.
#3
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
.
3 servo CCPM is easier to set up, and has virtually no chance of the swashplate binding in extreme manouvers. 4 servo CCPM requires more persise set up and works well for scale flying but has a chance of binding up under extreme 3d manouvers.
For pod and boom and sport scale fuselages the 90* 3 servo set up is all we fly. For scale fuselages that cost more money and have hours of building time invested in them the 4 servo set up is highly recomended.
For pod and boom and sport scale fuselages the 90* 3 servo set up is all we fly. For scale fuselages that cost more money and have hours of building time invested in them the 4 servo set up is highly recomended.
#4
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: AU
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
3 or 4?
I agree with Moore-Vario. Think of a 3 legged VS a 4 legged stool. A 3 leg stool will always have all legs touching the ground no matter what. On a 4 leg stool, every leg better be exatly the same. No margin for error. Binding is real possibility with a 90* 4 sevo set-up. I read where James Wang started with a 4 sevo set-up in his X-treme but soon switched to a 3 srvo set-up. I use the 120* 3 servo set up in mine too. At least with Vario, you can switch between 120* and 90* set-ups and try them both.