Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Jets
Reload this Page >

Flash Power thoughts

Notices
RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

Flash Power thoughts

Old 10-12-2012, 03:21 AM
  #1  
carcraze
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chatham, ON, CANADA
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Flash Power thoughts

I am looking to get into a new jet and have been doing some reading and it seems to point to a Flash as the best option for what I want. I have been looking at either a used C Flash or U Flash new or used but I have been pondering power choices.

At this point it will be either a 100 or 140 and I was leaning to a 100 to keep it light and would like to try and get the fuel usage down for longer flight times and keep residual thrust down for landings.

Is there options for additional fuel over that of the wing tank?

I have also heard that the 100 is marginal for that bird as I don't want an under powered jet either. Operation will be off of grass fields.

Any thoughts?

Old 10-12-2012, 03:33 AM
  #2  
AFTERBURNER1
My Feedback: (80)
 
AFTERBURNER1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 4,430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Flash Power thoughts

JETCAT p140 fully bypassed is a great combo..
Old 10-12-2012, 03:34 AM
  #3  
PaulD
My Feedback: (39)
 
PaulD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Coquitlam, B.C., CANADA
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Flash Power thoughts

Check out what Peter Ayache has done with his UF. He put a BF100 in his which is more comact than a P120 but puts out similar thrust @ 27 lbs. I also think he sells the engine for about 2500 so a pretty good value. I have seen/flown Dean W's fly with a P100 JetCat and it has really good performance. The UF is a lot slipperier than the Classic.

I flew my Classic Flash with a Merlin 160 and it was ballistic but was a real handfull and was really tough to land until I put crow set-up in with the flaps. (Too much residual thrust)

Carf sells a sadlle tank kit in place of the wing tank that adds lots of capacity:

http://carf-models.com/public_carf/p...ory&proId=2772

Cheers,

PaulD
Old 10-12-2012, 03:50 AM
  #4  
RCISFUN
My Feedback: (44)
 
RCISFUN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Erie, PA
Posts: 6,632
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Default RE: Flash Power thoughts

I a have a Classic Flash and originally I had a Jet Central Rabbit rated at 19 Lbs, it flew great with that Turbine, when it came time to send in the motor for its 25 hour service interval I decided to bolt in my Jet Central Cheetah, all I can say is WOW, at 31 Lbs this thing is a rocket ship. I usually fly around at less than half throttle. The landing characteristics changed also because of the residual thrust.

I would not hesitate to put the Rabbit back in when I need the Cheetah for another project.

So what I am trying to say is pick a turbine that you feel will fit your long term flying goals, a larger thrust motor that is compact will not be a disadvantage as far as weight and fuel consumption because you probably would not be flying around at full throttle. Then is is good if you need it for a larger airframe, if you have no plans to go bigger then the New Rabbit 100 would be perfect at 22 Lbs of thrust.


Good luck, no matter what you get you will like the Flash!
Old 10-12-2012, 05:32 AM
  #5  
indubitably
My Feedback: (14)
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Flash Power thoughts

P 100 RX will push it past 200 mph
Old 10-12-2012, 05:43 AM
  #6  
luv2flyrc
My Feedback: (6)
 
luv2flyrc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Mississauga, ON, CANADA
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Flash Power thoughts


ORIGINAL: RCISFUN

I a have a Classic Flash and originally I had a Jet Central Rabbit rated at 19 Lbs, it flew great with that Turbine, when it came time to send in the motor for its 25 hour service interval I decided to bolt in my Jet Central Cheetah, all I can say is WOW, at 31 Lbs this thing is a rocket ship. I usually fly around at less than half throttle. The landing characteristics changed also because of the residual thrust.

I would not hesitate to put the Rabbit back in when I need the Cheetah for another project.

So what I am trying to say is pick a turbine that you feel will fit your long term flying goals, a larger thrust motor that is compact will not be a disadvantage as far as weight and fuel consumption because you probably would not be flying around at full throttle. Then is is good if you need it for a larger airframe, if you have no plans to go bigger then the New Rabbit 100 would be perfect at 22 Lbs of thrust.


