Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Combat
 PROP SELECTION >

PROP SELECTION

Community
Search
Notices
RC Combat Discuss rc combat planes, techniques and strategies here.

PROP SELECTION

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-08-2006 | 03:36 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Houston, TX
Default PROP SELECTION

I am about to set up a OS25FX.
Curious whats being used in the APC line for best speed and reasonable pull.
Thanks
Old 07-08-2006 | 05:08 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Laurel, MD,
Default RE: PROP SELECTION

For flying combat, a 9x4 is about right. I actually prefer the Master Airscrew GF/2 prop, since it allows the engine to rev a bit more and not bog down in a tight turn. The APC 9x4 is ok, and will run well, but in a really tight turn, the engine will load up a bit, so you can't hold quite as tight of a turn.

(btw, the GF/2 is the old style master airscrew. The new props, the GF/3 load the engine more, somewhat like the APC, so I don't like them. You can still get GF/2s if you order direct from MAS.
Old 07-08-2006 | 05:12 PM
  #3  
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: N. Syracuse, NY
Default RE: PROP SELECTION

Good tip on the new props, thanks Kirk. I was wondering if there was any difference in the new series. Those originals sure do work well, but I haven't tried the new ones yet for combat.

Did you notice any difference in durability between the GF/2 and GF/3?
Old 07-08-2006 | 05:20 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Laurel, MD,
Default RE: PROP SELECTION

Durability? No, I didn't, but I didn't fly the new ones much. I bought a package, but wound up selling most of them to another guy here, since I don't like them much.

The folks at MAS know combat guys buy a ton of props, so they are keeping the GF/2 in production in some sizes. I just got a dozen 10x4's for limited B, and 2 dozen 9x4s for example. But I doubt you'll see many hobby stores trying to carry both types.
Old 07-08-2006 | 10:29 PM
  #5  
rrh
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Manitou Springs, CO
Default RE: PROP SELECTION

I like the APC Combat 9x3. It seems to me that the MAS 9x4 flexes flat to maybe a 9x2, makes noise and doesn't go anywhere..IMO.

r
Old 07-10-2006 | 08:44 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Laurel, MD,
Default RE: PROP SELECTION

I also use the APC 9x3 combat, but only my Webras, and only when they are getting up on the pipe and putting out enough power to keep the rpm up in the turns. On my OS's I use the MAS isntead. I find that the MAS 9x4 just pulls through the turns better, even if it does flex a little. Now, with the Webras, when they are turning up, the MAS is just not designed to handle that RPM, so I use the APC. However, at least one of my Webra's is getting tired, and doesn't always rev up (depends on the weather mostly). During the morning test flights, I try it on the APC 9x3combat. If it doesn't perform, I put on the MAS 9x4, which does allow the engine to spin up in to it's power band.

I should also note that prop selection does depend at least some on the airframe, envrionment, fuel, and flying style. What works best for one guy might not be best for another.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.