Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Questions and Answers
Reload this Page >

OS 320 4 cyl versus OS 1.60

Community
Search
Notices
Questions and Answers If you have general RC questions or answers discuss it here.

OS 320 4 cyl versus OS 1.60

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-07-2009, 10:42 AM
  #1  
CESSNA 421
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (17)
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: St. Charles, MO
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default OS 320 4 cyl versus OS 1.60

I have a project that weighs 17 lbs and has a 75 inch wingspasn. If I install an OS 1.60 it will have more than enough power to fly the model but I will have to add additional nose weight. If I install an OS 320 4 cyl it will have adquate power but not as much reserve as the 1.60 but I will not have to add any nose weight. Which would be the better choice?
Old 02-07-2009, 12:12 PM
  #2  
jaka
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Upplands Vasby, SWEDEN
Posts: 7,816
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default RE: OS 320 4 cyl versus OS 1.60

Hi!
What airplane is it?
Old 02-07-2009, 12:57 PM
  #3  
ChuckW
Senior Member
 
ChuckW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Clovis, CA
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: OS 320 4 cyl versus OS 1.60

The big flat-4 might be a little more trouble but it will be very, very cool.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.