Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Profile and Fun Flying Planes
Hello everybody... a question: >

Hello everybody... a question:

Community
Search
Notices
Profile and Fun Flying Planes If you're a profile fan or into fun flyers than this is the forum to discuss those topics.

Hello everybody... a question:

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-08-2002 | 05:37 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From:
Default Hello everybody... a question:

I am about to built a new funfly from scratch.
My last plane was a dazzler.
I have an os 40 fx engine.

here are my 2 options:

Mustang funfly
wasp

I want slow flying, good 3d performer

what should i choose?

10x
Old 06-09-2002 | 01:56 AM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: lady lake, FL
Default Hello everybody... a question:

If you are really going to scratch it build the wasp. Its a very easy build. The wasp doesnt excel at everything, but it definitely excels at hovering which you will easily be able to do all day with a 46.
Old 06-09-2002 | 03:16 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: conway, NC
Default Hello everybody... a question:

Id say the Mustang but only because I didnt like the Wasp.
Old 06-10-2002 | 01:14 AM
  #4  
PaulSwany's Avatar
My Feedback: (45)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,811
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bartlett, TN
Default Hello everybody... a question:

The wasp is a ton of fun.... go with it... You'll have a blast!!! Super easy to build and ton's of fun to fly!!

Here's my wasp:


More Wasp Pictures
Old 06-10-2002 | 08:03 AM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From:
Default Hello everybody... a question:

10x for helping me


PaulSwany, what engine do you use on your wasp?
Old 06-10-2002 | 01:38 PM
  #6  
PaulSwany's Avatar
My Feedback: (45)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,811
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bartlett, TN
Default Hello everybody... a question:

I used a TT 46 on mine.... I think it would fly with a strong 32 or 36!!! If you build it light, it comes out to a little less that 4 lbs.

But the TT 46 is perfect... and really cheap right now!! It's only $75 new at QuantumModels.com!!
Old 06-10-2002 | 02:39 PM
  #7  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From:
Default Hello everybody... a question:

is my O.S. 40 fx would be enough?
Old 06-10-2002 | 02:57 PM
  #8  
PaulSwany's Avatar
My Feedback: (45)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,811
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bartlett, TN
Default Hello everybody... a question:

Might be...... If it's really strong.... That engine actually weighs more than the .46..... http://www.osengines.com/engines/fx.html

Give it a shot. You can always bold up a .46 later....
Old 06-10-2002 | 03:10 PM
  #9  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From:
Default Hello everybody... a question:

and with a tuned pipe?
Old 06-10-2002 | 04:16 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Caracas, VENEZUELA
Default Super Wasp

I second Super Wasp option.

I have one from 2 moths ago and love it, in fact i can hover forever, do nice climbing flat spins, tight loops, harrier and i'm actually trying elevators too. Knife edge is not as good but i still like this one. .40 FX should be enough, mine hovers at less than 1/2 throtle using Byron 15% and MA 11x5 (i know this is not the best prop) so you could be using 11x4.
Old 06-10-2002 | 04:37 PM
  #11  
PaulSwany's Avatar
My Feedback: (45)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,811
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bartlett, TN
Default Hello everybody... a question:

If you use a tuned pipe... be carefull!!! Tuned pipes are a little finicky.... You want to tune for midrange, not high end.... you also want the engine to be very reliable...... It's not pretty when your engine flames out while hovering 5 ft. off the deck... ask me how I know....

I'd go with the standard exhaust and a 10 x 5 prop and see how she goes.... Just build it really light and do the super wasp mods... You can also build up the ailerons and elevator, make the rudder out of 1/4" sq and use 1/4 balsa for the spars to kill some weight.... Don is experimenting with a built up fuse to reduce weight... My next wasp will be built this way.... He did his 1 1/2" wide so that he could mount a servo in the bottom of the fuse.... Kinda cool....
Old 06-11-2002 | 04:35 AM
  #12  
Shortman's Avatar
My Feedback: (21)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,966
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Portland, Oregon
Default Hello everybody... a question:

When considering tuned pipes you have to consider the extra weight. They arn't exactly the lightest things
Old 06-11-2002 | 11:11 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Easley, SC
Default Aeron-40?

have you considered the Aeron-40. Scratch Builder Plans are available at:
http://www.hsrcm.com

Tuned pipes do not have to weigh any more, and allot of times less than the stock muffler. I normally run the Mac Headers and and Mac long tuned pipes. This combo typically the same weight or less than the stock muffler, of course this combination does not have a baffle either. I've noticed that the tuned pipes that have baffles are much heavier. I assume it is because of not only the baffle itself, but the material to retain the baffle, and the construction requirements that you usually see to be able to remove the baffle too.
Hope that this gives you some additional insight!
Old 06-11-2002 | 10:35 PM
  #14  
3DMike's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: South, NEW ZEALAND
Default Hello everybody... a question:

nice plug!! hehe. What exactly are you wanting to do with your funfly? if its hovering and your short of money I would go with the wasp(you can download the plans), its designed by an aussie but it hovers very well.
The mustang and aeron style planes are all decendends of the Morris Hobbies range. After looking at the aeron I would probably reccomend that, it seems well designed and light and your existing motor would easily power it. Personally I would stay away from the pipe, they work with the smaller high reving engines but for a funfly you need the INSTANT throttle response that a standard muffler gives.
Old 06-12-2002 | 07:08 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: brooklyn, NY
Default exhaust

you can make a tuned mouuse exhaust for about 2.00 excluding the header. when you are finished it will improve the engine's output and weigh less than most any after market tuned pipe and less than any factory exhaust.
Old 06-12-2002 | 11:35 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Easley, SC
Default Tune Pipe and Throttle Response

3DMike - realize that if you tune the header (by cutting it) so that it is 1/4" to 1/2" longer than you would for max. RPM, you push the power band down more into the midrange RPMs, where you want it for a Fun-Fly. A header and tuned pipe will not effect the throttle response, in fact by pushing the power band down, you can 'get on the pipe' quicker and throttle response is better!!!

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.