control surface flutter
#1
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: powell river b.c.
I was wondering if using two of my hitec 605 servos for rudder and elevator is overkill. They are hi torque 77oz. The plane is an uproar60 with a webra 80 two stroke. I was also planning on using two standard ball bearing servos for ailerons. This is my first funfly model and i am worried about flutter with the larger control surfaces.
#2
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Oregon sometimes, Washington Sometimes
Make sure there is no slop in the linkages, and don't try to fly it too fast and you shouldn't have any problem.
--Paul
--Paul
#3
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Cary, NC
speed is your enemy. i've heard lots of horror stories regarding uproars and dazzlers ripping apart because of too much speed. make sure you prop it for thrust, not speed! if you get flutter you are flying too fast for that plane!
#4
Senior Member
My Feedback: (6)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Bedford Heights,
OH
Funflys were not designed for Speed, large surfaces and speed dont mix, and with that Webra 80 you are going to have alot of speed, so selecting the right prop will be important, and throttle management.
Don't fly straight and fast, use the throttle as needed for manuevers. Throttle back for level flight. Good luck. Daz...
Don't fly straight and fast, use the throttle as needed for manuevers. Throttle back for level flight. Good luck. Daz...
#5
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Oregon sometimes, Washington Sometimes
A friend of mine had his Dazzler shed its wing covering twice, one time the horizontal stabilizer broke. 3 or 4 times this happend to the bottom of the wing. Finally while flying at a demonstration during our high schools spring week, the top covering flew off, then the rest of the plane ripped itself apart.
It was really spectacular. Several of the guys in the AMA club we belong to were telling him over and over that someday it would do that. Some of us were practically placing bets.
--Paul
It was really spectacular. Several of the guys in the AMA club we belong to were telling him over and over that someday it would do that. Some of us were practically placing bets.
--Paul
#6
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: powell river b.c.
Thanks for all the advice guys. I was planning on using a 13/6 prop but now a 14/4 or 5 sounds better for speed control.By the way, this uproar is going on floats and hopefully clean up at some of the float fly events we have on the B.C. coast this summer.
#7
Senior Member
Having been bitten a time or two too often by flutter, I use mass balancers on the ailerons and elevators of everything I build, and have have little trouble since. Addition of mass balancers can make even competition fun-fly models virtually flutter-proof, when without balancers, they would flutter badly at anything over 30 MPH or so. I have flown such models at speeds in excess of 100 MPH, with aileron chords over 4", without flutter, thanks to mass balancers with the right balance moment.
#8
Senior Member
Re servo torque required - Multiplex has an excellent program available at: http://multiplexrc.com/calcservo.htm
The program works well, but has a glitch - It tends to overestimate servo torque required, since it seems to assume that the servo output arm moves through the same angle as the control surface. This error can easily be corrected by simply multiplying the result that the program spits out by the ratio of the control surface deflection to servo arm deflection.
The program works well, but has a glitch - It tends to overestimate servo torque required, since it seems to assume that the servo output arm moves through the same angle as the control surface. This error can easily be corrected by simply multiplying the result that the program spits out by the ratio of the control surface deflection to servo arm deflection.
#9

My Feedback: (45)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,811
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Bartlett,
TN
Originally posted by Rotaryphile
Addition of mass balancers can make even competition fun-fly models virtually flutter-proof, when without balancers, they would flutter badly at anything over 30 MPH or so.
Addition of mass balancers can make even competition fun-fly models virtually flutter-proof, when without balancers, they would flutter badly at anything over 30 MPH or so.
#10
Senior Member
Yes, Paul - it is just that. I usually incorporate them into the tip portion of the control surface, but have made many others from streamlined coffee sticks with streamlined lead weights epoxied on. The stick faces ahead of the hinge line at an angle that is just sufficient for the arm to clear the wing or stab at full deflection. This type is easy to rig up for a quick test; later you can do a more sanitary job. It is important not to overdo the weight - too little is much better than too much, since excess balancer weight can excite higher harmonics that can be very destructive.



