Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Kit Building
c-g problem >

c-g problem

Community
Search
Notices
Kit Building If you're building a kit and have questions or want to discuss kit building post it here.

c-g problem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-15-2002 | 10:57 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Cornwall, UNITED KINGDOM
Default c-g problem

Hi folks,

I am just putting the finishing touches to a model, it is a Modeltech VASP, 60" span pattern ship. The c-g is indicated to be 7 inches back from the LE, but I am too nose heavy, must be the heavy MVVS 49 lump up front.

By moving the battery pack half way down the tail and adding 4oz of ballast at the tailwhell I can get it to balance, but this brings the auw to about 7lbs. The destructions don't give any idea of what the auw should be, so a quick wing loading calc gives a figure of 27oz/sqft. This is the first time I have done this calc and I have not included the wing area that is coverd by the fus.

I have no idea what sort of wing loading figures I should be looking at, other than as low as possible.

Ideas or advice,

Cheers,

Chris
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	5888_2467.jpg
Views:	29
Size:	22.1 KB
ID:	4379  
Old 03-19-2002 | 09:33 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Kamloops, BC, CANADA
Default c-g problem

Wing loadings can be deceptive. The only time you want a low wing loading is on a floater ie: glider or trainer.

I figure at that 27 ounces per SQ. FT. should be alright for a pattern plane. Just don't expect nice stall landings
Old 03-20-2002 | 09:05 AM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Cornwall, UNITED KINGDOM
Default c-g problem

Originally posted by Cdallas2
Wing loadings can be deceptive. The only time you want a low wing loading is on a floater ie: glider or trainer.

I figure at that 27 ounces per SQ. FT. should be alright for a pattern plane. Just don't expect nice stall landings
Thanks for the reply, sounds like I should have the first few flights off the grass strip!

Cheers,

Chris
Old 05-15-2002 | 02:24 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Kamloops, BC, CANADA
Default c-g problem

I've been out of the loop for a couple of months how did that first flight go
Old 05-16-2002 | 02:54 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Cornwall, UNITED KINGDOM
Default c-g problem

It went ok, I let one my preferred test pilots do the first run, the take off run was a bit longer than I'd expected, and once I got hold of the controls found it real nice and precise.

The only thing that caught me out was a slight snap to the slow/sharp turns, but apparantly this is to be expected for this type of model - pattern ship and high wing loading - and alas, my landing was a bit slow and it dropped the last foot and damaged the cowl, glad I was flying from the grass strip! Other than that, it handled really nice, and I expect to have a lot of fun with it. It wasn't blisteringly fast, but I expect that it'll get better as the engine gets more run in and I spend a bit more time tuning the pipe.

Since then I have not flown it, mainly been busy with other models, I have taken it to the field many times, but not quite felt ready to fly it solo again without my buddy pilot handy.

Thanks for the interest,

Chris

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.