Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Jets
Reload this Page >

CARF REBEL 2m

Community
Search
Notices
RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

CARF REBEL 2m

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-2024, 09:24 PM
  #826  
RC Rich
 
RC Rich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Sun City West, AZ
Posts: 36
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I'm happy with the way the build is going and it should be ready to fly in about a week. It has been a good learning experience compared to the PNP's I've been flying lately.
My Electron gear is all installed, but I didn't grind any flat spots on the shafts because with so many set screws they seemed secure. If I fly off of a paved runway, should I disassemble them and grind the flat spots on all three gear and the steering arm?



Last edited by RC Rich; 01-15-2024 at 09:26 PM.
Old 01-15-2024, 10:10 PM
  #827  
Dave Wilshere
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,100
Received 735 Likes on 531 Posts
Default

Yes. 100% flats are needed, even if it is just one set screw per side of pin.

I have this argument regularly whether it’s needed, Electron pins are so hard the screw cannot grab without a flat.
The following 2 users liked this post by Dave Wilshere:
Canadian Man (01-16-2024), Skunkwrks (02-16-2024)
Old 01-16-2024, 12:14 PM
  #828  
voodoodb
My Feedback: (98)
 
voodoodb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Flora, MS
Posts: 620
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Thoughts on factory flight control settings?? 15mm on elevator seems small.
Old 01-16-2024, 12:15 PM
  #829  
acw
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 670
Received 23 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

15mm at the root is too small. 15mm at the tip is too much. I ended up with using something in between.
Old 01-16-2024, 09:41 PM
  #830  
RC Rich
 
RC Rich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Sun City West, AZ
Posts: 36
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Wilshere
Yes. 100% flats are needed, even if it is just one set screw per side of pin.

I have this argument regularly whether it’s needed, Electron pins are so hard the screw cannot grab without a flat.
Thanks Dave, I will do so.
Old 01-16-2024, 09:48 PM
  #831  
RC Rich
 
RC Rich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Sun City West, AZ
Posts: 36
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by acw
15mm at the root is too small. 15mm at the tip is too much. I ended up with using something in between.
That's good to know. On the same note, the manual recommends 20mm up and down for the ailerons that I'm measuring from the root, but it looks a little aggressive for a starting point. Any opinion on that?
Old 01-16-2024, 10:34 PM
  #832  
Dave Wilshere
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,100
Received 735 Likes on 531 Posts
Default

Yes, you can reduce the aileron travel, you should know how you like an aeroplane to feel, some pilots like powerful controls, some very soft, then there is Expo and how to use it.
On the Rebel a visual look at the control surfaces would be more movement on the tail surfaces than the Ailerons. Lots of flap movement.
The following users liked this post:
RC Rich (01-17-2024)
Old 01-20-2024, 02:51 PM
  #833  
voodoodb
My Feedback: (98)
 
voodoodb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Flora, MS
Posts: 620
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Question regarding tank. Am I assuming correct that the wood mounts glue to rear and front of tank, ply strip glues to inner fuse? Allows removal of tank?
The following users liked this post:
Ken Bryant (02-23-2024)
Old 01-20-2024, 09:22 PM
  #834  
RC Rich
 
RC Rich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Sun City West, AZ
Posts: 36
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Yes, correct. Hopefully some these photos from my current build help.




The following 2 users liked this post by RC Rich:
Ken Bryant (02-23-2024), Skunkwrks (01-26-2024)
Old 01-26-2024, 09:47 PM
  #835  
Skunkwrks
Senior Member
 
Skunkwrks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 417
Received 66 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by voodoodb
Question regarding tank. Am I assuming correct that the wood mounts glue to rear and front of tank, ply strip glues to inner fuse? Allows removal of tank?
Make sure there is a little tilt back to ensure fuel stays at the back of the tank.

Ric has provided good photos to go by
Old 02-12-2024, 02:34 PM
  #836  
vegasking
My Feedback: (4)
 
vegasking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: New River, AZ
Posts: 13
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Finished my Rebel 2m.




