Kangaroo crash video
#3

My Feedback: (2)
I don't care how experienced this jet-pilot is, another 10ft to the left and you it just would not be jet pieces you would be picking up.
I can only assume that he was full power all the way from his downwind leg made very wide left turn still at full power, did not realize of how fast he was going with still been in a bank turn and the end result crashed.
Maybe with his next jet he won't be as cocky trying to show off. :stupid:
I can only assume that he was full power all the way from his downwind leg made very wide left turn still at full power, did not realize of how fast he was going with still been in a bank turn and the end result crashed.
Maybe with his next jet he won't be as cocky trying to show off. :stupid:
#8
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: london, UNITED KINGDOM
Those moulded kits sound a bit like broken china when they disintegrate dont they?That is not the plane to get your rudder input wrong on. good thing it wasnt heading towards the crowd.
maybe they should have a more stringent test for jet flyers.
maybe they should have a more stringent test for jet flyers.
#9
Thread Starter

Originally posted by F900
[B]I don't care how experienced this jet-pilot is, another 10ft to the left and you it just would not be jet pieces you would be picking up.
[B]I don't care how experienced this jet-pilot is, another 10ft to the left and you it just would not be jet pieces you would be picking up.
The low-pass was safe outside the centerline of the runway, and the plane was never pointed in wards to wards himself or the crowd.
But he has been a little bored with the Roo lately....
#12
Thread Starter

I haven't spoken with him, but it looks to me like the heavy tail wind had a part in it. And of course the "need" to get under one meter to please the demanding crowd (3D heli pilots) probably had a bigger role....
Sometimes it costs to be a showman...

Sometimes it costs to be a showman...
#14
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Stokke, NORWAY
Originally posted by SAP_2000
Well.... He fly model jets for a living. He is captain for the drone squad in the Norwegian military, and burns more fuel in one year than most of us do in 10 years.... He was also awarded "best in show" for the last two years in our "Norwegian Jet Masters"
The low-pass was safe outside the centerline of the runway, and the plane was never pointed in wards to wards himself or the crowd.
But he has been a little bored with the Roo lately....
Well.... He fly model jets for a living. He is captain for the drone squad in the Norwegian military, and burns more fuel in one year than most of us do in 10 years.... He was also awarded "best in show" for the last two years in our "Norwegian Jet Masters"
The low-pass was safe outside the centerline of the runway, and the plane was never pointed in wards to wards himself or the crowd.
But he has been a little bored with the Roo lately....

Having served under him, i do not question his piloting-skills....
#16
Thread Starter

Originally posted by woketman
How could a tail wind have any effect, other than increase the model's ground speed? It certainly would not decrease it's ability to maintain a knife-edge.
How could a tail wind have any effect, other than increase the model's ground speed? It certainly would not decrease it's ability to maintain a knife-edge.
But, as I said bat judgment probably played a bigger role. OK?
#17
Originally posted by SAP_2000
Well.... He fly model jets for a living. He is captain for the drone squad in the Norwegian military, and burns more fuel in one year than most of us do in 10 years.... He was also awarded "best in show" for the last two years in our "Norwegian Jet Masters"
The low-pass was safe outside the centerline of the runway, and the plane was never pointed in wards to wards himself or the crowd.
But he has been a little bored with the Roo lately....
Well.... He fly model jets for a living. He is captain for the drone squad in the Norwegian military, and burns more fuel in one year than most of us do in 10 years.... He was also awarded "best in show" for the last two years in our "Norwegian Jet Masters"
The low-pass was safe outside the centerline of the runway, and the plane was never pointed in wards to wards himself or the crowd.
But he has been a little bored with the Roo lately....
#21
Senior Member
My Feedback: (24)
If the pilot was running at full throttle, 27 lbs of thrust is what drove that Roo in the ground. The rudders would be ineffective, at that nose low angle and altitude.
Basically the plane was over powered, CG was aft, and the wing loading is too high - result poor control of the aircraft!
Basically the plane was over powered, CG was aft, and the wing loading is too high - result poor control of the aircraft!
#24

If u look at it closely, you may see that the Roo seems to slowly, very slowly point towards the ground, which would mean no rudder input at all, simply a loss of lift as the roo rolls to the edge... => dumb thumbs.
Moreover, I think the pilot feels guilty right after the crash. He does not even shout as we do when facing RC problems, or mechanical issues...
Moreover, I think the pilot feels guilty right after the crash. He does not even shout as we do when facing RC problems, or mechanical issues...
#25

My Feedback: (9)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Tomball,
TX
I dunno about dumb thumbs on this one guys. If i had to give an educated guess i would say it was a RUDDER SERVO FAILURE. Look at the NOSE OF THE PLANE JUST AS HE ROLLED OVER. (very beginning of the video)
THE NOSE DOES PITCH UP. and then instantly goes downward.
Now we will never know from the aftermath of that crash.
I would like to know if anything survived that crash.
sean
THE NOSE DOES PITCH UP. and then instantly goes downward.
Now we will never know from the aftermath of that crash.
I would like to know if anything survived that crash.
sean




