Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Questions and Answers
Difference between TT 40 and 42 >

Difference between TT 40 and 42

Community
Search
Notices
Questions and Answers If you have general RC questions or answers discuss it here.

Difference between TT 40 and 42

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-19-2003 | 04:24 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: UberabaMG, BRAZIL
Default Difference between TT 40 and 42

Whats the difference between the TT 40 and the 42? Which is best?
Thanks
Old 08-19-2003 | 04:51 PM
  #2  
FLYBOY's Avatar
My Feedback: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,076
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Missoula, MT
Default Difference between TT 40 and 42

2 Probably won't notice much diff. Look at the HP produced and the weight of each engine. Probably won't see much diff.
Old 08-19-2003 | 09:20 PM
  #3  
FLYBOY's Avatar
My Feedback: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,076
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Missoula, MT
Default Difference between TT 40 and 42

Ok, had some time and researched it for you.

GP-42 12.6 OZ 1.1 HP at 16,000 RPM
Pro 40 16.03 OZ 1.22 HP at 16,000 RPM
Pro 46 15.82 OZ 1.43 HP at 16,000 RPM

For my money, I wouldn't touch the 42, and with the 46 being lighter and putting out more power, I would go with it over a 40 any day of the week! Good engines though. I have one and like it. Never had a problem with it. Here are some sites for you.

http://www.acehobby.com/acehobby/pro...ies/index.html

http://www.acehobby.com/acehobby/pro...ies/index.html
Old 08-19-2003 | 09:44 PM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: UberabaMG, BRAZIL
Default Difference between TT 40 and 42

FLYBOY

Thanks a lot for your research. I am asking cause theres a guy offering me one on a trade and I was wondering if it would be as good as the 42.

Thanks again
Old 08-20-2003 | 11:06 AM
  #5  
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: MS
Default Difference between TT 40 and 42

If the .40 is a Pro40, it is a better engine than the GP42. The Pro series are ball-bearing engines. If it is the older GP40, there is very little difference between them except that the .40 may be about worn out. I don't think the GP40 has been made in about 6 years.
Old 08-20-2003 | 02:00 PM
  #6  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: UberabaMG, BRAZIL
Default Lightfoot

Thanks for your input. Im rather confident that the engine in question is the older gp40. As you said, i may be worn out but then again, thats just a guess. Ill check into that.

Thanks
Old 08-20-2003 | 02:45 PM
  #7  
Ed_Moorman's Avatar
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,059
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Shalimar, FL
Default TT .42 vs .40

The Pro .40 is a ball bearing engine and actually there is no reason to buy it. The .46 Pro is in the same case, just bored out. This is normal for most all manufacturers.

The .42GP is a plain bearing, air-bleed carb engine. It is in the same class as the OS LA series. The only thing is, the TT .42GP is a great engine. More power than anything in its class and it's biggest attribute is its weight, or lack of. It is a light engine.

Some people, especially those less experienced in the hobby, only consider power. (And, by the way, forget all the advertised horsepower ratings. For non-racing engines they are totally worthless.) What you want to consider for a high performance plane is power-to-weight. The TT .42GP, in particular with a mousse can pipe, really works well in a fun fly type plane. They sell a bundle of these little jewels.

At one time, Thunder Tiger sold a .46GP. If they did today, it would take sales away from the Pro version. TT has even made it so you can't change carbs by giving it a screw down, flat carb mount instead of the drop-it-in-the-hole and tighten the nut type carb. That little engine screams on a 10-6 or an 11-4 prop. And there are no ball bearings to rust so you don't need after run oil.
Old 08-24-2003 | 12:08 AM
  #8  
Spaceclam's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: chatsworth, CA
Default Difference between TT 40 and 42

.02 cubic inches

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.