Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Jets
Reload this Page >

Redundant RX packs are they overkill?

Community
Search
Notices
RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

Redundant RX packs are they overkill?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-06-2012, 07:57 PM
  #26  
jetster81
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: london, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Redundant RX packs are they overkill?

I use a Multiplex safety-switch twinbatt unit which is light,compact and reasonably priced
Old 08-06-2012, 10:03 PM
  #27  
mr_matt
My Feedback: (10)
 
mr_matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Oak Park, CA,
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default RE: Redundant RX packs are they overkill?

Why not 2x 1100mAh A123 instead of the bigger cells?
Old 08-07-2012, 04:39 AM
  #28  
gooseF22
 
gooseF22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 2,603
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Redundant RX packs are they overkill?

FWIW, I think you are far more likely to have a wiring/switch failure than a battery failure itself.. but no way to predict when something like a connector or switch fails.. Example...

I have twin Lion's on a wolverine with twin regs in a Jet.. we go fly... land, only one light is on on the switch...hmmmmm... No power on one pack... 0 Volts..... Na.... the weld came loose on the battery, but was making intermittent contact until it bounced around on the ground... jet flew fine on one 2600 Lion.. That intermittent contact would have been a total loss w one pack..
Old 08-07-2012, 06:01 AM
  #29  
Ron101
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (22)
 
Ron101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Brentwood, CA
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default RE: Redundant RX packs are they overkill?

Why not 2x 1100mAh A123 instead of the bigger cells?

Yep I'm liking that idea... I'm running 2100 life packs now in my large planes. But use a single 1100 life in my Comp Arf Spark.

I checked and two 1100's with save me 4 oz over two 2100's.... that's pretty good.

Would you guys feel safe with two 1100 in a plane as big as the yellow twin F-18? or giant scale warbirds?

Should be fine I don't see an issue
Old 08-07-2012, 06:15 AM
  #30  
Bob_B
My Feedback: (11)
 
Bob_B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bluegrass State of Mind
Posts: 4,695
Received 82 Likes on 71 Posts
Default RE: Redundant RX packs are they overkill?

Ron you going to be flying about five minute and use about 200 maH per flight you shoud be good for at least 5 flights
Old 08-07-2012, 07:42 AM
  #31  
JackD
My Feedback: (4)
 
JackD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 759
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Redundant RX packs are they overkill?

ORIGINAL: Ron101

Why not 2x 1100mAh A123 instead of the bigger cells?

Yep I'm liking that idea... I'm running 2100 life packs now in my large planes. But use a single 1100 life in my Comp Arf Spark.

I checked and two 1100's with save me 4 oz over two 2100's.... that's pretty good.

Would you guys feel safe with two 1100 in a plane as big as the yellow twin F-18? or giant scale warbirds?

Should be fine I don't see an issue
Ron,

Redundancy increases reliability only if you can fly with only one battery. I think that 1100 is too little of a yellow F18. Let's say a battery fails after 3 flights, then you are flying with a battery that only has around 600 mah left. Very little I would say. So I completely disagree with the principle of using two small batts instead of one.

I lost my L39 like that. Had 2 batteries, both 1800 mah. theoretically enough for about 6-8 flights. On flight 7, one batt failed (I think i only turned on one... ). when I dropped the flaps for landing, the good battery didnt have enough juice and the plane crashed. What should I have done differently? assume that I had only 1800mah and fly only 4 times. Or, if I want to fly 8 times between flights, put 2x3600mah's batteries

So, the way to do redundancy is: choose the one battery you would use, and put another one of equal power. And fly the number of flights that one would give you. Don't add the 2 (at the most, multiply by 1.5, but not 2)

It is like twin engine aircraft where the plane can't fly with just one (like seneca's and the like).... what was the point of making it twin? just added complexity, doubling the chance of failure

Hope this helps
Jack



Old 08-07-2012, 07:51 AM
  #32  
k_sonn
Senior Member
My Feedback: (32)
 
k_sonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Pasadena, MD
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Redundant RX packs are they overkill?

Ron, just my opinion.  If adding a second pack makes you feel comfortable, then by all means do that.  I agree with Jack, don't decrease the mAh because of weight.  An additional 5 oz on that airframe is nothing.  If the fans won't be enough power due to 5 oz added, then put fans in it that can handle the additional weight. 

Kirk
Old 08-07-2012, 08:19 AM
  #33  
gunradd
My Feedback: (9)
 
gunradd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Springhill, FL
Posts: 3,426
Received 50 Likes on 43 Posts
Default RE: Redundant RX packs are they overkill?

I put in 2 packs and 2 switches.

With the 2 switches I turn one on test all controls then turn it off and turn battery 2 on and test all controls then go to both batteries for flight. This tests the switches and the batteries before each flight.

Not using switches is ok but its not practical if you want to test each bettery by itself before each flight with out fiddiling with the connectors.


Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Lj22078.jpg
Views:	11
Size:	101.9 KB
ID:	1790042  
Old 08-07-2012, 11:43 AM
  #34  
mr_matt
My Feedback: (10)
 
mr_matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Oak Park, CA,
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default RE: Redundant RX packs are they overkill?

