ww1 planes.
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: bolton, ON, CANADA
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ww1 planes.
Please help, I'm in the process of purchasing a 1/3 scale biplane. My dilemma is I haven't made up my mind between a 1/3 scale Balsa Usa PT 17, the Sopwith Pup or the Fokker D VII. All 1/3 scale. I really don't care about cost, I'm more concerned about flying characteristics of each plane. It's my first biplane. Not my first giant scale. Which one would fly the easiest with no bad tendencies???????
#3
RE: ww1 planes.
The PT-17 or the Pup. But, since the PT-17 is 20 years past the WWI era the Pup would be the one to go with. Not that there's anything wrong with the D-VII. Unlike the scale planes these two will all fly about the same (overpowered with the modern gas engines compared to the originals and with a LOT less torque). The D-VII lands a bit faster and stalls a bit sooner than the other two I believe.
#4
Senior Member
RE: ww1 planes.
ORIGINAL: f4udcorsair
Please help, I'm in the process of purchasing a 1/3 scale biplane. My dilemma is I haven't made up my mind between a 1/3 scale Balsa Usa PT 17, the Sopwith Pup or the Fokker D VII. All 1/3 scale. I really don't care about cost, I'm more concerned about flying characteristics of each plane. It's my first biplane. Not my first giant scale. Which one would fly the easiest with no bad tendencies???????
Please help, I'm in the process of purchasing a 1/3 scale biplane. My dilemma is I haven't made up my mind between a 1/3 scale Balsa Usa PT 17, the Sopwith Pup or the Fokker D VII. All 1/3 scale. I really don't care about cost, I'm more concerned about flying characteristics of each plane. It's my first biplane. Not my first giant scale. Which one would fly the easiest with no bad tendencies???????
Probably the Fokker. Most really short nosed biplanes could be a bit "sudden" in their movements. And Sopwiths were fairly short nosed.
#6
My Feedback: (-1)
RE: ww1 planes.
The D-VII is the better flying plane of the two war birds and A much easier plane to land. The PT-17 is the best of the group but like mentioned, it's not A WW-1 war bird, it was used as A trainer in WW-2 here in the U.S. The UK and Canada used the Tiger Moth, an even better flying plane if all you want to do is relax, not A great stunter though. For WW-1 planes another one that is A good flyer is the SE-5A and well worth lookiing at.
#7
My Feedback: (1)
RE: ww1 planes.
ORIGINAL: Gray Beard
The D-VII is the better flying plane of the two war birds and A much easier plane to land.
The D-VII is the better flying plane of the two war birds and A much easier plane to land.
If you want better aerobatic performance, though, go with the Stearman. Not to say the WWI birds won't do much, they just don't do it as well.
My overall vote would be the D-VII
#8
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Simpsonville, SC
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: ww1 planes.
My friend has the 1/3 BUSA Pup and it is huge, but very docile and a great floater. I forget what size gas burner he's got in it but its a big engine. It comes in slow and easy on landings.