Poll--Which covering do you use and why?
#4
Senior Member
Solartex (also Colortex and Worldtex) as it is much stronger, you get lots more on a roll--you would be surprized how much more you can cover with a full meter versus 36 inches on most films. It also goes around compound curves much better than film does, sticks much better and holds up better under heat, cold, damp or ??.
#5
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
For fabric I use Colortex, goes around curves very easily and is very tough.
Primarily I use Ultracote, goes on easy, looks great, makes me feel like I actually know what I am doing with iron on coverings...a feeling I never got with Monokote.
Primarily I use Ultracote, goes on easy, looks great, makes me feel like I actually know what I am doing with iron on coverings...a feeling I never got with Monokote.
#6

My Feedback: (21)
i've only covered one plane and that was with monokote, its good stuff, but i hear ultracote is the way to go, it covers easier around bends and curves, though i hear monokote is tougher, they both come with a variety of colors to, which helps.
now about that solortex? what exactly is that??? i know its covering, but have any websites?
now about that solortex? what exactly is that??? i know its covering, but have any websites?
#8
Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: City, MB,
I'm in the same boat as shortman, only covered one plane and I used monokote. It seemed to work okay, I've got some Goldberg transparent lightweight stuff waiting to put on my glider.
#9
Senior Member
My Feedback: (11)
Ultracote, because it doesn't sag.
During my 13 month house remodel, all of my models sat in a steel container in my driveway, in the hot California sun... when I took them out, every Ultracote covered model was still drum-tight on the covering, whereas the Monokote covered model looked like a prune.
I'm sure there are ways to prevent Monokote covering from sagging too.. but why bother figuring out how, when you get that benefit automatically with Ultracote ?
Gordon
During my 13 month house remodel, all of my models sat in a steel container in my driveway, in the hot California sun... when I took them out, every Ultracote covered model was still drum-tight on the covering, whereas the Monokote covered model looked like a prune.
I'm sure there are ways to prevent Monokote covering from sagging too.. but why bother figuring out how, when you get that benefit automatically with Ultracote ?
Gordon
#10
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Covington,
KY
I used Monokote when I first started in the hobby 15 years ago. I then switched to Ultrakote because it was easier to use and didn't sag. Sadly they discontinued it, when it first came back on the market I bought some, it was definetly not the same quality. I helped someone build a plane a couple years ago, and he had bought Ultrakote, I was amazed that they had returned to the original quality. I have been using it exclusively since.
#11
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Albuquerque,
NM
Have been using Monokote since the 70's. Have tried various brands long ago. Will be trying some of the newer brands when I run out of the white, yellow and orange Monokote which I have accumulated over the years.
Rich
Rich
#13
Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Harahan, LA,
I have been building for 15 years. Originally I used monocote. I tried ultracote a few years ago and found it stuck better, shrunk better, and adjusted around corners much more efficiently. I also found Ultracote on top of Ultracote applied well with less effort and bubbles than monocote. Finally, with the hot summer days around New Orleans I have very little wrinkling with Ultracote and I always struggled with Monocote. That's been my personal experiences.
#15
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Knoxville, TN
This may cause a whine or two but I've switched to MicaFilm....
Lighter, stronger, dosen't get brittle with age...can be painted with laytex house paint (gasers only)
Only bad part is the smell of the glue...and some extra time to prep with brushing on the glue..
Lighter, stronger, dosen't get brittle with age...can be painted with laytex house paint (gasers only)
Only bad part is the smell of the glue...and some extra time to prep with brushing on the glue..
#16
Senior Member
My Feedback: (7)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Lubbock, TX
Have used Monocote from day one and do a pretty good job with it. Have all the bugs most people complaine about worked out. Have used Ultracote several times but just don't like how it goes on. Personal opinion here.
Also, once you have stock of mutliple colors why spend so much $$ on all new stock??
Ed
Also, once you have stock of mutliple colors why spend so much $$ on all new stock??
Ed
#18
Senior Member
My Feedback: (14)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Orange,
TX
Started out using Monokote and stayed with it many years. Early on also used solar film on a couple of planes. Wasn't too happy with it. It tended to be saggy.
