will it convert to turbine?
02-22-2015 | 07:57 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: harwich, UNITED KINGDOM
will it convert to turbine?
http://blackhorsemodel.com.vn/?product=mig-29
what do you think they also do a turbinator look a like
what do you think they also do a turbinator look a like
02-24-2015 | 06:40 AM
#4
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: UK
Here's another video shot in rather wetter conditions.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z20l6H6fTDY
If the structure and retracts are strong enough, and if there is sufficient internal space for a couple of 40oz fuel tanks, it's about the right size airframe for a pair of Wren 44's (of which I have three). I'd expect a 44 Gold-powered ship to be heavier on take-off but lighter on landing. My main worry would be the risk of FOD ingestion with those low-slung intakes, and perhaps a mod to copy the full size plane's anti-FOD intake covers and louvres would be needed.
Also, I'm wondering why the flaps and LE droops weren't used on these flights as the take-off looked long, and the landing rather hairy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z20l6H6fTDY
If the structure and retracts are strong enough, and if there is sufficient internal space for a couple of 40oz fuel tanks, it's about the right size airframe for a pair of Wren 44's (of which I have three). I'd expect a 44 Gold-powered ship to be heavier on take-off but lighter on landing. My main worry would be the risk of FOD ingestion with those low-slung intakes, and perhaps a mod to copy the full size plane's anti-FOD intake covers and louvres would be needed.
Also, I'm wondering why the flaps and LE droops weren't used on these flights as the take-off looked long, and the landing rather hairy.
