Need input on an idea
#1
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (7)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Alburn, IL
I had this idea to make a mount to attache a camera to a radio. The idea is to make it much easier for someone to both film and drive single handedly. Looking at radio designs, I felt the commonplace Traxxas TQ radio would be easiest to build a mount for, as the bar on the front makes a great mounting point.
Well, I have the first prototype done, and I would be grateful for input on it anyone can give. I'm going to test it myself for a bit, make a few revisions, and prepare to make a couple of test units for other people to try out.
Here's what it looks like:




The later units will have cleaner, more finished look to them.
Also, given the option of having the camera attaching knob fixed in the center of the platform, or having it movable to the three positions shown, what would be preferred? The reason I ask is because once attached with a retaining washer, the knob is rather difficult to remove.
Well, I have the first prototype done, and I would be grateful for input on it anyone can give. I'm going to test it myself for a bit, make a few revisions, and prepare to make a couple of test units for other people to try out.
Here's what it looks like:




The later units will have cleaner, more finished look to them.
Also, given the option of having the camera attaching knob fixed in the center of the platform, or having it movable to the three positions shown, what would be preferred? The reason I ask is because once attached with a retaining washer, the knob is rather difficult to remove.
#2

My Feedback: (8)
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: girard, PA
nice mount but....
why would you want a camera on the control and not the car?
well i understand your idea but seems like it would be hard to watch the camera and run the car at the same time..
it looks very well made.
why would you want a camera on the control and not the car?
well i understand your idea but seems like it would be hard to watch the camera and run the car at the same time..
it looks very well made.
#3
saaaaay, not a bad idea. a cam with a flip viewer would work better though.
mounting a cam to a rc usually looks like a drugged up rat running around right before it passes out. it also gives you little perception of how fast its going.
mounting a cam to a rc usually looks like a drugged up rat running around right before it passes out. it also gives you little perception of how fast its going.
#5
ORIGINAL: SyCo_VeNoM
Another user had a similar design, but his was no where near as refined.Looks like a nice well thought out mount though.
Another user had a similar design, but his was no where near as refined.Looks like a nice well thought out mount though.
#6
ORIGINAL: The_Shark
duck-tape?
ORIGINAL: SyCo_VeNoM
Another user had a similar design, but his was no where near as refined.Looks like a nice well thought out mount though.
Another user had a similar design, but his was no where near as refined.Looks like a nice well thought out mount though.
He had his hooked to the bottom of the TQ controller.
#11
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (7)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Alburn, IL
ORIGINAL: proanti1
Not too smart posting something like this without at least applying for a patent. Its a really good idea, but would be a shame for HK or something to come across this thread and start producing them.
Not too smart posting something like this without at least applying for a patent. Its a really good idea, but would be a shame for HK or something to come across this thread and start producing them.
First, if some Chinese company did find this thread and wanted to start cranking them out for their own profit, a US patent is going to mean absolutely nothing to them. Second, let's say a US company wanted to do the same thing and start making these for their sole profit. A patent only grants you a limited amount of protection on your design. A big company with a few lawyers could easily find their way around the patent laws to make a design just different enough so it's not considered infringement on my design. Third, I'm just a guy making these in my basement workshop, trying to start a small business on the side. I simply cannot afford the time and money it would require to get a patent. Also, I think it would prove to be un-patentable in the first place, as it's far too simple of a design.
I do appreciate your concern, though, and am also glad you like the idea. Thank you!
#14
its like a lamp clamp. even if you did patent and sell it, my cheap ass would still ghetto rig one out of duct tape and a lamp clamp.
again, very nice design

again, very nice design
#15

My Feedback: (8)
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: girard, PA
patents are not that cheap.
plus unless your going to mass produce them for sell the rights its useless and also like he said a chiness so. can and will just take the idea, pay the works 13 cents an hour and kill any comp in the usa
plus unless your going to mass produce them for sell the rights its useless and also like he said a chiness so. can and will just take the idea, pay the works 13 cents an hour and kill any comp in the usa
#16
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (7)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Alburn, IL
ORIGINAL: Devils-Reject
patents are not that cheap.
plus unless your going to mass produce them for sell the rights its useless and also like he said a chiness so. can and will just take the idea, pay the works 13 cents an hour and kill any comp in the usa
patents are not that cheap.
plus unless your going to mass produce them for sell the rights its useless and also like he said a chiness so. can and will just take the idea, pay the works 13 cents an hour and kill any comp in the usa
I thought about doing what's called a "poor man's patent", where you mail yourself a few pictures and drawing of your idea. The date stamp the post office puts on that sealed envelope then proves you had that idea at that time. That's all it does though. No protection against copiers, just proof you had the idea first. Since that's pretty much useless too, there's no point in even wasting a stamp on a vain effort to protect my idea.




