Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Kit Building
Reload this Page >

SIG SE CG question

Community
Search
Notices
Kit Building If you're building a kit and have questions or want to discuss kit building post it here.

SIG SE CG question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-2005, 08:04 PM
  #1  
FlyBlueSkies
Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Aurora, OH
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default SIG SE CG question

I finishing my build of the SSE. Without any added weight, it is balancing @ 4 1/2" or 1" aft of the recommended CG.

In order to balance it correctly (@ 3 1/2" from the leading edge), I have to add a LOT of weight to the nose.

Has anyone else experienced this?

If I balance it at 4 1/2" from the leading edge, will it be a handful to handle (I would think so...)?

Any experience is appreciated!

-Jeff
Old 04-10-2005, 09:41 PM
  #2  
fred123
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Arkadelphia, AR
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: SIG SE CG question

I had the same problem with my SE with a OS 46AX and a Sullivan Tail Wheel.. All the guys at the field said they wouldn't fly it and mine balanced 3/4" back from the spar. Well, I took it back home, moved the motor as far forward as it would go. Added a 2 1/2 OZ spinner nut and another 2 OZ of lead in the nose. In addition, I replaced the steel tail brace wires with 50 pound fishing line. I have seen this same problem in several threads and it makes me wonder if the model needs to be revised. I too would like to hear what others say about this problem..Fred123[&:]
Old 04-10-2005, 10:47 PM
  #3  
BadAtti2de
Senior Member
 
BadAtti2de's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: SIG SE CG question

Just FYI, I fly mine at about 3/4 to 1/2 behind the spar with no adverse affects. But if you dont feel confident then move it. Also did you try moving the battery pack up under the fuel tank?
Old 04-11-2005, 02:09 AM
  #4  
Hughes500E
Senior Member
My Feedback: (16)
 
Hughes500E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Armstrong, BC, CANADA
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: SIG SE CG question

I have been experimenting with the CG of this plane ,let me say it is not very nice to fly with the CG even a 1/4" back from recommended. Much more stable at recommended.
Old 04-11-2005, 03:23 AM
  #5  
CHassan
My Feedback: (13)
 
CHassan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: MainevilleOH
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default RE: SIG SE CG question

I beg to differ on that!! I flew mine for hundreds of flights with 2-56 tail braces. I also moved ele and rudder servos to the tail. The only thing I did to get a little more nose weight was to move the battery up to the front of the radio compartment.
Do a search on here and you will see that this plane can be flown with a pretty far aft CG.
Old 04-11-2005, 06:53 AM
  #6  
Connery
Senior Member
 
Connery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tyler, TX
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: SIG SE CG question

I have a 46LA in mine, the battery is up under the tank and I still had to add 6oz to the nose to balance it.
Old 04-11-2005, 10:45 AM
  #7  
Hughes500E
Senior Member
My Feedback: (16)
 
Hughes500E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Armstrong, BC, CANADA
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: SIG SE CG question

My UCD flew great with an AFT CG as well as the 27% Extra but this SSE with an AFT CG flew worse than a wingless GeeBee LOL
Lots of these guys are flying the SSE for a second plane. The recommended CG is much more stable. Moving the CG back as I did proved to be less than comfortable, that's all.
I would say balance the SSE as per instructions for the first few flights then do as I did and start eperimenting.

Cheers
Old 04-11-2005, 02:02 PM
  #8  
fred123
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Arkadelphia, AR
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: SIG SE CG question

Yes, the battery pack was up against the firewall..Fred123[&:]
Old 04-11-2005, 06:53 PM
  #9  
FlyBlueSkies
Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Aurora, OH
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: SIG SE CG question

Thanks for all the comments. I'll think I'll play it safe and adjust the CG to it's recommended value (3 1/2" from the leading edge).

If it flys well, I would agree the model should be looked at. It just doesn't seem right, that the CG is so far off.

-Jeff
Old 04-11-2005, 08:56 PM
  #10  
hillmanr2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kelowna, BC, CANADA
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: SIG SE CG question

I flew my se for the first time with the cg 3/4" back from the spar and it flew awsome just a hair touchy on landing but no big deal even during a dead stick

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.