You should size the battery for redundancy. A 1100 mah pack plus the backup. Decide your safety margin with the one pack, charge every flight or 2. You are charging the flight batts anyway. And for a turbine you could top off the 1100 faster than you could pump the kero back in!
Old 08-07-2012, 06:52 PM
  #35  
Ron101
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (22)
 
Ron101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Brentwood, CA
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default RE: Redundant RX packs are they overkill?

All good points guys

I think I'll drop to two 1100's and top off every two flights.... this way I have the lightest setup and I can check battery health on the charger which is the best way with life packs
you can't test the voltage on life packs, they have a flat discharge cruve until the they drop off like a rock. You must charge and see what you put back for saftey. I know there are a few tester on the market that say they can test life, but I wouldn't trust them knowing what a life discharge curve looks like.

Have seen several big planes go in now because guys thought the could test the voltage on a life pack, you can't they hold voltage until they don't
Old 08-07-2012, 08:30 PM
  #36  
JackD
My Feedback: (4)
 
JackD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 759
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Redundant RX packs are they overkill?

ORIGINAL: Ron101

All good points guys

I think I'll drop to two 1100's and top off every two flights.... this way I have the lightest setup and I can check battery health on the charger which is the best way with life packs
you can't test the voltage on life packs, they have a flat discharge cruve until the they drop off like a rock. You must charge and see what you put back for saftey. I know there are a few tester on the market that say they can test life, but I wouldn't trust them knowing what a life discharge curve looks like.

Have seen several big planes go in now because guys thought the could test the voltage on a life pack, you can't they hold voltage until they don't
Ron,

Sorry, but I don't think that is a good set up. A larg F18 can be drawing around 500mah per flight. So imagine you do one flight. you have 750 left in each bat. Next flight, you forget to turn one on (i know, it wont happen, but lets say it does... a wire breaks, anything). you are going to fly a 500mah flight with 750 in your battery. Likelihood of crashing towards the end of the flight: High

Don't skimp on capacity, not worth it. It is the only thing you cant run off. You can deadstick land, but you can't run out of voltage. It is a mistake..

Your plane though...

Been bitten by this enought times already

PS: Plus, who wants to top off every other flight? I say drop a couple 5000mahs and forget about charging the whole weekend Flying these things is hard enough, don't add more variables that mess up with your brain.

Old 08-07-2012, 08:49 PM
  #37  
Ron101
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (22)
 
Ron101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Brentwood, CA
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default RE: Redundant RX packs are they overkill?

I can run the dual 2100 in the F-18 whenever it's done...lol

this is for all my planes, so I want to try the dual 1100's in my warbirds, 3d and jet legend hawk
Old 08-07-2012, 08:59 PM
  #38  
FenderBean
 
FenderBean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Huntsville AL
Posts: 7,140
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 52 Posts
Default RE: Redundant RX packs are they overkill?

I run two 2200 ions in my F-16 plenty of flights
ORIGINAL: Ron101

I can run the dual 2100 in the F-18 whenever it's done...lol

this is for all my planes, so I want to try the dual 1100's in my warbirds, 3d and jet legend hawk
Old 08-07-2012, 09:01 PM
  #39  
JackD
My Feedback: (4)
 
JackD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 759
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Redundant RX packs are they overkill?


ORIGINAL: Ron101

I can run the dual 2100 in the F-18 whenever it's done...lol

this is for all my planes, so I want to try the dual 1100's in my warbirds, 3d and jet legend hawk
OK... that makes more sense. I thought you wanted to run the 1100's on the F18, which sounded like a stretch.

Still, I run 2x2600 on my Electra which uses less than 200mah per flight. But I guess after 3 planes down due to power system failures, you become a little paranoid

Hey, when are we flying together? too much internet talk, not enough airtime

Let me know when are you going out with Eric and I'll join you

Later
Jack
Old 08-07-2012, 09:57 PM
  #40  
Ron101
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (22)
 
Ron101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Brentwood, CA
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default RE: Redundant RX packs are they overkill?

sounds like fun Jack.... you should hit up oakdale with us...
we flew at livermore on Satuday, really nice weather

This weekend looks like it's going to be a hot mother.... but I'll let you know that next time we go out

I want to check out your electra, I might buy and electra kit to build after my F-18 not the arf.... hoping to find one that someone got burnt out trying to build

Thanks for the help and I know what your saying about better safe than sorry

later bud
Ron
Old 08-07-2012, 10:14 PM
  #41  
PaulD
My Feedback: (39)
 
PaulD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Coquitlam, B.C., CANADA
Posts: 1,473
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default RE: Redundant RX packs are they overkill?

The current output of the A123 - 1100's is impressive. Also with 2 packs you have 2200 of capacity feeding the airframe with way more punch than nickel metals. I can remember lots of guys being happy with a couple of 600 mah nicad packs even on giant scale stuff. Granted, servo torque and current draw has really increased ESP with digitals.

I have also been running a wolverine switch with a cricket. Great combination.

