State of R/C in 2015
 

I should of titled this changes in R/C over the years. 1. Change - rock crawlers. 2. Most newer modelers don't have the patience to tune nitro engines - it's an art and it's fun. 3. The driving force in the market for awhile now is for cheaper and easier to use R/Cs. 4. More electrics due to li-ion, advancements in batteries due to automotive, and ease of use. 5. The Japanese still own R/C by miles (not a change). But has the state of R/C, when compared to the 1990s gone downhill? Maybe it's just where I live, but I've seen a lot of shops where I live close throughout the years (despite towerhobbies being a competitor back then). Back in the mid 90's the hobby was growing strong with products like the USA-1 and the turbo burns, etc. It changed and made progress and more people were involved. Now, I don't know if the hobby has gone downhill, or people are less interested, or a bad economy, or less time for hobbies? Even Tower Hobbies pulled Kyosho products for awhile (I'm assuming due to cost related reasons). I have two auctions on ebay that I'm selling, because all the places like freedom hill, etc., closed up. I was thinking about opening up a track a long time ago, but there was not enough interest where I live. But yet there's enough interest for kiddie go-karts, and putt-putt golf (yawn)! Is this hobby still going strong where you live? And BTW, R/C car action was asking for suggestions to make improvements to their magazine, and I submitted a suggestion to include the MPH i.e. how fast each kit can go at their top speed, and the very next issue they started doing it, lol. That was about over a decade or so ago, lol. Anything to help the hobby. I'm at least glad the suggestion worked for the hobbys sake. :-) But about the questions...? Any comments? If you're old like me, list some changes you've seen throughout the years, good or bad, whether it be airplanes, heli, trucks, buggies, etc.

2. Agree people act like tuning a nitro is like performing a quadruple bypass surgery. While its not hard I will say its not for everyone.

3. Well cheaper is better(to an extent) ;)

4. Well yes... but Nitro really hasn't had any advancements for awhile. The biggest advancement was the Savage Octane where it uses gas in a nitro sized motor, but even that they don't seem to be trying to scale it down, or make conversions for other RC's. You can also blame the price of nitro, and the difficulty to get it in some places.

5. Yes a lot of Hobby shops have closed as they can't compete with places like tower, and other big hobby sites in pricing. Also as there are now so many models out they can't stock all the parts so they have to order them usually from tower. For instance the LHS that shut down a year or so ago by me was the biggest one in like 25 miles. Their stock was abysmal for parts they didn't even stock parts for most things they sold so they had to order the parts. Why would I pay $0.50-$30 more(plus tax) for them to get me something, and have to blow 2 gallons of gas(round trip) to pick up a part(after I blow 2 gallons to go there to be told they don't got it) where it could be ordered online, and shipped straight to the house usually faster then the shop could get it.

Then there is the lack of tracks, and places to drive for some. Like in my case the city I live in pretty much closed down the only park that is relatively safe that is close by to build another school(they have at LEAST 5 within 3 blocks...), and as the closest tracks are around 2 hour drives away, and open when I'm at work I kinda fell out of the hobby, and don't buy anything new. I actually have 2 RC's I've never got to full speed as there is no where I can find that has enough room to run them lol


Kyosho wasn't pulled due to cost
I think it was due to them wanting to distribute the RC's themselves cutting out the middleman. I could be wrong on this I remember reading something a few years back when they did it.

As for speed now they just have to put fast, stupid fast, or ludicrously fast as people have got RC's going over 100Mph. I think the only things that don't easily go over 40 are the cheap brushed models(which can usually be made to VERY easily), crawlers, and scalers.

RIght. RTR kits back then would of been considered virtually pointless. I think it was implemented to get more people interested in the hobby, then it morphed into the instant internet gratification phenomenon and stuck. And I feel bad for these new millennial kids, they are getting paid a lot less than what I made doing the same job. They don't seem to know or care about that either. And they're getting hit hard with super inflated college tuition prices, four times what I paid. That might have something to do with it. I love electric gizmos too; like the ipad, etc., but Its gone a little nuts, with tweets, facebook, myspace, foursquare, etc., kind of narcissistic stuff. One more change I can add to this thread regarding R/C over the years is the use of two and three speed transmissions. Serpent had two speeds in the nineties, then many years later they found their way into new models, for top speed advertising purposes probably, i.e. Traxxas, lol. I love Traxxas. If there can be 1,000 putt putt golf courses for every square mile, why can't there be at least one outdoor R/C track that lasts more than a year?

as memory serves (from many thousands of hours googling) it was traxxas that released the first RTR.

locally there are 2 functioning tracks, an indoor carpet and an outdoor offroad. both have seasonal races (dirt in the summer, carpet in the winter). there are also 3 hobby shops (last i checked). the carpet track is in the back of one, then there is another that used to be good but something happened and they turned to crap, only carrying traxxas and venom (back when NIMH still ruled). the other is relatively new, a hobby town.

