Equivalent Gas Engine Size to Glow Engines
#3

My Feedback: (-1)
ORIGINAL: dasintex
What would be the equivalent Gas Engine Size to Glow Engines: 40-46 Glow, 60 Glow, 90 Glow and 120-150 Glow?
What would be the equivalent Gas Engine Size to Glow Engines: 40-46 Glow, 60 Glow, 90 Glow and 120-150 Glow?
#4
Senior Member
There are 16.3 cubic centimetres (cc) to the cubic inch (ci). Glow engines are typically size in fractions of a ci and gas engines in whole ccs. Therefore:
0.40 ci = 6.52 cc
0.60 ci = 9.78 cc
0.90 ci = 14.67 cc
1.20 ci = 19.56 cc
1.50 ci = 24.45 cc
1.80 ci = 29.34 cc
... etc.
0.40 ci = 6.52 cc
0.60 ci = 9.78 cc
0.90 ci = 14.67 cc
1.20 ci = 19.56 cc
1.50 ci = 24.45 cc
1.80 ci = 29.34 cc
... etc.
#5
It's not as simple as just getting the displacement the same. Glow engines make more power for their displacement, so a gasser needs to be a little bigger to be a true equivalent. But then gassers typically make their power at a lower RPM which changes the way the plane responds to the throttle and what prop it needs. The change in prop brings a change in trimming, which may or may not make the plane fly better.
#6

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Jacksonville, FL
Looking at the math 10CC equals .60 2 stroke glow.
As said above anything over 1.20 glow I'd use a gasser. Fuel is cheaper and the flight time per gallon longer. As far as power goes a 16 lb Yak 54 with a 55CC gasser.will go straight verticle until I pull the throttle back.
Good Flyin to all
As said above anything over 1.20 glow I'd use a gasser. Fuel is cheaper and the flight time per gallon longer. As far as power goes a 16 lb Yak 54 with a 55CC gasser.will go straight verticle until I pull the throttle back.
Good Flyin to all
#7

My Feedback: (-1)
ORIGINAL: jester_s1
It's not as simple as just getting the displacement the same. Glow engines make more power for their displacement, so a gasser needs to be a little bigger to be a true equivalent. But then gassers typically make their power at a lower RPM which changes the way the plane responds to the throttle and what prop it needs. The change in prop brings a change in trimming, which may or may not make the plane fly better.
It's not as simple as just getting the displacement the same. Glow engines make more power for their displacement, so a gasser needs to be a little bigger to be a true equivalent. But then gassers typically make their power at a lower RPM which changes the way the plane responds to the throttle and what prop it needs. The change in prop brings a change in trimming, which may or may not make the plane fly better.
#8
You're 100% right, Gray beard. It's not an exact science by any means. The only real foolproof way is to find someone running a setup that you're considering as ask how well it works for them.
#9
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (10)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Displaced Canadian in Central Texas TX
Hey Guys,
Appreciate the replies and I fully agree that there's more to it than simple replacing the displacements, I was just looking for a general rule of thumb, in the ballpark numbers to steer me towards the close enough size gas replacement engines.
Thanks.
Appreciate the replies and I fully agree that there's more to it than simple replacing the displacements, I was just looking for a general rule of thumb, in the ballpark numbers to steer me towards the close enough size gas replacement engines.
Thanks.



