Community
Search
Notices
RC Electric Off-Road Trucks, Buggies, Truggies and more Discuss electric RC off-road, buggies & trucks here. Also discuss brushless motors, speed controllers aka ESC's, brushed motors, etc

NiCd vs. NiMH for my application

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-16-2007, 01:38 PM
  #1  
phiberoptik
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default NiCd vs. NiMH for my application

Probably an age old question within the electric RC world. NiCd vs. NiMH

I am a novice RC fan with little indepth knowledge of the RC world. I simply want to parking lot bash with my 1/10th and maybe move on to Off Road RC but staying within Electric for the simplicity of it. I like high speed and with having multiple packs, Im not too concerned about run time as I can switch them out. I never plan to officially race any of my RCs.

I currently have several NiCD packs and a Pirahna Quick Charger for them and thats great for the parking lot.

Would I benefit substantially by moving on to NiMH and buying a charger for them? What are the benefits and would it be worth the money for my situation?
Old 01-16-2007, 01:49 PM
  #2  
running_gag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Minot AFB, ND
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: NiCd vs. NiMH for my application

It is not an age old question anymore. Nimh are easier to maintain, give more punch per pack, longer run times, and just have a longer usefull life. a lot of us are deciding if we can afford to go to lipo.
Old 01-16-2007, 02:04 PM
  #3  
guver
Senior Member
My Feedback: (325)
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: LaGrange, OH
Posts: 14,857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: NiCd vs. NiMH for my application

I think if you have good quality 2400's and compared to generic 3000 nimh it would be a mistake, but if you happen to have cheap 1500's and are comparing to 3300-4300's thn yes it would be worth it.
Old 01-16-2007, 03:23 PM
  #4  
phiberoptik
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: NiCd vs. NiMH for my application

yeah... lipo is for another day hahaha. I dont think I want to get into all that quite yet. Let me get bored with brushed motors and NiCD/NiMH before I mess with brushless systems and lipo.

thanks guys
Old 01-16-2007, 03:42 PM
  #5  
raz54
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: eureka, CA
Posts: 2,798
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: NiCd vs. NiMH for my application

NiMh are far better than nicads. They don't develop a memory like nicads so you don't have to discharge them all the time before charging. If you get a good NiMh you'll will see the difference in how fast you car goes over the nicad.
Old 01-17-2007, 11:31 AM
  #6  
phiberoptik
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: NiCd vs. NiMH for my application

Ok, well i have this charger...

http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...&I=LXSG85&P=ML

will this work with NiMH battery packs? Nothing listed mentions them.

Thank you.
Old 01-17-2007, 12:02 PM
  #7  
running_gag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Minot AFB, ND
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: NiCd vs. NiMH for my application

It'll work, but timed chargers are evil. EVIIIIIIIIILLLLLLLLLLLLL1
Old 01-17-2007, 01:39 PM
  #8  
phiberoptik
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: NiCd vs. NiMH for my application

can you elaborate on why they are evil?

also, how can I guess how long i need to leave it on the charger?
Old 01-17-2007, 02:42 PM
  #9  
running_gag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Minot AFB, ND
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: NiCd vs. NiMH for my application

That is why they are evil. with a timed charger you will either undercharge the pack or overcharge it. undercharging limits your speed and runtime, over charging limits your overall battery life. you can pick up a decent peak charger for about 30 to 50 bucks. if you would rather not buy a new charger estimate it this way. take the mah rating of your battery (ie 3000) then devide it buy your chargers charge rate (ie 3 amps. 3000/3=1000) devide the answer by 1000 (1000/1=1) that is how may hours it will take for your charger to charge a completly dead battery. where it gets complicated is that a battery is never compleatly dead.I would discharge the battery in tha car till it is barely moving and then only charge it for 3/4 of the time you came up with.
Old 01-17-2007, 02:54 PM
  #10  
Yub, yub, cmdr!
Senior Member
 
Yub, yub, cmdr!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 2,592
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: NiCd vs. NiMH for my application

But it is a very accurate estimate for a decently discharged battery because the ACTUAL charge rate is less than the theoretical charge rate, and so it balances out.
Old 01-17-2007, 03:50 PM
  #11  
mattnin
Senior Member
 
mattnin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: grand junction, CO
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: NiCd vs. NiMH for my application

Timed chargers are horrible. If you aren't detecting a peak, how can you be sure that your packs are ever fully charged, therefore not using a packs full potential.

For instance, I use IB 3800 batteries, but routinely charge them past 4500mah before peaking using an ICE charger. So basically, I have 4500mah packs, but your timed charger would never know that.

Yub Yub, what do you mean that the actual charge rate is less than the theoretical charge rate? This makes no sense to me because at 1C, my IB 3800 should be charged at 3.8A but I charge them at 6.5A all the time.
Old 01-17-2007, 03:51 PM
  #12  
running_gag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Minot AFB, ND
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: NiCd vs. NiMH for my application

now that I didn't know. most important thing is check your batteries while they are charging. warm is good, hot is bad.
Old 01-17-2007, 08:03 PM
  #13  
cjg
Senior Member
 
cjg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vermillion, SD
Posts: 1,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: NiCd vs. NiMH for my application


ORIGINAL: phiberoptik

can you elaborate on why they are evil?

also, how can I guess how long i need to leave it on the charger?
If you have a timed charger, stick with NICD, they are far less susceptible to damage from overcharging than NIMH. Most of them clearly state they are only for NICD, that is no lie...
Old 01-19-2007, 12:27 AM
  #14  
d16z6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Renton, WA
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: NiCd vs. NiMH for my application

What I would recommend is use an average charge rate of 2.5A or so in your calculations (I think that's the specs for those chargers). Then I'd charge about 80% of the required time for a dead battery pack. Then I'd charge towards 100 but monitoring every now and then with an IR thermometer. You can get away by doing that. I think for NiMH you want to unplug it when you are seeing temperatures before 120 because you don't want to go over 120/130 F.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.