Whats wrong with carrying Venom and Traxxas, eh? *gets paddle*

Well about the nitro thing, It isn't for everyone. I am a mechanic in my day job and after working on countless turds that don't run all day everyday the last thing i want to do is go home and play with another engine that is finicky at the best of times. After a long day of work i just want to "plug and play". So electric is by far the better option for me personally. I get my gear head fix at work and then some.(Sometimes with a lot of cursing along the way).

As for the RTR debate, I am fully on board with you guys. Every R/C I have owned has been an RTR not because i wanted an RTR but because the model i wanted was not available as a kit. It frustrates me greatly. They might as well be kits, because RTR really means ready to run twice, before screws start falling out and falling apart. You usually have to take it apart and loc-tite everything anyway. For my next rig that I plan to purchase soon I am actively seeking a kit on purpose for these very reasons but its hard because EVERYTHING is RTR now. :(

edit- My other beef with nitro is the smell, the mess, and grime that goes with them. If you have a garage to keep them in that's fine but I would bet over 50% of the people in this hobby live in apartments or town houses or something along that lines and they have to store their RC in their home. Not only is that messy but nitro is dangerous and cancerous and should not be stored in your home. I don't have a garage myself anymore. I am saving to buy the company i work for and downsized to an apartment and am currently using my kitchen table as my work bench for my RC's lol. When i bought my new 2013 f150 my friend spilled gasoline in the back seat a few days after i got it for his baja and I didn't much care for that smell in my truck for a month let me tell you. So there is lots of reasons why nitro is not for everyone whether it be the room, the noise, the mess, the added cost. Electric is just simpler and cleaner.

I disliked electric for lots of reasons, like when the battery starts to lose power, the rc slowly gradually keeps running, making you wonder if the battery is now at 90%, 50%, until you run it, and it slows. Nitro is either on or off (because of lack of fuel). Then you have to condition the batteries, and you have a bunch of batteries to charge. Then you have to give the motor and sometimes speed control time to cool down between runs. This is not really the case with nitro, and not the case with gas. Turning on an electric is like turning on a light switch, boring (like the r/c's they sell at toys r us), and then it sounds like a wheelchair on steroids. Electric smells too, certain steps when you are building the kit smell, and when the motor is hot. Some people like the smell of nitro, but it's not like you huff it. Some people like the smell of diesel. I actually knew a guy that wished they had gasoline flavored chewing gum because he liked the smell when he was filling up his car with gas; so to each his own I guess. But then if your interest grows into planes, there's nothing cooler than a 7cyl radial engine. Or a 1/3 biplane kit. The only kit which needs electric is rock crawlers partly because of electrics instantaneous torque. But these are small models of the real thing, so I guess you could ask yourself would you rather have an electric vehicle (car) knowing all these drawbacks, or gas?

when NIMH was still popular, lots.

And nicad

But, who needs to "condition" batteries nowadays? Yes, you probably do get longer run times with nitro, but 7200mah 2S Lipos are becoming fairly common. And even on a 4wd SCT with a big 550 Novak brushless, that'll get you 30mins. I've even seen 10,000mah packs. Tho they're more the size of a 3S. Nah, I'm a firm electric guy, but I can understand the Nitro thing too. Just not for me.

Indeed, not for most people's NEIGHBORS either. Our local track got shut down for years because of noise from Nitro cars. Only when the local RC community got together, and talked to the Board of Sups over a period of years and made the agreement to be ELECTRIC ONLY, and only be open Thurs - Sun, were they allowed to re-open just last year. They also implemented a "No-Noise PA system" for race days using a small local FM transmitter. Everyone has a portable FM radio on them to get Race Announcements, so there is no noise from using a regular broadcast PA. Been successful so far. Zero complaints from the neighborhood around the track.

(BTW, I'm an "old guy" too. 50-ish. Only been in the hobby for 4 years or so, tho.)

