Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Questions and Answers
Engine ventilation >

Engine ventilation

Community
Search
Notices
Questions and Answers If you have general RC questions or answers discuss it here.

Engine ventilation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-01-2013 | 04:52 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Ft Myers, FL
Default Engine ventilation

I was wondering if this looks like I have enough removed from the dummy radial for proper ventilation. Saito FA125a is the engine.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01995.JPG
Views:	131
Size:	2.98 MB
ID:	1915639  
Old 09-01-2013 | 06:10 PM
  #2  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Ft Myers, FL
Default

Oh and does anyone know of any tricks for rerouting your muffler other than the expensive ass extensions they make?
Old 09-01-2013 | 07:28 PM
  #3  
Charlie P.'s Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,117
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
From: Port Crane, NY
Default

I would say that is not enough, but if you have it routed over the cooling fins that helps.

Rule of thumb is 2X more exit opening than intake.
Old 09-01-2013 | 07:50 PM
  #4  
JohnBuckner's Avatar
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,441
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Kingman, AZ
Default

No where near enough. Common and effectice practice with radial engine cowls and dummy engine cylinders is to cut away most of the dummy that is directly in front of the real cylinder.

Even more important is to let the air out at generally twice the area than the inlet. This is usaully positioned at the firewall on the underside.

Far two many nice scale planes have been lost because the owner would not let the engine compartment breath so the engine could be cooled.

John
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Stearman cowl.JPG
Views:	127
Size:	59.3 KB
ID:	1915679  
Old 09-02-2013 | 02:11 AM
  #5  
scale only 4 me's Avatar
My Feedback: (158)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,420
Received 54 Likes on 52 Posts
From: Avon Lake, OH
Default

Originally Posted by bob8619
I was wondering if tths looks like I have enough removed from the dummy radial for proper ventilation. Saito FA125a is the engine.
Bob,
What I've done with those is trim the areas between the dummy engines, 2 bays should be enough,, that gives you more air in,, then like other say, make sure you have enough exit. Having the cowl flaps open is a easy way of achieving that too, not sure why the ARF Man.s don't design them that way.

good luck
Old 09-02-2013 | 02:12 AM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: shenzhen, CHINA
Default

that's not enough, you should make it for two times of this space
Old 09-02-2013 | 03:54 AM
  #7  
My Feedback: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,953
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: hastings, MN
Default

And don't fpr get to have a small ait dam at the leading edge of the out let to create anegative pressure, and pull the air thru the cowl

Cheers Bob T
Old 09-02-2013 | 12:49 PM
  #8  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Ft Myers, FL
Default

Is there any reason I should not install the Kwik Fill Valve inside the fuselage by the gas tank? I don't want to drill holes in my cowling and since my plane has such easy access to the "storage area" I figured I would install it in there.
Old 09-02-2013 | 06:35 PM
  #9  
Charlie P.'s Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,117
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
From: Port Crane, NY
Default

Put the fill dot/fitting anywhere you like. If it is on a klunk for draining the tank you might want to place it higher than the tank fill level if possible. Not usually a problem - but if you forget to leave it plugged it can dump fuel on the ground. This one has gas just ahead of the smoke fill and the vents down below. Works great.




This one is on a block behind the muffler. Clean, but watch your piddies.




I installed this one below the cowl (along with the kill switch and the vent) and it's kind of a pain. Has a servo kill switch inside as well. Again, clean, but at a price. I splii a bit but at least it's not on the model.

Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCN0490.jpg
Views:	67
Size:	59.3 KB
ID:	1916137   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCN0589.jpg
Views:	64
Size:	24.4 KB
ID:	1916139   Click image for larger version

Name:	HPIM1824_zpsdf0d959b-1.jpg
Views:	63
Size:	45.8 KB
ID:	1916144  

Last edited by Charlie P.; 09-02-2013 at 06:41 PM.
Old 09-03-2013 | 01:42 AM
  #10  
scale only 4 me's Avatar
My Feedback: (158)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,420
Received 54 Likes on 52 Posts
From: Avon Lake, OH
Default

Originally Posted by bob8619
Is there any reason I should not install the Kwik Fill Valve inside the fuselage by the gas tank? I don't want to drill holes in my cowling and since my plane has such easy access to the "storage area" I figured I would install it in there.

Yes,, they suck,, they work nice at first but will fail on you sooner or later,,, use the fuel dots and a "T" or a 3 line system,,, you'll be happy you did.

Also reguards to the cowl, typically it easier for maintance if you can mount them to the fuse side, it's a pita to snake the lines sometimes through the cowl openings when you're taking it on/off,, but nothing wrong with mounting it there if it's the best spot for your app.

good luck
Old 09-03-2013 | 05:28 AM
  #11  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Ft Myers, FL
Default

Yeah I meant if mounted to the front of the fuselage under the cowl, drilling a hole in the cowl to epose it. I have never had a problem with my Kwik fills. Except for when I pulled the planes out of storage after 12 years. I just put some oil on the o rings every few months and it seems to keep everything working well.
Old 09-03-2013 | 06:45 AM
  #12  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,670
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: San Diego, CA
Default

"Yes,, they suck,, they work nice at first but will fail on you sooner or later,"

Usually caused by just pushing the connector straight in and out. If you lubricate the probe and rotate it slightly as you insert it, you will eliminate that problem.

Les
Old 09-03-2013 | 09:01 AM
  #13  
scale only 4 me's Avatar
My Feedback: (158)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,420
Received 54 Likes on 52 Posts
From: Avon Lake, OH
Default

I've never had one that didn't fail after a couple years, you guys like them thats fine,,

These never need lubing and ya never have to worry about loosing the probe,, oh and they are a lot less expensive


Nice having choices
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	RH_Deluxe_fuel_dot.jpg
Views:	66
Size:	29.0 KB
ID:	1916359  
Old 09-03-2013 | 09:04 AM
  #14  
scale only 4 me's Avatar
My Feedback: (158)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,420
Received 54 Likes on 52 Posts
From: Avon Lake, OH
Default

Originally Posted by bob8619
Yeah I meant if mounted to the front of the fuselage under the cowl, drilling a hole in the cowl to epose it. I have never had a problem with my Kwik fills. Except for when I pulled the planes out of storage after 12 years. I just put some oil on the o rings every few months and it seems to keep everything working well.
Can go just about anywhere ya want I guess,, When I did use them, I liked to mount them where they'll stay cleaner, inside a cowl wouldn't be my choice

good luck

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.