Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Jets
Question about Fly Eagle Jets A-10 >

Question about Fly Eagle Jets A-10

Community
Search
Notices
RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

Question about Fly Eagle Jets A-10

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-21-2013 | 12:26 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (120)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Traverse City, MI
Default Question about Fly Eagle Jets A-10

I have a chance to pick up a NIB 94 inch Fly Eagle Jets A-10. Everything is there, and the price is awesome, but with all the negative press they've had of late, I thought I pick your brains a little! It is the " honeycomb" construction. While this seems to be the issue structurally with their jets, I've not heard anything negative about their A-10. SO....anybody have any thoughts/ experience with this kit?
Old 10-21-2013 | 01:33 PM
  #2  
FalconWings's Avatar
My Feedback: (57)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,998
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
From: Fort Worth, TX
Default

Should not be a problem. Go for it!! Ignore the bad press. The honeycomb issues are only related to the F-14s, F-16s, Hawk, F-18's, A7's. You should be fine. You can make it work for sure.

Please have someone take a video of the maiden.

Last edited by FalconWings; 10-21-2013 at 01:35 PM. Reason: Added F-18, A-7.........
Old 10-21-2013 | 02:17 PM
  #3  
luv2flyrc's Avatar
My Feedback: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,694
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
From: Mississauga, ON, CANADA
Default

Kim, do you really think the A-10 is built better than the rest of their junk??? You're going to end up losing $9k in engines, electronics and assorted other stuff when it folds up just so, you can save a few bucks on an airframe? Makes no sense to even consider the plane, there's so much info available on this company's poor performance record.

I hope it's cheap$ because you can hardly give away an FEJ airframe right now.

Mike
Old 10-21-2013 | 02:23 PM
  #4  
1-large-bob's Avatar
My Feedback: (18)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: houston, TX
Default

If there using Honeycomb to make the structure that holds the engine pods, GOOD LUCK
And you better nail your landings dead on, Im sure the gear plates are mounted to HC too.

Robert
Old 10-21-2013 | 02:27 PM
  #5  
Nick Yuhasz's Avatar
My Feedback: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 662
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
From: Amherst, OH
Default

I have the original layup version (not honeycomb) and it has been flown at KY Jets for the last 3 years. It flies like a cub while in the air. That said, mine weighs 71 pounds wet and is LTMA-1 certified. There is a trade off for structural integrity vs weight at least partially. The balance should be in design.

Nick
Old 10-21-2013 | 02:41 PM
  #6  
FenderBean's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,213
Likes: 0
Received 99 Likes on 65 Posts
From: Huntsville AL
Default

Pm sent
Old 10-21-2013 | 03:52 PM
  #7  
rcpete347's Avatar
My Feedback: (251)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,461
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Bolton, ON, CANADA
Default

HI, I had the Fiberglass version and did the mods to make it structurally sound. It weighted 61 lbs. and flew great, wish I had kept it.
Rcpete

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.