You have lots of amazing indoor dirt tracks in California where noise wouldn't bother the neighbors, because there aren't any. That was my point, that is nonexistent in most places and dwindling. I've been in and out for twenty years, and I'm almost that much younger than 50. The SPL of these nitros is not ear damaging, it's the pitch that non r/c's don't like due to the high rpms of the motors 33,000rpm. Seriously, you can wear earplugs like they do at nascar, but in ear ones, if the noise is the ONLY reason you don't burn carbon.

You are right there is a down hill trend in our hobby. From where I sit, two reasons seem to be, 1) Cost of getting into the hobby, it is so expensive the younger folks can't do it, the parents are strapped with this wonderful economy they can't spend the money, 2) attitude of the older folks at the flying field, some will help if you have a model that they like and approve of other than that you could sit in a corner and wait. Over all it is cost, cost of the model airplane, car, boat what ever, they are almost all pre-made now, crash and fixing it is a long shot, so buy another one is on deck. Clubs used to get involved with groups of kids and build small inexpensive models, get the interest flowing, now they do not have the time for youngsters. AMA has totally priced themselves out of the picture for most of us, flying fields are such that unless you belong to AMA, don't even think about flying there, and some you must join their club also to fly at their field. MONEY.......MONEY and more money, wonder why the hobby is going away.

It's not electric vs nitro, I was questioning a perceived lack of interest over the recent five to ten or so years, maybe due to constraints placed on the younger ones, and they may be more interested in other things. I typed this before I read your post skipper, well said. You answered what I was trying to understand better, but couldn't put my finger on it.

There are a good deal of tracks in California, but most are in SoCal. There is another up north in Chico. Supposedly there's one in Sacramento somewhere, and our local one in Rescue. I'm lucky to have one nearby. But I'm also lucky enough to have ten acres to have my own track on, too. 😀

The other reason I don't do Nitro is not the noise I'M exposed to, it's my neighbors. One of whom I'm in a fight with over his back yard dirt bike track being a nuisance and a hazard in our rural community.

I must move to California, the r/c capital of the united states. We are the motor city, kind of ironic.

last i knew, you guys in Detroit have a model semi club. there's also a large crawler community there. no idea about the racing situation though. only been on that side of the mitten once on a field trip to greenfield village in 5th grade.

if you do move, take some of this rain with you. they could use it and i'm tired of my driveway flooding.

I knew a fellow Michiganian would chime in with that lol...Remember the winter of 2013, I'd rather be in the southwest, it was ten below zero, and that was the ambient temperature. Both coasts have their strengths and weaknesses. Fire is actually part the ecosystem in the southwest. Certain vegetation actually rely on fire in order to reproduce. But the media sometimes reports it like its a sign from above or something. But this is a thread about R/C and much of California kills us in that area, so credit is deserved. In Detroit, there's a place that has been successful here for many years, an indoor carpet track, but that is unusual. Our tracks have closed down, shops closed awhile ago even with online competition...they used to compete with tower hobbies actually. And I don't see any interest as it was before...so what changed? Skipper pretty much nailed it from what I've seen.

yeah, i remember that awful storm. knocked our power out for 3 days. i live 25 miles east of lake Michigan just off 131. any storm coming off of the lake hits me HARD. i also remember 2012. 80 in march was one thing, but 115 in august? no thank you.

Was it really 80F in March in 2012 in MI? I'd rather have 100F dry heat and a little less water for my garden than 10 below and frostbite in minutes, snow, chronic bad roads and ice. If other places can have one awesome indoor track, we should be able to have at least one that's comparable. The economy in Michigan isn't that great overall in the east, and it's worse in the western part of the state for a long time. Michigan needs to attract young educated independent thinkers. The car obsession is not like it was. It must of been cool in the 60s, but that time is over and is not coming back. I'm still looking forward to my next r/c regardless if I'm the only guy there lol.

yep, in some cases doubled the record high. most places the low for the day bested the previous high by 10 or more degrees for a week straight. we have gotten hit hard by the economy, and so have all hobby and recreation businesses..lost our best mini golf course and a large gokart/paintball facility. the checker plant closing down was the biggest hit. my grandpa retired about 4 months before the first round of layoffs. now the biggest factory employer is stryker (they make them fancy hospital beds among other things). used to have all kinds of manufacturing jobs. Gibson was founded here. they moved and closed the factory 9 years before i was born. now, there isnt much middle-middle class work. there's upper and lower middle class at Pfizer and stryker. there's minimum wage pretty much everywhere else. there's lots of money on the coast, but that's out of state and/or retirees mostly. what money there is for hobbies is mostly spent on electronics. i'm among last of a dying breed. people who would rather fabricate something instead of buy.

dont you guys get tired of whinning.its not chicken little and the sky isnt falling in.so lots modellers dont fly nitro so what.I did it for 30 years and still have a couple four strokes.yes i enjoy electrics too.oh and i have a dle 30 gasser. technology is cheaper these days and back a number of years nitro was all you could get. sorry but rc is alive and well.