PaulD

Old 08-07-2012, 10:38 PM
  #42  
dubd
 
dubd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 4,313
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Redundant RX packs are they overkill?

I would trust dual 1100 A123s. I am using 2300 mah A123s in my SM F-16 and draw about 220 mah per pack per flight.
Old 08-07-2012, 10:42 PM
  #43  
dubd
 
dubd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 4,313
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Redundant RX packs are they overkill?

ORIGINAL: FenderBean

I run two 2200 ions in my F-16 plenty of flights.
Discharge rate on 2200 ions is pretty low. 5200 or bust for me.
Old 08-08-2012, 03:39 AM
  #44  
Ragz
 
Ragz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Nagpur, INDIA
Posts: 2,609
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default RE: Redundant RX packs are they overkill?

Heck, I use 2x4600 A123 liFe in my skygate hawk  Would do anything for redundancy.  When you can have it why not use it?
Old 08-08-2012, 04:09 AM
  #45  
highhorse
My Feedback: (2)
 
highhorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 2,565
Received 93 Likes on 49 Posts
Default RE: Redundant RX packs are they overkill?

ORIGINAL: dubd

ORIGINAL: FenderBean

I run two 2200 ions in my F-16 plenty of flights.
Discharge rate on 2200 ions is pretty low. 5200 or bust for me.
Discharge rate is low compared to...what? The draw spike is hardly more than a few amps, topping out at a 2 or 3c rate, right? I guess I don't get this one, but am wiling to learn if I'm missing something here.
Old 08-08-2012, 05:39 AM
  #46  
FalconWings
My Feedback: (57)
 
FalconWings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 6,995
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default RE: Redundant RX packs are they overkill?

Forgot all about my old friend Kirchhoff.

When using a backup pack, does it have to be similar to the primary or can I just use a reliable, smaller capacity NiMh pack?
Primary would be LiFe.
Old 08-08-2012, 06:02 AM
  #47  
dubd
 
dubd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 4,313
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Redundant RX packs are they overkill?

ORIGINAL: highhorse

ORIGINAL: dubd

ORIGINAL: FenderBean

I run two 2200 ions in my F-16 plenty of flights.
Discharge rate on 2200 ions is pretty low. 5200 or bust for me.
Discharge rate is low compared to...what? The draw spike is hardly more than a few amps, topping out at a 2 or 3c rate, right? I guess I don't get this one, but am wiling to learn if I'm missing something here.
Discharge rate for a 2600 mah ion is low compared to almost all other batteries, including 5200mah ion packs. The max discharge for 2600 ions is 4 amps. That isn't a problem under normal circumstances, but can be catostrophic if a servo stalls. A stalled servo can pull more than the 2600 mah ion can deliver. A 5200 mah ion can deliver 8 amps, which is why I have no issue using them. My rationale is rooted in my IMAC days where 2600 mah ions were frowned upon for anything above a 50cc plane.
Old 08-08-2012, 06:15 AM
  #48  
flyinfool1
My Feedback: (2)
 
flyinfool1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Cudahy, WI
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Default RE: Redundant RX packs are they overkill?

Don't forget CG.
Had a member at our club that thought he saved 5 oz by going with smaller batteries. But then added 5oz of lead right next to the battery to get the CG back.
When I need nose weight I just keep trying bigger batteries till it balances. If I have to carry the weight anyhow, I want it useful weight.
Old 08-08-2012, 06:16 AM
  #49  
dubd
 
dubd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 4,313
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Redundant RX packs are they overkill?


ORIGINAL: flyinfool1

Don't forget CG.
Had a member at our club that thought he saved 5 oz by going with smaller batteries. But then added 5oz of lead right next to the battery to get the CG back.
When I need nose weight I just keep trying bigger batteries till it balances. If I have to carry the weight anyhow, I want it useful weight.
Yes, that is the main reason you see 5000 mah packs in most of my planes. haha
Old 08-08-2012, 07:23 AM
  #50  
highhorse
My Feedback: (2)
 
highhorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 2,565
Received 93 Likes on 49 Posts
Default RE: Redundant RX packs are they overkill?

Discharge rate for a 2600 mah ion is low compared to almost all other batteries, including 5200mah ion packs. The max discharge for 2600 ions is 4 amps. That isn't a problem under normal circumstances, but can be catostrophic if a servo stalls. A stalled servo can pull more than the 2600 mah ion can deliver. A 5200 mah ion can deliver 8 amps, which is why I have no issue using them. My rationale is rooted in my IMAC days where 2600 mah ions were frowned upon for anything above a 50cc plane.
Here are the specs of a Duralite 2600 mah lion:

Flight weight: 3.9oz (110 grams)
Size: 2.75 x 1.5 x .75in (7 x 3.8 x 2cm)
Discharge Amperage: 5.2Amp (2C)
Charge Rate: 1Amp

I'm not saying you don't have a point worth considering. But you are short on the lion amps and assuming a double failure, ie a stalled servo when a pack fails. I'm sure the lion can surge at well over the rated 5.2 amps as well......


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.