, 02:53 AM
  #4  
Lightfoot
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: MS
Posts: 3,785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Light Covering Weights

There is a chart on my web page that has weights of a lot of coverings. I don't know how accurate they are but I went to many different sources, primarily the manufacturers web pages, to try to get good information.

Howard
Old 09-06-2003, 10:56 AM
  #5  
MinnFlyer
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
MinnFlyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Willmar, MN
Posts: 28,519
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default Light Covering Weights

I wouldn't use Econocote if it were free.
Old 09-09-2003, 03:12 AM
  #6  
Dream_Flyer
My Feedback: (7)
 
Dream_Flyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: PB145, TX
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Light Covering Weights

Hmmmmmmmm I guess what I said got lost in the shuffle? Well that is the way the WEB goes lol still sticky
Old 09-10-2003, 06:34 PM
  #7  
Rick Lindsey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: SAnta Barbara, CA,
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Light Covering Weights

Hrm... Is "1/2 oz. glass cloth" 1/2 oz/ per square yard? I've been considering a foamie type slope soarer, but I think I might want to glass it rather than use ultracote, if it's not too heavy. At 1/2oz per square yard, I'd still have quite a bit of elbow-room for polycrylic and maybe even a bit of paint before it gets heavier than ultracote's 2.3oz per square yard.
Old 11-16-2003, 02:26 AM
  #8  
DUMTHUM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Light <span class=

Yes, I am pretty sure it is 1/2 ounce / Sq yard. Most foamie slope soarers I know of are covered with packing tape and filament tape underneath. The filament tape is required for rigidity in the wing and fuse. I am not sure you would get the same kind of strength from 1/2 ounce FG. I have used it on a blue foam project and it is very wispy stuff. But, blue foam is very rigid to begin with, and I think the FG was more for abrasion and preventing cracking the foam than for rigidity. I could be wrong, but I think a heavier FG would be required. Also, if you've never used FG before, it requires probably more resin than you think, thereby negating your weight savings. I suppose if you want to know for sure, find a very accurate scale, and mock up a square foot of material, and weigh it before and after the covering. The difference is the weight of your covering. It would be interesting to see the difference in weight for different resins as well. Be sure to include any coats of paint you will need as well.

Also, if you use epoxy for your resin, be sure to use the finishing resin as it is much thinner and easier to use. Sometimes it can even be too thick for very light FG. Use a squeegee to get the excess resin out of the cloth. Read a book called "Canoe Craft", it has a great treatise on applying glass and epoxy resin to canoes, and the info applies directly to the use of it over wings.

I'm not sure, but I think you can dye epoxy resin and possibly eliminate coats of paint on your model. West Systems would probably have this info.

Having said all that, most slopers have fairly high wing loadings and unless you just want to build it for the lightest wind conditions possible I think the covering would make a negligible difference. Use what is easiest, most cost efficient, and most importantly, most appropriate for the application. ie if your plane is EPP foam and you fiberglass it , the FG will crack when you crash it because the foam will compress then rebound yet the rigid FG won't. Whereas, packing tape and filament tape will give with the foam. In any case, good luck.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.