Oh PLEASE, YES! Bring rain with you!! We're dryin' up out here! One community already has had their wells run dry, NO tap water! Those folks are gonna need that new machine that produces water literally out of thin air. Never mind we ought to be building solar desalinization plants as fast as possible. But our governments (State AND Federal) are completely corrupted by the Corporatocracy and don't give a ****e about the well-being of its citizens or the environment anymore. We're on our own. And if you don't see that, you're blind.

You guys should do what the Saudis do, they just built a nuclear powered desalination facility, and they seem to be doing fine with it. Problem solved. Solar power doesn't provide enough power for these kind of things. And California would add jobs building the plant as well. The people just need to bring these things up and maybe things will get moving, despite any corruption. Or do what corporations do and get dc lobbyists lol. Californians used to pride themselves setting the lead for everyone else to 'follow' (just friendly ribbing). Cloud, you're in florida, so maybe where you live it's active. It's not the same everywhere.

Cumquat, don't you guys have the Kellogg factory there also? Kalamazoo is a good college, but if you are in the process...consider my advice and get a 2 year degree. Credit hours are ridiculously expensive, and lots of 4 year degrees are worth a lot less than the 2 year ones (not referring personally).

Kellogg is in battle creek, about 20 miles east of me. we have 3 colleges, WMU, kalamazoo valley community college and kalamazoo college. i have though many times about going to KVCC then transferring to western for mechanical and electrical engineering. however some past life choices make that tricky to accomplish. not impossible, just tricky. as far as bachelor's degrees go, those are the 2 to have. having both can easily get me a 6 figure job as too few people have both and many jobs in one field benefit from the other.

If you can afford to be out of the workplace long enough get a bsme and an bsee go for it. I've never heard of that. Lots of people I know would get an eet degree for example, and their company would eventually sponser their bachelors, and somehow the eet bridges to a bsee. the bsme's I know seem okay with their choice, some get caught up in company politics. I know one bsme that quit their job working for nasa at of all places at 30 years old, and doesn't work any longer. Him/her is into astrology now and is going to write a book ?? Not to discourage you, just saying what I know.

Well nuclear anything in the US is a big nono as people are terrified of the word nuclear as it means something bad as portrayed on the news.. err propaganda shows lightly based on reality which the masses of sheeple watch. Its like why electric costs alot here where the US could easily build clean, and safe nuclear power plants, but instead prefer to burn coal which causes lung cancer, and damages the environment when extracting(and is a hazard to extract) cause they base the dangers of nuke plants on the power plants like Chernobyl or Three Mile Island(and massively inflate it in 3 miles case).


cumquat I'd go mechanical engineering personally if you have to choose one

rc55 BSEET's bridge to BSEE last I looked it was 6-7 courses(looked 12 years ago) as the majority of the base classes are the same.
I'll sound very jaded as I graduated during a terrible time with a EET, but in all honesty depending where you live trades might be the best way to go. Wish I didn't waste the pile of cash I did on a degree as all it has done for me was give me something to hang on the wall, and a mountain of crushing debt I basically work to pay off. I kept in contact with 20 or so people for a few years after I graduated, and 1 had a job in electronics(he had the job prior to enrolling even so that don't count IMO ;)). I still remember our deans encouraging words on the day of graduation "I was praying the market would get better, but you guys look like your screwed. I just hope it works out for you guys as you were all great students.". 5 years ago I ran into one guy who was working as a waiter. Another was working as a call center guy for redbox(who last I talked to last year was unemployed for 2 years), another was a teller for a bank... pile of people I saw at a wedding 7 years ago were unemployed, or under employed doing anything to scrape by.
Not sure if its just the job market by me though.
On the other hand guy I know who dropped out after 1 semester, and went and got some networking certs before racking up the huge debts is making 6 figs with no education.

