Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Jets
Reload this Page >

Tall narrow fuel tank plumbing

Community
Search
Notices
RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

Tall narrow fuel tank plumbing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-14-2018, 08:53 PM
  #1  
bidrseed2
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ascot, UK
Posts: 535
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Tall narrow fuel tank plumbing


Hi All,
im in danger of vastly overthinking this, but I’m just putting together my jetlegend PNP F18.
The two fuel tanks are pictured below (photo stolen from another thread), But are effectively tall and narrow with a wide top section.
id normally use a felt clunk, but read about heavy clunks being better.
i couldn’t see how a heavy clunk would help in this situation, it’s likely to be left at the bottom unless your knife edge.

And I also see some threads with metal pipe on the clunk line, but can’t understand the benefit.

so the question is, what’s the “groupthink” on the best way to treat a tall narrow tank?
Is a baffle even an option?
Old 08-15-2018, 04:01 AM
  #2  
RCFlyerDan
My Feedback: (54)
 
RCFlyerDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SWFL
Posts: 2,008
Received 71 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

Well, first, the tanks aren't positioned in the F18 as they are sitting on the table as posted. They are positioned as an upside down "L". In the pictures, the outside of the "L" is positioned down into the fuse leaving the large flat area for the vent. In other words, the two red metal connections are vertical in the fuse when mounted. It drains fast into the primary center tank leaving a deep part of the "L" to drain the rest of the fuel. And, you have said this on your post. 95% of the time flying the JL F18 you will be in a positive G force, so the fuel is always at the lowest point. Those clunks are some of the best to use. CARF uses them all of the time in their jets.

As far as the metal pipe on the clunk line, it is to keep the clunk line from going forward and getting stuck a 180 degrees. The metal pipe also is used when there is a baffle inside the tank. The metal pipe is put through the hole in the baffle and keeps the fuel line from getting cut by the baffle. There is no way that you can put a baffle in a sealed tank that doesn't have one. Those tanks are a lot better design, then the ones I had in my JL F18 a few years back.

But, yes, you are over thinking the installation.
Old 08-15-2018, 04:16 AM
  #3  
gunradd
My Feedback: (9)
 
gunradd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Springhill, FL
Posts: 3,426
Received 50 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

For me on tanks like these I use a small header tank. Then when the clunks are not in the fuel you are still drawing from a header tank. I am not a fan of the felt clunks if you are using a UAT also. They add allot of restriction and can cause air bubbles due to cavitation. Felt clunks by them selves are ok but don't use them with an added filter in the UAT.

Also on tanks like these I set them up in series. That way the second tank stays full half the flight so you end up drawing less air. The metal tubing is used incase your clunks can get stuck. You add the tube in the middle to keep the clunk from moving to the front of the tank and possibly getting stuck. This does not always need to be done and probably not needed for your install since you are using that black clunk line.
Old 08-15-2018, 04:29 AM
  #4  
RCFlyerDan
My Feedback: (54)
 
RCFlyerDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SWFL
Posts: 2,008
Received 71 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

Hey Chris! Hope all is well with you!

These are saddle tanks that go into a main larger tank, then the UAT.
Old 08-15-2018, 04:54 AM
  #5  
FenderBean
 
FenderBean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Huntsville AL
Posts: 7,140
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

I would only use that style as a saddle tank, hopefully you have a main. Then just do like states above saddle to mains and main to UAT.

Last edited by FenderBean; 08-15-2018 at 04:56 AM.
Old 08-15-2018, 05:44 AM
  #6  
Reever45
My Feedback: (16)
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Grand Junction, CO
Posts: 109
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RCFlyerDan
Hey Chris! Hope all is well with you!

These are saddle tanks that go into a main larger tank, then the UAT.
These are the main tanks that are tee'ed together to the UAT, there is no main larger tank. At least my BVM PNP 18 is that way out of the box. The F16 was the same two main saddle tanks tee'ed to the UAT
Old 08-15-2018, 11:03 AM
  #7  
bidrseed2
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ascot, UK
Posts: 535
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

As Reeves said....there’s no additional tank, the two pictured above simply join to a UAT.... I plan to do so in series.

there is an additional tank in the kit, but that’s for smoke.
Old 08-15-2018, 01:13 PM
  #8  
RCFlyerDan
My Feedback: (54)
 
RCFlyerDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SWFL
Posts: 2,008
Received 71 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

They’ve changed the fuel system. As Chris said, I wouldn’t do that set up without a header before the UAT. Or in series. The issue that I see with series, is that your lateral balance will go off center. This will affect your loops and other maneuvers. The gyro will hide it. My F18 was JL and had the two saddle tanks then into about a half of a gallon main tank then to the UAT. The fuselage had to be taken apart in two halves to get to the main tank.

Last edited by RCFlyerDan; 08-15-2018 at 01:22 PM.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.