A couple of years ago I got some Oz Mid weight covering. I really like this. When you get it on it comes out clear. Then you can paint it - I use rustoleum - and end up with a real tough covering. I have gotten to the poin that this is my preferred covering on a new plane.
Recently used mica film on a park flyer. Handles real well. I am not too sold on having to put a "stickum" (Balsarite) on the plane first. Guess I have gotten too lazy with the other films with the bbuilt-in adhesive.
A couple of years ago I got some Oz Mid weight covering. I really like this. When you get it on it comes out clear. Then you can paint it - I use rustoleum - and end up with a real tough covering. I have gotten to the poin that this is my preferred covering on a new plane.
Recently used mica film on a park flyer. Handles real well. I am not too sold on having to put a "stickum" (Balsarite) on the plane first. Guess I have gotten too lazy with the other films with the bbuilt-in adhesive.
#19
Senior Member
My Feedback: (14)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Orange,
TX
Started out using Monokote and stayed with it many years. Early on also used solar film on a couple of planes. Wasn't too happy with it. It tended to be saggy.
A couple of years ago I got some Oz Mid weight covering. I really like this. When you get it on it comes out clear. Then you can paint it - I use rustoleum - and end up with a real tough covering. I have gotten to the poin that this is my preferred covering on a new plane.
Recently used mica film on a park flyer. Handles real well. I am not too sold on having to put a "stickum" (Balsarite) on the plane first. Guess I have gotten too lazy with the other films with the bbuilt-in adhesive.
A couple of years ago I got some Oz Mid weight covering. I really like this. When you get it on it comes out clear. Then you can paint it - I use rustoleum - and end up with a real tough covering. I have gotten to the poin that this is my preferred covering on a new plane.
Recently used mica film on a park flyer. Handles real well. I am not too sold on having to put a "stickum" (Balsarite) on the plane first. Guess I have gotten too lazy with the other films with the bbuilt-in adhesive.
#20
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: CA
Tried Monocoat, loved the look but got tired of picking up the shredded pieces when I had a prang. Now use 21st Century, like the way it goes on for compound corners, looks scale (on a Pitts and Cub now, Stampe next) and is stronger than my planes. Saved one wing strike because I had 21st Century on the bottom, it survived, the monocoat on top didn't. Wing was repaired but not with Monocoat this time. Cheers, Tom.
#23

My Feedback: (9)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Cedarville,
CA
I use Ultracote mainly because I have better success getting the seams and edges to seal better
and it seems to be more temperature tolerant than
some of the other coverings I have used.
For fabric I have used Colortex, Sig coverall,
and am trying out Supercoverite. The Super Coverite seems fine but we will see when it is done. I have also used the painted Coverite
(I can't remember the name) but wasn't too happy with the end result.
Sam
and it seems to be more temperature tolerant than
some of the other coverings I have used.
For fabric I have used Colortex, Sig coverall,
and am trying out Supercoverite. The Super Coverite seems fine but we will see when it is done. I have also used the painted Coverite
(I can't remember the name) but wasn't too happy with the end result.
Sam
#24
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Clarinda,
IA
I have used both Monokoat and ultracoat. I like both. I like the seams you get with Monokoat better. And I think Ultracoat is easier to use. I have done more kits in Monokote. Around here Ultracoat costs more to.
JIM
JIM
#25
Monocoat/Ultracoat:
Monocoat on majority with Ultracoat trim.
If using Monocoat as trim then the acetone trick with sealing of edges.
Ultracoat finishes are 100% Ultracoat as Monocoat just hates to adhere to it.
Old timers use to use SuperCoverrite just very heavy, majority are now Koverall.
U-Controls are still silkspan and Dope and once in awhile notalgia sets in and silk is used. Otherwise Koverall (It just takes so much filler though)
Monocoat on majority with Ultracoat trim.
If using Monocoat as trim then the acetone trick with sealing of edges.
Ultracoat finishes are 100% Ultracoat as Monocoat just hates to adhere to it.
Old timers use to use SuperCoverrite just very heavy, majority are now Koverall.
U-Controls are still silkspan and Dope and once in awhile notalgia sets in and silk is used. Otherwise Koverall (It just takes so much filler though)