If you (had) lived in Fukushima, you'd be terrified of anything nuclear too. Remember Chernobyl? California doesn't want any of that, and rightly so.
And there is a company from Texas who make portable, scalable, solar powered desalinization systems. Not big giant 10,000KW plants, but de-centralized systems that could be set up in many places near the coast, supplying water to many communities. There is even another company who makes a machine that can make water out of thin air! THAT is the technology we need and want.

mechanical would be my primary course set. i just like the idea of making my own electronic components. i have a mind for basic circuitry, but quite complex mechanical contraptions. then again, i've always done better with a torch than a pencil. great, now you guys have me wanting to look into college again... or a blue star on a particular radio controlled rock navigating website...


on the topic of nuclear, we have had 4 in the lower peninsula of Michigan. one near the northern tip which was decommissioned in 1997, 2 on the southern Lake Michigan coast and one near detroit. the one near detroit had a partial meltdown back in the '66, then started again in '70 only to be closed permanently in '72. a brand new reactor began producing power in '88 and has been since.

Oh yes. Nuclear power. We have a nuclear power plant near us (called Browns Ferry) and they have failed multiple safety checks many times, yet they are still here. During the April 27th storms down here a few years ago, they had to send in parts from Japan to make it run safely again, so we were without power for nearly 1 1/2 weeks. Totally sucked.

Well as for how many people died due to that reactor meltdown (0*) vs the 191 that died mining coal from 07 to 13**, and the many others the 13000 people that die each year due to exposure to coal pollution** I think I'll take my chances with a fukashima reactor which performed admirably for its age(as it was slated to be decommissioned a year or so later anyways) and sustained way more damage then it was designed for.
Now imagine how safe a modern reactor built with modern technology would be.

Chernobyl from what I read was caused by gross violations of rules, and regulations. From what I read they were conducting some test, and disabled a pile of safety measures, and it went kaboom. Basically idiots did something stupid. Deaths due to cancer that they think was caused by it around the world range in the 27,000 range.where coal is blamed for a lil less then 400k deaths a year around the world(mining lung cancer, etc).



Again I'd gladly replace every single power plant with a nuclear plant as the safety issues, and health issues are VASTLY blown out of proportion due to studies(and politicians) funded, and pushed by the coal companies.

As for California not wanting any of that... seriously California is the most idiotic state in the entire country(not the citizens the people in charge) as EVERY damn thing now has stickers saying it causes cancer in california so they don't want anything. Hell I bought a bottle of oxygen for a torch, and the thing had a damn sticker on it that had Contents are known to cause cancer in the state of California plastered on it... Hell I'm shocked door makers aren't required to put a sticker on every door saying USE OF THIS ITEM, AND GOING OUTSIDE IS KNOWN TO CAUSE CANCER IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

*former Fukushima supervisor of damage control died from esophageal cancer in July 2013 which there is dispute if it was from the event, or other things.

**http://www.coal-is-dirty.com/the-coal-hard-facts interesting site with a lot of coal facts like how the US's coal burning is 30% of our CO2, and where I got the death counts due to coal

WOW, has THIS gotten off-topic!! Apologies to the OP.
Syco, you are obviously an intelligent man. An I don't want to get into a pissing match with a guy I consider a good bloke. (Tho LORD I wish you would use punctuation!) I totally agree coal mining and coal-fired power plants account for a huge loss of life. It's one of the dirtiest fuels we have. ("Clean Coal" my harry white ass!) And to be fair, the two multi- reactor sites in Japan had indeed been operating just fine....until the earthquake & tsunami. The tsunami doing the real damage. But why the hell did they build it next to the bleeding ocean??? See, it's THAT kind of human error in judgment we always seem to look back on and go, "OH, maybe we shouldn't have done that." And then there's the spent fuel that has to be buried somewhere for eons. And what if that stuff leaks into the ground water, or is exposed by another earthquake?

But I am afraid you are right, in this Corporatocracy, the few who have all the money/power (Oil, Coal) will not let any new technology ruin their Kingdoms of Power by letting solar, wind, and wave technologies get into the game. And due to the sheer size of this country, interior states would probably still need Power Station Generation. At least until Fusion becomes feasible.

