Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Questions and Answers
 Mac's mufflers/differences? >

Mac's mufflers/differences?

Community
Search
Notices
Questions and Answers If you have general RC questions or answers discuss it here.

Mac's mufflers/differences?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-28-2005 | 02:44 AM
  #1  
setxws6's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Lumberton, TX
Default Mac's mufflers/differences?

What are the differences between these two below. Both are Mac exhaust. One is just a muffler and the other a tuned pipe. But the black muffler looks very similar to a tuned pipe? So what's the differences?

The tuned looks to be heavier and more un-aerodynamic.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Hf99323.jpg
Views:	110
Size:	12.0 KB
ID:	345219   Click image for larger version

Name:	Mi22247.jpg
Views:	72
Size:	6.0 KB
ID:	345220  
Old 10-28-2005 | 07:45 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,299
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Deep River, ON, CANADA
Default RE: Mac's mufflers/differences?

The black one is a muffler -- just that. It doesn't give notably better engine performance than a stock muffler, although it weighs considerably less and has slightly less frontal area.

The tuned pipe is a performance enhancing tool for particular applications. It can boost HP quite noticeably, but in a narrow RPM band. It ain't an everyday exhaust system.
Old 10-28-2005 | 08:02 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Rochester, MN
Default RE: Mac's mufflers/differences?

Here's more than you probably ever wanted to know about tuned pipes:
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articl...4/ai_n13498021
This is written for boaters, but the principles are the same for any 2 stroke motor. The pipe acts as a sort of supercharger. Tuned properly, it packs air/fuel mixture into the cylinder of the engine, increasing HP. They were used a lot on older pattern airplanes until the .60 engine restriction was lifted. Larger engines in a lower state of tuning seem to be the ticket today.

I'm not sure but that the Mac's mufflers aren't designed as a kind of 1/4 wave pipe. In the applications where I've seen them used, they do seem to boost power over a stock muffler, just not as much as a pipe.

Pipes can also serve as a kind of regulator of power output in certain applications, and can be very effective as mufflers. The long Hatori pipes of the late 80's helped quiet the noisy pattern planes down a lot by allowing lower RPM operation with bigger props.
Old 10-28-2005 | 12:20 PM
  #4  
setxws6's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Lumberton, TX
Default RE: Mac's mufflers/differences?

Okay, so the black Mac muffler is more aerodynamic and a little better power wise than a stock muffler. And the Mac tuned pipe is best for power output, but a little less aerodynamic and probably weighs more.

I plan on putting this on my TT .46 in a F-20 tigershark speed prop plane. I know that HP/RPM is important to speed, but so it weight and drag....not to mention wing loading the heavier the plane....

Anymore opinions?
Old 10-28-2005 | 12:55 PM
  #5  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,816
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
From: Upplands Vasby, SWEDEN
Default RE: Mac's mufflers/differences?

Hi!
Get at (small) magic muffler from Dave shadel at Performance specialties in Nevada instead!
You will get around 15-20% more power with one of those (same as with the long tuned pipe in your picture) but in a much smaller package (more like the black silencer in your picture which is no good... and terribly loud). Or get a MVVS mini-pipe and make an adapter to make it suit your engine and get the same power increase as with the Dave Shadel pipe (15-20%)but a lot cheaper.


Regards!
Jan K
Sweden
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Sq46215.jpg
Views:	60
Size:	8.8 KB
ID:	345344  
Old 10-28-2005 | 01:40 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,299
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Deep River, ON, CANADA
Default RE: Mac's mufflers/differences?


ORIGINAL: setxws6

I plan on putting this on my TT .46 in a F-20 tigershark speed prop plane.----

---- Anymore opinions?

Change out the stock engine bearings for some high-perf units
Old 10-28-2005 | 03:10 PM
  #7  
Ed_Moorman's Avatar
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,059
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Shalimar, FL
Default RE: Mac's mufflers/differences?

Has anyone recently tested the Mac's black muffler on a .46? I recall I did a single test several years ago on a Thunder Tiger .46 and either lost rpm or got nothing extra. I also remember I tested the .61 size on a TT .61GP and lost 500 rpm over the stock muffler. As a result of these, I ditched all my black Mac's. Maybe they have changed.

Old 10-28-2005 | 05:25 PM
  #8  
setxws6's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Lumberton, TX
Default RE: Mac's mufflers/differences?

Lost power over a stock muffler?! Wow. I don't want that...

What about the Jett mufflers?

I want a muffler or pipe that will provide power, low mass, and fairly aerodynamic. I don't care how loud it is...

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.