The following 4 users liked this post by vegasking:
DenisFerrari (02-17-2024), paulhat (02-14-2024), Rapunzeline (03-02-2024), RC Rich (02-13-2024)
Old 02-12-2024, 05:47 PM
  #837  
dirtypool
My Feedback: (6)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Clovis, CA
Posts: 247
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nice build. I have the same turbine. Love it.
Old 02-20-2024, 11:53 AM
  #838  
voodoodb
My Feedback: (98)
 
voodoodb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Flora, MS
Posts: 620
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Can any of you with a Demon Cortex Gyro provide me with your settings? Mine seems to fly better with the gyro off.
Old 02-20-2024, 12:46 PM
  #839  
RC Rich
 
RC Rich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Sun City West, AZ
Posts: 36
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by voodoodb
Can any of you with a Demon Cortex Gyro provide me with your settings? Mine seems to fly better with the gyro off.
On my Futaba 18SZ, the servo monitor shows gyro numbers of 65-normal flight, 85-half flaps and 105-full flaps. The gains increase in the flap conditions to provide more stability while flying slower. Those are all negative numbers for all three conditions on the regular Demon Cortex, not the Pro. My Rebel Classic flys very smooth and I have never seen a hint of oscillation. When I connected the Cortex to a PC, I didn't change any of the stock gain settings and only changed the orientation, SBus and channel assignments.
Old 02-20-2024, 02:50 PM
  #840  
acw
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 670
Received 23 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by voodoodb
Can any of you with a Demon Cortex Gyro provide me with your settings? Mine seems to fly better with the gyro off.
Take a not of which bank you are using, green or yellow. Then make sure the gyro is setup in "normal" (non heading) mode for all channels in that mode. Otherwise, I think I'm still using default values on mine

The Rebel doesn't really need a gyro but my cortex definitely helps during x-wind operations and turbulent weather.
Old 02-22-2024, 11:48 AM
  #841  
bluelevel
My Feedback: (39)
 
bluelevel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cape Coral, FL
Posts: 457
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Mine will be electric, putting in a 130mm Jetfan on 14s 10000mAh Lipos. Build is progressing well, nearly done with only the thrust tube and battery tray mounts missing. Will also have to add cheater holes so that the fan can breathe freely.

I have attached a few pictures of my progress so far. Also decided to add some white to the underside of wings and stabs to make it more visible.



No thrust tube yet


No thrust tube yet












Decided to add some white to the bottom














Added some white stripes






UBec with small 800mAh buffer battery


No battery tray yet


Battery tray with quick release


Quick release for batteries

Last edited by bluelevel; 02-22-2024 at 11:54 AM.
The following 2 users liked this post by bluelevel:
acw (02-26-2024), RC Rich (02-22-2024)
Old 03-02-2024, 08:32 AM
  #842  
bluelevel
My Feedback: (39)
 
bluelevel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cape Coral, FL
Posts: 457
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Plane is done! Tried different materials for the thrust tube. The 0.35mm Mylar film I used at first turned out to be a bit too thick and stubborn. Found the same material in 0.25mm strength and this worked much better. Very happy with the outcome!

Batteries are a bit far back in the fuselage to achieve a proper CG, feeding them through the fuse is a bit of a hassle. All in all not too bad though, the quick release battery trays should help a bit.

Cheater holes have also been added to the top hatch. Wanted to put some mesh behind the openings at first but then decided against it. The open intakes are closer to the ground than the cheater holes, also these "gills" provide a cool view onto the equipment tray inside the fuselage.

Weight wise I ended up at 13kg (with fully charged batteries Name:  smile.gif
Views: 520
Size:  1.0 KB ), so about the same number as the turbine powered versions full of fuel.











The following users liked this post:
RC Rich (03-06-2024)
Old 03-06-2024, 07:44 PM
  #843  
RC Rich
 
RC Rich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Sun City West, AZ
Posts: 36
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Nice job on everything along with excellent workmanship! I can't believe how perfect of a job you did cutting in the "gills".
Looking forward to a flight report and a video would be nice also. I'm having fun with the Rebel Classic, but when I go home for the summer, no turbine fields. This would be an interesting option.
Old 03-14-2024, 07:01 AM
  #844  
bluelevel
My Feedback: (39)
 
bluelevel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cape Coral, FL
Posts: 457
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Unhappy

Tried the maiden of my EDF powered Classic Rebel today but it was a non-starter (literally). I fly off grass that was still fairly wet today. Regardless what I tried, I couldn't get the plane to rotate. I started with the CG at the back of the wing tube and moved it back from there by mounting the batteries about 2cm further back. Elevator travel looks good to me and of course I was using my usual setting of 15 degrees of take-off flap.

I used the "Dave" method to check the CG holding it by the fuselage lip right above the spar behind the wing tube with the canopy off. With the canopy on the CG will shift forward a bit but it looks like that CG has worked fine for others. Anyway I find this strange as that method was suggested for turbine powered Rebels with just landing fuel on board. With a full tank the CG will shift forward by a good margin because all of the fuel is in front of the CG. My EDF powered plane does not shift the CG at all and is at the back of the wing tube all the time.