Yeah, we're all used to "those crazy Californians" jokes. That Prop 65 Cancer Labeling thing is a prime example. The Initiative Process that allows measures to be put on the Ballot by collecting enough signatures was a good idea, but it's kinda gotten outta hand IMO. They're usually poorly written, get challenged in Court, or otherwise cause unnecessary wastes of time, so I usually vote NO on any Initiatives anymore. But if you came to California and saw the immense beauty and the diversity of its nature and wildlife, its landscapes and coastlines and fertile valleys (that supply a great deal of the fresh veggies the rest of the county consumes)(picked by Mexican migrant farmworkers. Screw you Mr Trump) you'd understand why as a native Californian, I get pretty upset when I see the environment getting polluted. (My head just about explodes when they talk about Fracking in California, the most earthquake-prone state in the lower 48, and in a severe drought!!) Yeah, I get pretty upset. I have to take freaking medication to keep my head exploding from watching the 5 o'clock news!

But, we are WAY WAY off topic my friend. I think we've both made our points. Let's call it a draw. Peace?
I come here to forget all the crap going on elsewhere. ;)

Well I won't lie I wish I had any kind of scenery outside concrete, and asphalt ;)
Hell even the night sky due to the insane levels of light pollution where I am all you can make out is 5-6 starts total(on good days otherwise its pitch black), and according to a light pollution chart the closest place I could get a decent view is near the Iowa border...

Bah not like much is going on anyways but going offtopic ;)

Found this RC cars collection.--> http://goo.gl/iZrYlG
What is your favorite car?

wind and solar are picking up here. there are a few turbines around town and it's not entirely uncommon to see a roof of solar panels. we have just about the perfect weather for it too. if it aint sunny, chances are it's windy. often it'll be both. free electric to charge our batteries. there, i kept on topic. we have quite the diverse landscape too. steep hills, dunes. wetlands, farmland and forestland galore. no matter what aspect of rc you enjoy, there is public space to do so. gotta be careful though, coyotes are everywhere and wolves have been spotted in the LP. not to mention black bears and mosquitoes...

I remember in the mid 60's in so cal when rc was in its infancy. People spent hundreds of dollars on an emerging technology few could understand. I was flying a string controlled PT-17 when I saw my first RC airplane. The PT-17 I was flying was equipped with a .049 engine. It was held together with rubber bands so it would survive a crash without damage. My how time has changed... Try to imagine what it will be like in another 10 years or so.

looking back a decade tells me...nothing good. back in '05 brushless and lipo were emerging techs.while they are mainstream now, it took 7 year for them to gain real momentum and fully replace brushed and nickel cells. the future outlook is grim to me because there is no new tech that really stands a chance of flourishing. smaller gas engines will need to be adopted in the power tool industry before they truly become viable widely. i just dont think that will happen because brushless and lithium have taken over that field in most circumstances. the only gas powered tools i know of are engine drills such as this http://www.homedepot.com/p/ECHO-21-2...-210/100666171 and while i can see a few uses for such a machine, i dont see the usefulness of a .12ci dremel outside of cool factor.

side note about that gas drill, if you read the product overview it says it can be used for pest control. the mental images that gives me are both humorous and disturbing.

PEST CONTROL??! Holy CRAP! What kind of pests are we talkin' about here? Giant Zombie Rats? LOL!!

Looking grim, cumquat? No new stuff? What about small-displacement GAS engines for RC? Got 'em! Don't need expensive nitro fuel. How about AVC? That's a pretty cool technology. (Traxxas is even coming out with their version of it.) Speaking of Traxxas, they've got their Funny Car dragsters, with starting lights and speed/timing traps. You gotta admit that's cool. I hear RC tractor pulling is getting pretty popular. No, I think RC is doing just fine. While some petrol-heads might see the proliferation of electric vehicles as something apocalyptic, I think it's just that more people are embracing electric-power RC precisely because the current technologies (brushless and lipo) have made incredible power (once the domain of nitro only) incredibly easy, AND they don't annoy the neighbors.

i covered small gas engines in my previous post. AVC is not a good thing, it's a very bad thing in my book. rather than learning how to control power, the radio does it for you. driver skill will be a thing of the past if it becomes widespread. they released the funny car like 4 years ago. rj speed had been making them for a few years before that. still dont have rc drag racing locally and we have a drag strip that hosts IHRA events as well as midnight races because kids were street racing. i imagine tractor pulling has gotten a bit more mainstream since rc4wd now makes pulling tires in 3 different sizes but that's still about as niche as rc gets. i'd be willing to bet that rc trucking and construction equipment are more popular.