Good luck, no matter what you get you will like the Flash!
Yep, I agree. I have a Classic that originally had my Rabbit 100 in it, flew great, nice and light, easy to land, actually had to drag it in with some power on. Put my Cheetah in it to use the Rabbit elsewhere. Gained 11oz's overall in weight with the additional 2oz's upfront to balance, about 70km/hr faster...mind you the Rabbit 100/ flash would still do 290KM/hr but, feels heavier, more of a straightline speed plane now if that's what you're looking for.

I actually prefer it with the Rabbit 100 and may put it back in over the winter. It's lighter, more agile has lots of speed. It still has unlimited vertical if you go into it with some speed. The only thing it won't do is go unlimited vertical, fully loaded from takeoff. So, for the way I like to fly it, 22lbs is perfect.

Mike

Old 10-12-2012, 05:47 AM
  #7  
carcraze
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chatham, ON, CANADA
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Flash Power thoughts

Currently I have Rookie 1 with a super eagle and I am going to keep it around. With the Eagle it can be a pain to land in our short field as well I get 7 min flights.

I was hoping to get into a flash with either motor but want to try to get 10 min, should require about 4L and want it tame on the landings hence the 100 statement.

Just looking at options so I do it once.
Old 10-12-2012, 06:28 AM
  #8  
carcraze
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chatham, ON, CANADA
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Flash Power thoughts

Don't want a brand X war but I had a look at the B100F mentioned above which is impressive with a 120N thrust and low weight.

Also saw the Merlin 140 which looked impressive with regards to weight, pricing seems decent as well.

Even more confusion.
Old 10-12-2012, 06:47 AM
  #9  
Edgar Perez
My Feedback: (13)
 
Edgar Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Gurabo, PUERTO RICO (USA)
Posts: 2,377
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Flash Power thoughts

Cheetah due to thrust and weight
Old 10-12-2012, 07:24 AM
  #10  
RCISFUN
My Feedback: (44)
 
RCISFUN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Erie, PA
Posts: 6,632
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Default RE: Flash Power thoughts


ORIGINAL: Edgar Perez

Cheetah due to thrust and weight
+1

Merlin 140 is basically the same as the Cheetah; however the Cheetah has the lifetime warranty

Both are excellent Turbines, you would be happy with either.

http://dreamworksrc.com/catalog/jetc...ah-p-1911.html

http://dreamworksrc.com/catalog/merlin-m140-p-1929.html
Old 10-12-2012, 07:58 AM
  #11  
PHIL GREENO
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: HarrowMiddlesex, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Flash Power thoughts

I have a J-Munts Merlin 140 in my Ultra Flash and it suits it just fine.With 31.5 lbs of trust it will do 250mph as wedo not have any speed limit here in the UK.

But thats not the mainreason for using the M-140.This turbine is very well constructed and is smaller in diameter and weighs less than a JC 140. I have no nose weight to get the balance correct.It is also very economical and 8-9 minutes is easy with variable throttle use and the using the main and wing tank. Gaspar is also a very helpfull guy and gives excellent service.

Phil.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Wu60492.jpg
Views:	19
Size:	413.1 KB
ID:	1810515   Click image for larger version

Name:	Rn39360.jpg
Views:	20
Size:	420.8 KB
ID:	1810516  
Old 10-12-2012, 09:46 AM
  #12  
Jetpilot24
My Feedback: (21)
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Niles, OH
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Flash Power thoughts


ORIGINAL: carcraze

I am looking to get into a new jet and have been doing some reading and it seems to point to a Flash as the best option for what I want. I have been looking at either a used C Flash or U Flash new or used but I have been pondering power choices.

At this point it will be either a 100 or 140 and I was leaning to a 100 to keep it light and would like to try and get the fuel usage down for longer flight times and keep residual thrust down for landings.

Is there options for additional fuel over that of the wing tank?

