<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt">Early this morning I saw a thread by an individual that suggested we boycott "stores" that sell UAV/UAS equipment. This guy was jumped on early and hard as a nut job. Now the thread is gone and I am wondering what exactlywashe talking about? Unrelated to this I was also looking at BVM's web site and the latest required reading and good news. I Googled S.223 to read more ofwhatthis lawwould representand came a crossed this web site. <font color="#0000ff">www.diydrones.com</font> They have just about everytopic you care to look into about UAV's/UAS's.

I believe this is a serious site,justas much as RCU. Right now the members appear to be spitting mad about the AMA "back dooring the process" with Senator Inhofe. Frankly I find it amazing what they are doing with UAV's/UAS's on this site!!!! From just the little I have read, they are serious UAV/UAS enthusiast and are determined toblock the Inhofeamendment and for a lack of better wordsarethumbing their collective noses atRC aviation.


Justmy 2centsand maybe the gentlemen has orhad avalid point, unfortunately he was run out on a rail. I hopeyou all don't do that to me!!!!

Check out thiswebsite foryourselfand make your own conclusions, IMHO we need to continue to be proactive and not relax just yet.Alsolet'snot be to quick to condemn otherswho useRCU for enjoyment and informationuseful for RC and RC Jetsor otherwise.

Mark Basel</span><span style="font-size: 10pt"><o></o></span></p>

I love spell check.......

Maybe it was removed because it was not directly related to jets, but there is another uav thread
with subject along the same line in the clubhouse forum.

That is possible, good point.....