Notices
Questions and Answers If you have general RC questions or answers discuss it here.

fx or la

Old 06-30-2003, 03:54 AM
  #1  
impulse
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default fx or la

What kind of engine should i get. FX or LA (ringed or unringed)
Old 06-30-2003, 04:31 AM
  #2  
GrnBrt
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
 
GrnBrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 6,988
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default fx or la

I would go with the FX but neither one has a ring. The LA's are plain bushed and the FX is ball bearing and an engine that will suit your needs down the road better then the LA.
Old 06-30-2003, 05:17 AM
  #3  
Jim C.
Senior Member
 
Jim C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: armagh, PA
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default fx or la

fx all the way!!!!! the .46 fx has almost the same power as my .65la figure that one out....
Old 06-30-2003, 09:44 AM
  #4  
CAPtain232
My Feedback: (40)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Waynetown, IN
Posts: 2,476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default fx or la

I think it depends on what you are puting it in. I have a .65 LA that is about 3.5 yrs old and it is still running flawlessly. It is in a trainer. People give the LA serious engines a bad rap, but I like them for cheap planes. If you are building an aerobatic plane, I would definitely go with the FX.
Old 06-30-2003, 09:58 AM
  #5  
Dazzler_BE
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Kessel, BELGIUM
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default fx or la

Well, I have both the .46 LA and the .46 FX, and used them both yesterday!

The LA is in my trainer, and the FX is in my EasySport

It actually depends on what you want, the LA isn't as bad as most people will say, It's the 3 season with the LA and it is still running good. It's perfect for trainers or other slow flying planes, and cheaper than the FX

If you have a more aerobatic plane however I would suggest the FX, it has definetely more power which is required for those things. The LA in my easy sport would not give it unlimited vertical, as the FX does!
Old 06-30-2003, 10:25 AM
  #6  
Jon Wold
Senior Member
 
Jon Wold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Oslo, NORWAY
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default fx or la

I've used the .40 LA in a .25 size pattern plane and it is awesome, close to unlimited. The LA's are so light they can be used in smaller planes that need a little more omph. Best of all, the LA 40 costs half of what the 32 SX does. In a 40-size plane though, I'd go for an FX if you can afford it.
Old 06-30-2003, 01:16 PM
  #7  
Jim C.
Senior Member
 
Jim C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: armagh, PA
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default fx or la

dont get me wrong.. i love my .65 la just as much as the 46fx. but i was just saying that to compare the two they are close in power output.. the biggest thing is the weight diffrence.. i also have a 46la but i think i toasted that one back in my learning days.. so i really cant say anything bad about either.!!!
Old 06-30-2003, 03:11 PM
  #8  
impulse
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default fx or la

Thx guys. Im going to put the .46 FX in my dazzler.
Old 06-30-2003, 03:29 PM
  #9  
FLYBOY
My Feedback: (11)
 
FLYBOY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 9,037
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default fx or la

You will be a lot more pleased with it.
Old 06-30-2003, 04:21 PM
  #10  
scottrc
 
scottrc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: A TREE, KS
Posts: 2,744
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default fx or la

Yup, depends on what you will use it for..... For a trainer, the LA is a good choice because it is simple, won't overpower, and seems to run forever. The FX costs more because it is designed for much higher performance and would be great for the Dazzler. Like all OS products, runs forever if taken care of.
Old 07-03-2003, 08:11 PM
  #11  
_kearney_
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Brampton, ON, CANADA
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default fx or la

fx is better...
Old 07-05-2003, 01:23 PM
  #12  
lownslo
Senior Member
 
lownslo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 996
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default It depends??

The FX is definately the strong, quality, engine.
The LA is a very reliable, but weak engine. BUT if the LA is put in a plane like a light traniner it is a great combo. I built an LT-25 which weighs only 4.5 lbs. and put my old .40 LA in it. I fly low wings with Saitos but I will always have a trainer. I built this with almost no dihedral. I had 150 flights on that old engine in a "rebuilt-several-times" Superstar!! It was sluggish to say the least. Now in this LT-25, (63" span), I have near unlimited vertical!!!! ...lownslo..

Bob
Old 07-05-2003, 02:44 PM
  #13  
Geistware
Senior Member
My Feedback: (16)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Locust Grove, GA
Posts: 12,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default fx or la

The FX is a stronger motor.
I would go with it.
You may also want to look at the Tower BB engines.
They have had a very favorable review in the past.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.