RCU Forums

RCU Forums (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/)
-   Kit Building (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/kit-building-121/)
-   -   SIG SE CG question (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/kit-building-121/2863553-sig-se-cg-question.html)

FlyBlueSkies 04-10-2005 08:04 PM

SIG SE CG question
 
I finishing my build of the SSE. Without any added weight, it is balancing @ 4 1/2" or 1" aft of the recommended CG.

In order to balance it correctly (@ 3 1/2" from the leading edge), I have to add a LOT of weight to the nose.

Has anyone else experienced this?

If I balance it at 4 1/2" from the leading edge, will it be a handful to handle (I would think so...)?

Any experience is appreciated!

-Jeff

fred123 04-10-2005 09:41 PM

RE: SIG SE CG question
 
I had the same problem with my SE with a OS 46AX and a Sullivan Tail Wheel.. All the guys at the field said they wouldn't fly it and mine balanced 3/4" back from the spar. Well, I took it back home, moved the motor as far forward as it would go. Added a 2 1/2 OZ spinner nut and another 2 OZ of lead in the nose. In addition, I replaced the steel tail brace wires with 50 pound fishing line. I have seen this same problem in several threads and it makes me wonder if the model needs to be revised. I too would like to hear what others say about this problem..Fred123[&:]

BadAtti2de 04-10-2005 10:47 PM

RE: SIG SE CG question
 
Just FYI, I fly mine at about 3/4 to 1/2 behind the spar with no adverse affects. But if you dont feel confident then move it. Also did you try moving the battery pack up under the fuel tank?

Hughes500E 04-11-2005 02:09 AM

RE: SIG SE CG question
 
I have been experimenting with the CG of this plane ,let me say it is not very nice to fly with the CG even a 1/4" back from recommended. Much more stable at recommended.

CHassan 04-11-2005 03:23 AM

RE: SIG SE CG question
 
I beg to differ on that!! I flew mine for hundreds of flights with 2-56 tail braces. I also moved ele and rudder servos to the tail. The only thing I did to get a little more nose weight was to move the battery up to the front of the radio compartment.
Do a search on here and you will see that this plane can be flown with a pretty far aft CG.

Connery 04-11-2005 06:53 AM

RE: SIG SE CG question
 
I have a 46LA in mine, the battery is up under the tank and I still had to add 6oz to the nose to balance it.

Hughes500E 04-11-2005 10:45 AM

RE: SIG SE CG question
 
My UCD flew great with an AFT CG as well as the 27% Extra but this SSE with an AFT CG flew worse than a wingless GeeBee LOL
Lots of these guys are flying the SSE for a second plane. The recommended CG is much more stable. Moving the CG back as I did proved to be less than comfortable, that's all.
I would say balance the SSE as per instructions for the first few flights then do as I did and start eperimenting.

Cheers

fred123 04-11-2005 02:02 PM

RE: SIG SE CG question
 
Yes, the battery pack was up against the firewall..Fred123[&:]

FlyBlueSkies 04-11-2005 06:53 PM

RE: SIG SE CG question
 
Thanks for all the comments. I'll think I'll play it safe and adjust the CG to it's recommended value (3 1/2" from the leading edge).

If it flys well, I would agree the model should be looked at. It just doesn't seem right, that the CG is so far off.

-Jeff

hillmanr2 04-11-2005 08:56 PM

RE: SIG SE CG question
 
I flew my se for the first time with the cg 3/4" back from the spar and it flew awsome just a hair touchy on landing but no big deal even during a dead stick


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:51 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.