I have also heard that the 100 is marginal for that bird as I don't want an under powered jet either. Operation will be off of grass fields.

Any thoughts?

Don't forget to look at the Kingtech K-100 and K-140. I own a K-80 and a K-140 and both engines are putting out more thrust then advertised. I love these engines very reliable and if you were to actually need service, Barry and Dirk from www.kingtechusa.com are located in California.

Joe Lewis
Kingtech
K-80 and K-140
Owner
Old 10-12-2012, 09:59 AM
  #13  
carcraze
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chatham, ON, CANADA
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Flash Power thoughts

I was actually looking at the 100g and the 140 which is what promoted the original post.

I have really thinking about weight though as well and there seems to be a lot of units in the 120 140 area now with much smaller cans, I must say though the Kingtech price seems attractive.

Trying to sort it out before I make a very much thinner wallet [:@]

Any idea now the blue angels scheme shows up in the sky as I am getting old these days?
Old 10-12-2012, 10:21 AM
  #14  
PaulD
My Feedback: (39)
 
PaulD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Coquitlam, B.C., CANADA
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Flash Power thoughts

The Merlin 140 definitely wins in in the mid size power to weight ratio IMO. The Kingtech 140 is a tank^2 - it puts it strong thrust but is the same size as a 160 turbine. It will fit but it's too heavy....

It's ok to get old as long as you don't complain it's too loud!

PaulD
Old 10-12-2012, 10:58 AM
  #15  
Ramz
Senior Member
 
Ramz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Petitcodiac, NB, CANADA
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Flash Power thoughts

Sounds like a good 100 would be the proper choice. If landing, fuel consumption and lightweight are of concern, any modern 100 would be perfect. I have a K170F in mine. GPS'd at 276 mph. For me, it is perfect but most people would be perfectly happy with a 120 or 140. I definately notice the residual thrust on landing but it is still a ***** cat to land. Just takes a bit more time to slow down.
Old 10-12-2012, 11:23 AM
  #16  
Dave Wilshere
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 11,742
Likes: 0
Received 178 Likes on 144 Posts
Default RE: Flash Power thoughts

I built one last year with a P-80SE just to prove to the powerheads it would work well. Think there is a video on the UF thread somewhere. Enough for a rolling loop....
Partner Claire's UF will have a P90RXi in it and that will have a little more go than the P80SE.
I've flown UF's with P100RX, P-80SE, my 2 year old UF loads with a P-120SX. Friends with EvoJet 90, P-140RX, Hawk 100R. Great model what ever you power it with. Flights from grass with most of those too.

Dw
Old 10-12-2012, 11:28 AM
  #17  
Jamie C
 
Jamie C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Somerset, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Flash Power thoughts

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7DaBv8474A[/youtube]
Old 10-12-2012, 11:37 AM
  #18  
basimpsn
My Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Mia, FL
Posts: 2,574
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Flash Power thoughts


ORIGINAL: Ramz

Sounds like a good 100 would be the proper choice. If landing, fuel consumption and lightweight are of concern, any modern 100 would be perfect. I have a K170F in mine. GPS'd at 276 mph. For me, it is perfect but most people would be perfectly happy with a 120 or 140. I definately notice the residual thrust on landing but it is still a ***** cat to land. Just takes a bit more time to slow down.
Mine flys very well with the k170, At Hamburg jet rally everybody thought I have a P-120 because I was just cruisin around the skies, I wasn't pushing it too much. I also had the best landing
Old 10-12-2012, 05:16 PM
  #19  
Ramz
Senior Member
 
Ramz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Petitcodiac, NB, CANADA
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Flash Power thoughts


