Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Jets
 Component Layout Question >

Component Layout Question

Community
Search
Notices
RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

Component Layout Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-12-2012 | 11:32 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Queensland, AUSTRALIA
Default Component Layout Question

Guys

New to jets but fairly experienced in RC, I have purchased an FB F9F Panther and a Kingtech 170, I have also bought Jetronic valves, Powerbox SRS and all the usual goodies that compliment them, I have been advised that it is wise to seperate all the electronic components from the fuel systems i.e. plumb the systems on opposite sides of the fuselage. Also, told to mount the turbine pump lower than the UAT etc, I would apppreciate some advice regarding these suggestions as to if it matters where I mount the various components, if you have photos of your set-ups that would be helpfull also. I have also noticed in some photos that the UAT is recessed and angled down i.e. the rear of the UAT is set lower, is this required as it seems to me that it would not matter all that much?

Thanks and Regards
Peter
Old 05-12-2012 | 01:29 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Oxford, MS
Default RE: Component Layout Question

I try to keep the pump away from the receiver but that's about it. Put it where it fits. The pump does not need to be below the UAT it's a pump....that's what they do....pump.....Sorry I could not resist that one.....
Old 05-12-2012 | 02:16 PM
  #3  
FenderBean's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,213
Likes: 0
Received 99 Likes on 65 Posts
From: Huntsville AL
Default RE: Component Layout Question

The UAT is design dependent, some are made to sit straight up, on side and 45 deg angle. Who makes your UAT? As long as the receivers are 6+ inches away from ECU/Pump you should be fine
Old 05-12-2012 | 03:40 PM
  #4  
Boomerang1's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,990
Received 25 Likes on 15 Posts
From: Sydney, AUSTRALIA
Default RE: Component Layout Question

I have been advised that it is wise to seperate all the electronic components from the fuel systems i.e. plumb the systems on opposite sides of the fuselage.
I try to do that but depending on the install it may not always be possible. Centre of gravity issues often mean most of the gear has to go forward but because the fuel is
supplied by a pump the length of the fuel lines is not an issue (within reason). The header tank (UAT is just a brand name) can be useful as noseweight as, in theory, it never empties, you just have to remember to check the CG of the model with it full.

Some guys prefer the super neat install with the wiring hidden under an equipment plate, I prefer the other approach with the wiring & tubing strapped with cable ties to the sides of the fuselage which is untidy but more accesable, both methods work fine, your choice. There was a thread about this here with photos not so long ago. - John.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.