Power-wise it did not seem under powered, she accelerated just fine. My logs showed 190Amps @ 54 Volts max, so almost 10kW equaling about 13kg of thrust as per the manufacturers stats.

Just watching the plane accelerate it looked as if the nose was pushed down. Of course it draws air from the nose gear opening but I do not think that this will be enough to affect the plane negatively. Didn't want to move the CG further back for a maiden and suspect that the angle of attack may not be right (the nose strut being too short). Can you guys please do me a favor and measure the length of your nose strut? I was once given a too long nose gear when I ordered a set for an Ultra Flash, probably this time it's the other way round and it might be a bit too short.

Last edited by bluelevel; 03-14-2024 at 12:14 PM.
Old 03-14-2024, 08:33 AM
  #845  
acw
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 670
Received 23 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

On my plane, the distance between the bottom of the fuselage in front of the front landing gear and the plane at the bottom of the wheel is 155mm

If that's not the problem, I would actually measure the static thrust that you are getting at full power. This can be done with a travel luggage scale attached to the front landing gear leg. Also could it it be that your EDF thrust tube is pointing downwards too much?


Old 03-14-2024, 09:03 AM
  #846  
bluelevel
My Feedback: (39)
 
bluelevel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cape Coral, FL
Posts: 457
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by acw
On my plane, the distance between the bottom of the fuselage in front of the front landing gear and the plane at the bottom of the wheel is 155mm

If that's not the problem, I would actually measure the static thrust that you are getting at full power. This can be done with a travel luggage scale attached to the front landing gear leg. Also could it it be that your EDF thrust tube is pointing downwards too much?
I have just measured the length of my front strut. It is 152mm measured from the top of the strut (where it meets the steering arm) to the wheel axle. Measured the same way as you did (bottom of fuselage to bottom of wheel) I also have 155mm.

The fuselage is way too narrow to allow any tube angle. My EDF tube is larger in diameter than the original metal thrust tube and my fan sits exactly at the same height as a turbine would (right on the mounting rails).

Thrust wasn't measured but feels absolutely fine compared to my turbine powered planes. Max ground speed also seemed fine. My Rebel Max will take off at that speed without any flap...

As I said in my original post, the turf was fairly wet today, that will for sure make a big difference. But anyway I'd like to be able to fly that plane from any surface. Only other ideas I have is moving the CG further back and probably adding a spacer of 1cm between the steering arm and the strut to see if that helps.

Last edited by bluelevel; 03-14-2024 at 11:58 AM.
Old 03-14-2024, 11:53 AM
  #847  
Dansy
My Feedback: (53)
 
Dansy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Prescott, Ont.
Posts: 2,985
Received 159 Likes on 142 Posts
Default

The nose gear on the rebel is suppose to be mounted from the underside….? It was that way on the Pro…
Old 03-14-2024, 11:56 AM
  #848  
bluelevel
My Feedback: (39)
 
bluelevel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cape Coral, FL
Posts: 457
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dansy
The nose gear on the rebel is suppose to be mounted from the underside….? It was that way on the Pro…
I assume so, at least that's the way I did it

The following users liked this post:
Dansy (03-14-2024)
Old 03-14-2024, 12:02 PM
  #849  
Dave Wilshere
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,100
Received 735 Likes on 531 Posts
Default

The large tail is not balance critical, but if you balance it my method/ position with batteries, I think you will have a nice starting point.
The reason you can’t rotate is part EDF suck, but really just Electron nose oleo spring being too soft. I got fed up with modifying them for customers (Diablo too) so we are working with Electron for stronger springs.
TBH the Electron nose leg is a bit short for the Rebel, a 5mm spacer would make a huge difference, but what you need to do is fill the spring + 15-20mm extra of 3/32 Tygon. Sit the spring in the plunger, push a length of Tygon through till it hits the bottom of the plunger, with the spring uncompressed cut the Tygon flush with the top. Reassemble and go fly.
The following users liked this post:
DenisFerrari (03-24-2024)
Old 03-14-2024, 12:05 PM
  #850  
Dave Wilshere
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,100
Received 735 Likes on 531 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bluelevel
I assume so, at least that's the way I did it

That is correct, it could actually do with some packers as my Rebel Hot, I packed the nose unit down 6mm on that.


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.