ORIGINAL: basimpsn


ORIGINAL: Ramz

Sounds like a good 100 would be the proper choice. If landing, fuel consumption and lightweight are of concern, any modern 100 would be perfect. I have a K170F in mine. GPS'd at 276 mph. For me, it is perfect but most people would be perfectly happy with a 120 or 140. I definately notice the residual thrust on landing but it is still a ***** cat to land. Just takes a bit more time to slow down.
Mine flys very well with the k170, At Hamburg jet rally everybody thought I have a P-120 because I was just cruisin around the skies, I wasn't pushing it too much. I also had the best landing
Yeah I hear ya. It is always fun to do a low, slow dirty pass, pour on the coals and accelerate vertically. A buddy of mine has a UF on order and he is going with a K140F. We probably won't be able to tell much difference straight and level. A truly great airframe.
Old 10-12-2012, 06:27 PM
  #20  
Wayne22
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Wayne22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Strathcona county, AB, CANADA
Posts: 5,391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Flash Power thoughts

watch this video....and look what power they used (at the end of the video..) You have lots of options...[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-aJsU42W6Rw[/youtube]
Old 10-12-2012, 11:41 PM
  #21  
Jame
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: East Yorkshire, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Flash Power thoughts

I think your definitely on the right track with either the 100 / 120 / 140 size turbines, I wouldnt be tempted to fit anything larger than this, we have a Merlin 140 in our UF and it feels so well balanced compared to my 160 powered Classic Flash, I had a Wren SS in mine originally and while it was nice to fly it always felt like it was cruising round with no option to go any quicker, now Ive fitted the 160, while its absolutely balistic and fun when its flat out, its hard to find a point on the Throttle position where its not at least 50 - 60mph faster than it used to be, I know some guys will say they are sure Idle would cure this but flying an aerobatic routine with the throttle set at partial settings I find a little awkward.

I had a flight with two 140 powered UF's last weekend and just thought they seemed alot nicer to fly, maybe its just me, I dont know, they just felt alot smoother and easier to fly due to the slightly lower top speed and what seemed like a more linear throttle curve.

Theres also been a few of the our club members that have dealt with Gaspar and couldnt speak highly enough of him.
Old 10-13-2012, 02:14 AM
  #22  
PaulD
My Feedback: (39)
 
PaulD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Coquitlam, B.C., CANADA
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Flash Power thoughts

The other thing to consider with the big blocks is unless you have the will and airspace to be flying around at 200 mph all the time, you will spend most of your flights in the lower end of the throttle curve - right where most turbines have crappy throttle response.

PaulD
Old 10-13-2012, 06:22 AM
  #23  
Dave Wilshere
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 11,742
Likes: 0
Received 178 Likes on 144 Posts
Default RE: Flash Power thoughts


ORIGINAL: Jamie C

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7DaBv8474A[/youtube]

Jamie

Yep! That was the one I thought about. P-80SE...plenty

Dave
Old 10-13-2012, 09:26 AM
  #24  
VF84sluggo
My Feedback: (55)
 
VF84sluggo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Flash Power thoughts

ORIGINAL: PaulD

The other thing to consider with the big blocks is...you will spend most of your flights in the lower end of the throttle curve - right where most turbines have crappy throttle response.

PaulD
Excellent point!!

This is exactly my concern over putting a pre-SE/SX P-120 in an Elan I'm getting. Sure, I'll have a great punch into the vertical, but the rest of the time I'd in this rpm range. And then on landing, with this older -120 with the slow spool-up time (but fast compared to my P-70) , I'll for sure be back in this rpm range.

Sluggo
Old 10-14-2012, 07:21 AM
  #25  
Jack28
My Feedback: (19)
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Levittown, PA
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Flash Power thoughts

I had a Classic Flash with a Jet Cental Falcon 23lbs thrust flew great. I built an Ultra this year with a Jet Central Cheetah (31 lbs thrust) it was way over powered for my flying field. Unfortunately I lost it last week due to a radio issue. Most of the fields I fly at and the jet meets I attend monitor speed with a radar gun. If i were to build another Ultra I definately would put my Rabbit 100 (22.5 lbs thrust ) in it. Plenty fast , longer flight times, lighter wieght, and less residual thrust for landing. Hope to try this combo out someday when i can fund another jet.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.